Can hard work beat natural talent?
>>69849555
No, but his girlfriend can sure beat him though.
>>69849555
Sure, if the more talented person isn't trying as hard. Sometimes.
Sometimes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFV3XzooB3I
no
>>69849634
delete this ;_;
>>69849555
Always. Talent is really just a head start, if you do nothing with it then it's wasted.
>>69849753
but if you do theres no way a hard worker with no talent can beat you
>>69849555
Arnold Schwarzenegger
You would think his best pal Phil of the future would warn him of apocalypse.
>>69849646
9/10 the person with more experience and training will win. You have to be exceptionally talented to give pros a run for their money.
someone please post theleg breakingwebm
Yes
>>69849555
Beyond pure physical attributes there is no such thing as natural talent,
only how much your brain has adapted to millions of different microskills, trained by hard work and repitition, that form together into a skillset that society deems valuable
there's no such thing as natural talent.
if you think people are better than you because of some divine natural talent you're just pathetic.
>>69851964
>Beyond natural talent there is no such thing as natural talent
Whoah
>>69852125
the only time you ever need to worry about not having "natural talent" is if you are competing at a world class level, where the difference of 1% better genes will actually matter.
>>69852098
But there clearly is, what's the point in denying that?
>>69851964
Well said
>>69852306
people are amazing at whatever they choose to do because of hard work and dedication.
stop making excuses for your lack of skills when you don't work as hard as others.
>>69852373
But some people clearly are dumber than others, and find it harder to attain the same level
>>69852466
I have met few people that were legitimately dumb. Most were just lazy and had a lifetime of bad habits (probably picked up from their parents) that impeded their progress.