I enjoy DC and Marvel heroes and villains. But if you're going to put them against each other, Civil War was a better acted, better written, better directed flick with a coherent storyline. I wish BvS was the best capeshit movie to date, but it was horribly bad.
All Marvel but cinematography in CW suck nonetheless.
>>69644827
> I don't know what I'm talking about
>>69644692
so, what's /tv/ consensus on what of those capeshits is the lesser evil?
>>69644692
fuck off with your capeshit
>>69644692
>Civil War was a better acted, better written, better directed flick
it's so strange that people actually believe this, niggas know nothing.
>>69644952
DC and WB isn't even a threat yet and will likely never will anytime soon, so the one that Disney owns
>>69644827
Marvel cinematography is terrible. Every single shot is designed to save as much money shooting as possible, that's why every single fight scene is an overcast day.
Sydertography is also shit because it's empty but it at least looks interesting
>>69645039
>DC is less popular so Disney's marvel is the lesser evil
what?
>>69645130
Oh fuck I thought you said greater evil, my bad
>>69644966
cringe
>>69644692
I literally fell asleep during CW in the theaters, the manager had to ask me to leave because my snoring was so loud
Bitch, please
>>69645244
cringe
Does anyone know how much Paul Rudd got paid for CW? Also, spodermon actor?
>>69645368
Paul Rudd got I think 20 million
Tom Holland got 1000 and a night of fucking with Mariss tomei
>>69645422
worth more than the 20 million tbqhwytfamalamazoids
>>69644692
>kubrickfags BTFO
>>69644692
>image.jpg
What a fucking surprise.
Seriously, ban phone posters already.
>>69644692
Marvel - one coherent storyline
DC - hey I've got a brilliant idea, let's take elements from all these different story lines:
-The inception of the justice league
-The dark knight returns
-The flash paradox
-A death in the family
-Superman vs doomsday
-The death of superman
-Crisis on infinite earths
-Darkseid war
and we'll just sort of forcebly mash them all together into one giant clusterfuck of a story, fans will love that.
>>69645091
You literally do NOT know what you're spouting out of your mouth.
>>69645559
lol what a fag
>>69645263
What are you trying to put across here Jim?
>>69645498
>what is inflation
>>69644827
>this is the only thing I can say since the "BVS is gonna get 1billion" meme failed
Who's laughing now Evans?
>>69645422
Shiet, Tom got a good deal.
>>69645559
I vote we ban DCucks
>>69645823
Affleck is almost a decade older
>>69644692
>Civil War was a better acted, better written, better directed flick
>>69645823
I liked Osama Bin Affleck as Bamham. Too bad it was just a mediocre movie.
If they actually got a competent director and writer then it would have been so much better.
Just make a live action TDKR.
>>69645909
Ban all capeposters
>>69645945
It did. Anyone who disagrees has no idea what they're saying and has no knowledge of film.
>>69645945
>flick
The answer was right there
>>69646103
this, CW is a better flick, but BvS is the better kino.
>>69645992
>Anyone who disagrees has no idea what they're saying and has no knowledge of film.
Yes, because instead they have a good knowledge of art and cinema
>>69646281
Both of those are capeshit
Capekino is a meme phrase, the only good modern Capeshit was made by singer and raimi
>>69644692
Nobody with a sane might would even think that BvS can compete with Civil War.
In fact Civil War perfectly illustrates why BvS was such a huge failure despite being essentially the same movie
http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2016/05/09/captain-america-civil-war-shows-exactly-why-batman-v-superman-failed/#2672d2e846bb
>>69644877
He's right, there's zero artistry in the MCU.
>>69646289
Nope!
>>69646360
incorrect
>>69646581
Nope, it's all capeshit
>>69644692
>I enjoy DC and Marvel heroes and villains
You are a pleb.
