How long do you think it will take for the feminists to stop trying to force all female flicks down our throats?
There is no way that Hollywood is going to continue to support box office bombs.
>movie has been rumoured for months
>/tv/ only starts bitching about it when JLaw's name gets thrown around with it
Who cares? Wasn't Ocean's 11 all men in the first place?
>>69627308
>Hollywood's latest attempt at addressing its sexism problem
There is no sexist problem.
Strong female leads have always existed in tv shows and movies.
Fucking hell Ripley in Alien was a strong lead in the 80s, so was Sarah Connor in Terminator, Rose Tyler in Doctor Who...
Do any of these fucking ignorant feminists ever watch movies?
>>69627308
>There is no way that Hollywood is going to continue to support box office bombs.
In two years we're going to have another big budget "Ancient Egypt wuz white" fantasy action flick shit the bed. And they'll continue to pump these out like clockwork until it becomes popular; like capeshit is now.
>>69627440
>Rose Tyler
>Strong
Nah
>>69627308
until betas like you will stop paying them. protip, now women pay for the kino.
>>69627640
this shit can't be real at this point, even I'm not this pathetic and I'm a 30 year old virgin
>>69627567
>An African Jesus movie
That would actually be cool and fun to see.
I bet Pontius Pilate will be played by a white German.
>Idris Elba as Jesus
FUCKING YESS
>>69627639
I guess you didnt watch season 4?
>>69627308
Feminists don't understand reason.
They would have their shitty movies subsidized by the government, if they could.
I just want to know when we're equal enough that I can start beating the shit out of women like they were men, without society throwing a hissy fit.
>>69627668
Imma virgin too anon. Wanna watch a movie together?
>>69627800
this would be great, because it certainly doesn't stop women from taking advantage of it by starting shit with men knowing full well that society looks down on women getting hit
that and them yelling rape just to get guys beat up because everyone is a fucking white knight for some reason
It's not the all female cast I have a problem with. Hell, it's not even jlaw that I have the problem with.
No. My problem is the fact that there's another fucking remake.
>>69627668
Do you post on wizardchan?I do and I think we could use another true wizard
>>69627800
You cant do that because women are special... but also equal... yet we are not allowed to hit a women cos they are delicate... yet way more stronger than men....
Fuck this makes no sense
How do you guys even cope in real life?
Had no idea seeing multiple women in tv and movies was so traumatizing.
>>69627863
wizard is but one step on my journey to become a lich
>>69627308
They will keep doing it as long as they have an agenda, remember interracial porn is not profitable but jews still produce it anyways because their hate of white people is strong than their love of money
>>69627854
But you see: taking the brand Oceans 11, Ghosbusters - this will make people wanna see it out of curiosity.
If they just made an all female movie that no on had ever heard of before, then not many would go see it.
This is the whole reason why we keep seeing reboots and sequels in Hollywood, because the big investors are afraid to take risks.
I know it fucking sucks but that is how Hollywood is run.
>>69627640
>alienating a female audience
that's not good, we need the female dollar
>alienating a male audience
women will pay for the feature
>implying I will ever pay for feminist garbage
If you pay money for this movie you should have your rights taken away
I remember when I used to want to watch Poker House and Winter's Bone to see her "chops." Shame
>>69627308
They're doing it on purpose.
Nobody in Hollywood has the actual chops to write a movie with a primarily female cast that will make money but there's social pressure to do so. The response is to make it look like they're trying by gender swapping movies with male cast members that people don't want to watch anyway.
That way the movies fail, the concept looks unworkable, and they have a convenient excuse to keep pumping out the tired old formulaic crap.
>>69627970
Can we expect to see boobies?
>>69627852
Surely, that day is now, yes?
After all, females are now allowed in combat units in the military, right?
So if they can take a 7.62 round in the head, just like a man, then they should be able to have their teeth knocked out for running their mouth, just like a man, right?
No more protecting bitches, or getting pissed off when some dude shatters a chicks jaw, right? That's only equal and fair.
>>69628032
Even if they were all walking around in bikinis the entire time you can't save this movie.
>>69627308
Money talks. Women don't want to see this forced shit any more than men. This will go the way of the dinosaur movie in the mid to lat 90s.
>>69628147
>females are now allowed in combat units in the military, right?
>>69627308
Just wait for the next democrat president. They'll be subsidizing these movies in no time.
It's all about forcing SJW propaganda now.
Like Kasdan said in an interview, he and JJ asked themselves what it would be like if the Nazis had gone to Argentina and regrouped after WWII.
