Am I the only one expecting this to bomb? The first one did well but the film was fucking shit, it traded on early 3D novelty, and it's a sequel 6 years after the first which is way too late.
The first one only did well as it was riding off the coat tails and goodwill of Avatars success
I wanna say this will bomb, but Disney seems to have paid off all reviewers and audiences are dumber than ever (see MCU success)
>>69313306
it has bright and pretty colors
it'll make 100 million easy
>le Johnny Depp Quirky Makeup Man
>>69313388
But MCU films are perfectly decent PG-13 light action films, whereas the Alice in Wonderland is almost 2 hours of nonsensical bullshit and forced obnoxious wackiness. Alice is legitimately one of the worst films I've ever seen, akin to the most boring acid trip you can imagine.
>Rated PG
This movie is for children...
>>69313306
Holy shit I hate everything about this poster
its fucking triggers me
I've never walked out of a movie in theater but I came real fucking close to just cutting my loss and gtfo.
I was sad that I stayed and saw that stupid ass mad hatter dance.
I will not see this piece of rotting shit.
>>69313306
It reminds me I need to preorder my Mortdecai Criterion edition.
>>69313559
It's legitimately a really, really bad film, not even a meme or a pile-on thing. I watched it thinking it couldn't be THAT bad to deserve its reputation and holy shit.
I was stoked for this when the idea for the first film was announced, but then production photos came out and it looked like garbage. The 1950's animated feature film is darker in tone and better acted.
>>69316217
The idea is fine, but it's not hard to see how it went awry, as it's too easy to to take the concept and flood it with OTT special effects and wacky shit. The film didn't really benefit from playing everything as big as possible either.
>>69313306
The first one is unbelievably awful.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDhFVZwfe3c
What did he mean by this?