>>69646621
>le all capeshit is bad but i have exceptions
>>69646489
>B-but art xD
I bet you're one of those people who dismiss truly beautiful paintungs because they are drawn by people you don't know and think everything drawn by some modern hipster dadaist is a masterpiece
>>69645091
>interesting
that's the buzzword of the day
keep it going
I think BvS was more 'interesting' in symbology, unless you don't like christian grey of symbology, and prefer the badass Beowulf-esque of Norse Mythos.
I like Norse mythos better.
>>69644692
Why do the dc fanboys even defend BvS trash? It was horrible and you know it. Stop defending the movies blindly and lay down some harsh criticisms so you might actually get good DC movies in 2025.
>>69646661
>things I never said
All capeshit is capeshit, there is no capekino
It can be good capeshit, but it's still capeshit
Nice meme
>>69645422
are you memeing about paul rudd?
>>69644692
ITT people brag about money they don't have
>>69645823
Money can't buy happiness. I can guarantee that Evans is much more happy than Affleck.
>>69645823
How much of Affleck's money goes to his wife?
>>69644692
>940 million
It's fucking over . Civil war needed to make 16 trillion dollars domestically just to break even. No wonder Disney's stocks are in the toilet
>>69645559
Literally cringe : the post
>>69647075
he probably is. studies prove that dumber people tend to be happier.
>>69645559
image.jpgposters and gifposters are the REAL cancer of /tv/
>>69644692
Updated the image.
>>69644827
The only difference is Marvel stuff has daylight sometimes.
>>69644692
Civil War is a very well constructed film but i think it's actually pretty mediocre and nowhere near as good as The Avengers films or Winter Soldier. It was actually kind of insulting how out of character Steve, Tony, and Natasha were throughout the film, their characterizations were absolutely terrible and the Sokovia Accords were a poorly written plot device that really doesn't make any sense.
Not to mention freezing Bucky up again at the end almost completely defeats the entire purpose of the film. There were so many more interesting and logical routes they could have taken throughout the film but they constantly neglected them in favor of artificially constructed, lowest common denominator conflicts. As someone who has been a big fan of the Marvel films, Civil War felt like Feige spitting in my face. It has killed any interest I have in the upcoming films
>>69645694
Snyder is a ninja. He ruined so many good stories for DC.
>>69646289
Cheadle's 2 minute soliloquy at the end is worth more than 3 hours of Snyder's pseudo-Intellectualism.
>>69648188
I disagree. jpg
I agree with everything but the very last part.
BvS was subpar for sure, but it's not that bad.
>>69645795
2001 space odyssey made way less than 400 million adjusted-for-inflation-dollars. is common knowledge that the better the movie, the less appeal with plebs.
>>69648186
and avatar would be off the charts.
>>69647943
KEK
>>69648711
>2001 space odyssey made way less than 400 million adjusted-for-inflation-dollars. is common knowledge that the better the movie, the less appeal with plebs
are you implying 2001 is a good movie? no, no memery. like, honestly? movie was fucking shit man. boring, uninteresting. effects were good, the rest was trash. guy goes to space and becomes a fetus. what a fucking masterpiece of shitdom. its a BAD movie but it looked good. thats the problem with you idiots. you think 2001 and rosebud are fantastic, best of the best movies. but theyre not. 2001 was good for effects. anal rosebud was good for how it was structured/ theyre both shit, but they had a lasting effect on future films, which is why people compare newer movies to them. plebs like you think this means theyre the cream of the crop and end up making yourselves look stupid
>>69644692
>was a better acted, better written, better directed flick with a coherent storyline.
>being this objectively wrong
>>69645498
>2001
>Domestic Total Adj. Gross: $371,464,000
>BvS
>Domestic Total as of May. 15, 2016: $328,200,056
FUCKING TOPPEST KEKES
>>69649236
the marvelfriend mentality, ladies and gentlemen
>>69649315
So, it's BvS even better than 2001? or are americucks even more pleb than rest of the world?
>>69649236
>boring, uninteresting. effects were good, the rest was trash.
Translation for ADHD plebs: I didn't get it, but at least it looked nice.
