>tfw you realize that DC has no major box office success movie outside Batman and ancient Superman movies
>tfw old Superman movies are only successful because of the era they were made and because they were among the first of it's kind
>tfw DC can't make anything outside Batman
What can't DC into live action?
Not enough quips
>>69646710
So?
>Siding with one faceless corporation over another faceless corporation
BvS is kino by the way.
>>69646772
I'm not siding with anyone, I'm just baffled that they are doing so much worse than their competition
Constantine was great (Aside from no Sting), and V for Vendetta was pretty good too. Now that you have posted this list, I am reminded that I have never had a movie from Mar-vel that just makes you think, you know?No Oscars, only VFX andHair
>>69646710
Hold on bro those 1st 2 superman movies were fuckin awesome
>>69647161
You misunderstood me, I'm solely talking about box office here i.e. why can't DC make a movie for the masses, I also loved those two movies and I'm really hyped for MOM'S GONNA FREAK movie
>>69647211
I also have fond memories of those movies, but do you really think they would be so successful if they were made in the capeshit age.
>>69646710
old superman movies were successful because they were faithful interpretations of the character where he wasn't a narcissistic douchebag
>Man of Steel ~$700 Mil
>BvS ~$900 Mil
>No success
wew
>>69647444
thats like asking if the old Howard the Duck movie would be a success now in the days of reddit and e-memes.
every movie is a product of its time
>>69648042
This
