>>69800321
Editing really is what killed the movie. If it had more establishing shots, it would've been more well received. It just felt lazy and rushed because of how poorly edited it was.

Also Jesse Eisenberg was fucking horrible, he ruined every scene he was in. Besides that the movie wasn't horrible.

>>69800321
for plebes

>>69800455
Okay, Zack, sure, the editor did it.

Civil War. Hohohoh is the only fun part to a dull movie

>>69800321
And thank fuck for that

>>69800321

Schindlers Lists

>no quips 0/10 it's shit - ign

>>69800321
All avengers movie. Deadpool.
btw,is civil war a CA movie or an avenger movie ?
If it is the former,https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/69781299/#69781299

BvS gave me goosebumps.

>>69801233
there were a few humorous bits if I recall correctly, probably moreso than OP's movie

>>69800455
it had a bunch of establishing type shots. almost every scene had one

>>69800455
>Even though everything in the movie was horrible, the movie itself wasn't horrible.

wut?

>>69804867

he said the editing and a single actor were horrible. that's not really everything

>>69804867

Literally everyone who defends this movie.

"It's bad ... but it's not THAT bad." LIke somehow that's an achievement.

As if any quality, great movie ever needed to be justified as not being THAT bad.

someone start posting tarkovsky

>>69800321
I believe it was a great movie but I also agree it wasnt fun. It was literally the opposite of fun and thats why it bombed with the critics.

Then again, I believe its a great film. Many films are not fun to watch like for example Melancholia or Come and See.

On the other side, I found CW extremely fun but a mediocre movie.