>>69648186
was Transformers DOTM any good?
i mean, as a hollywood entertainment mass marketed product.
Current Marvel method: Substance over style
Current DC method: Style over substance
Neither elevates the material to its fullest potential, but at least on the Marvel side they've had the sense to build their brand over time and make it inclusive to general audiences. DCs stubbornness to emulate that formula is why they're in 2nd place, or rather 3rd after Fox.
>>69645091
>that's why every single fight scene is an overcast day
You see, the reason why they do this is so the audience can actually see what's going on in the fight scenes. Marvel's cinematography has always been purposedly simple for that reason. They're not trying to make art, but entertainment, and that's why they succeed more than DC.
>>69646689
>Dadaist
Fuck, that brings me back to art class.
>>69648186
>believing there's a correlation
The Dark knight and its sequel both reached the billion fyi. Yet if there are any recent DC masterpieces, that's those 2.
>>69644827
1 billion dollars cw passed says different dcuck.
>>69645694
>it's somehow WB's fault that audiences are too dumb
>>69651907
Its the audience's fault snyder didn't mske a good film
>>69648188
>get a load of this guy
They were in character, you didn't agree with it.
>>69647477
Probably a 10%-25%
>>69644692
hey, why does a regular movie-going individual care so much about the monetary gains of a movie? I don't fucking understand. Are you literally basing your opinion of the movie on how much money it makes? Are you genuinely this motherfuckingly autistic? Do you even know how to formulate an original thought or are you doomed to unknowingly parrot each and every thing you've ever witnessed without even the slightest understanding of what any of it means, you fucking cockloving nigger piece of shit. Go drown in a fire.
Slightly off topic
But I'm going to watch Civil War tomorrow
Should I watch in IMAX 3D or just regular
>>69652901
Well the more money a movie makes, the more money the sequels get.
>>69652901
Well the more money a movie makes, the more pleb it usually is
>>69652857
I didn't feel they were in character at all.
In every movie leading up to this one Tony Stark had a strong record of not trusting big government bureaucracies and has been established as not wanting the government to have control over him or his tech. Now at the flip of a switch is ready to give all control over himself and The Avengers to a UN Panel. It's such a drastic change of heart that comes out of nowhere with no real weight or motive behind it. People accept it because everyone already expected him to be for it because of the comic, but the actual character in the movies is not one who would have made that decision.
The Winter Soldier basically ended with Black Widow saying "screw you" and walking out on a congressional panel trying to hold her responsible for her past. Again out of nowhere here comes the sudden reversal. There was no real reason for her to sign the Accords at all. She had absolutely no motivation for it other than to create extra conflict. If the writers had half a decent idea they'd have mentioned that the only thing keeping her from prison for the things she'd done, and keeping old enemies from coming at her, was her status as an Avenger and that if she didn't sign it would be basically open season on her. Then you'd have a real reason for her to sign it. I also couldn't believe for a second that she'd actually walk into battle against Clint and Steve. It's just not who she is at this point.
>>69653653
As for Steve, the thing that really annoyed me was how dedicated he seemed to be at getting into a fight with Tony. When Cap and Sam have Bucky's arm trapped in the vice Sam even suggests calling Tony and trying to explain to him but Steve immediately dismisses the idea and takes the path of greatest confrontation. He hardly takes one levelheaded action throughout the entire film.
I also don't understand why Steve was against the accords to such an extent. If anything the way the Accords appear in the film you'd actually expect Steve to be for them and Tony and Natasha against, since they're presented in so narrow in scope that the only impact it has on him is basically making him a soldier again. He doesn't have the Anti-Government, Rogue Agent history that Tony and Natasha have to justify being against them. At the very least Agents of SHIELD actually addresses the Accords in a broader context than the film managed to, but without it Steve's argument and stance doesn't hold as much weight as it should.
>>69645922
At least use the final rating for Civil war
LOOK AT HIS LIPS!