From birth, Jews are raised with this idea that homogeneous white societies will inevitably result in goose-stepping, ethnic cleansing, and warmongering. And I could understand that outlook if history had begun in 1930. But the truth is, whites are the most egalitarian and least barbaric group in human history.
That's what frustrates many of us when jewish SJW Hollywood sensibilities become accepted norms. They're slanted, prejudiced and their bias goes unchallenged by everyone.
The First Order was a Jewish take on ultimate evil. And because modern Jews are obsessed with The Shoah and WWII everything magically relates to MUH SIX MILLION.
It has gotten boring. It's stale. I wish we could get a more nuanced view of evil, but that won't happen because show-biz Jews always find a way of politicizing everything.
Like, recently I saw a movie set in 1920s London. There were several shots of a black man and a white woman holding hands in the street. It was there to sell us something. It was out of place and revisionist. It's tacky and it's condescending.
The objective is to shape public opinion with the assumption that everyone needs "educating" and are too dumb to pick up on the flagrant advertising of their agenda. In this case, it was a short throwaway scene and it still took me out of the movie. The message is basically, "You're too dumb to find the right opinions by yourself, so we're going to give you direction by placing propaganda in the media you consume."
SJW placement just seems dishonest and manipulative. Flagrant product placement annoys me whether it's a product I like or not. It takes me out of the ride that it should be, pauses everything to remind me what I'm supposed to think, and then expects me to jump back in with full enthusiasm.
What the next "all female x movie," /tv/?
WOMEN SUCK LMAO
Who gives a shit, just don't fucking pay them any mind.
I've have read this whole thread and am APALLED at what I've seen. Your views on woman are totally wrong and some of you need a lesson:
To be fully accurate, women are biologically stronger than men, and don't even need sperm to create babies anymore. Using bone marrow and eggs, you can create a human fetus, and it will always come out female. Basically, chauvinistic pigs like the ones on this board are not needed anymore, and they're simply afraid of the power females could hold against them if they were to get full equality. If it came down to it, the human race could become nothing but females. Even so, much less women are found to be murderers, or committing serious crimes at all. I understand fully that there are women that do these things and more, but it is a much smaller percentage. Most, if not all, shooters in the US have been Caucasian males in privileged families. Going back to my earlier statement of women being biologically stronger; women not only mature much faster, but they produce antibodies at incredible speeds, are less susceptible to cardiovascular diseases, and woman have a much higher pain tolerance due to having to live through childbirth and other things. Not only this, but women are much less likely to suffer from recessive disorders like colour blindness, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and hemophilia. To the Sandra bullock and based JLaw haters on here: your arguments are illogical and immoral, perhaps you would feel more at home in the Dark Ages?
Are they going to steal their nude pics back in this movie?
>>69627308
It really isn't feminists, its the studios themselves.
They will do anything to stay in the black, which currently means riding social justice/feminist demo's until the wheels come off.
At the end of the day, Hollywood will only do something if they see a profit in it. For some reason they are convinced that there is money in the tumblr crowd.
>>69627440
Funny how's it's remakes that no one was clamoring for. Hollywood figured out a way to give remakes that would normally be panned and forgotten constant media coverage and immunity from negative criticism.
>>69629039
Lady Bloodsport
Do you think I'm joking?
>>69627308
>Remaking oceans 11 with an all women cast
>Missing the point of the Oceans movies all together
Hit the trash bin from the three point line tbqh
Why don't they just make an all male cast version of ya ya sisterhood, steel magnolias, that traveling pants movie etc..
>>69627670
>Blessed are the BBC takers
>>69629268
lmao tl;dr
>>69629039
When are they gonna start with making female versions of arnie movies
Female led mid-sized budget comedies have been doing pretty decently (Bridesmaids, Spy, The Heat, Pitch Perfect, Trainwreck) and studios are hoping they can combine it with reboot/remake/sequel-level. Eh.
Does it really matter if its a female-led cast? Either way, big reboot would probably be shitty anyways
>>69629759
>Does it really matter if its a female-led cast?
it only matters when its for grrl power instead of attempting to make something legitimate. if ovaries 11 was about a group of women getting together to pull a heist, it would be okay. but its about an all women oceans 11. specifically oceans 11 but with women instead, and thats how its being marketed. like with the new ghostbusters. if it was just the new generation of ghostbusters who all happen to be chicks, okay. but its not, its a remake of the first but with all women just because theyre women, and the entire crew is women just to be all women and they all even took a group picture that says girl power. thats the wrong way to go about it. thats trying to push an agenda instead of trying to make a film
>>69627308
kill yourself virgin
I don't understand, why not make their own all-female movies? It wouldn't be so stupid if they weren't just remaking male movies as female ones.
