>>69298011
Doesn't it have someone fucking a bull or a monkey at some point?

>Its beyond LOTR tier in terms of lore
no
>and story telling.
no

>>69298062
sumerian mythology not more involved than LOTR... confirmed for not knowing history.

Also confirmed for not reading the epic of gilgamesh

>>69298151
i have read the epic, it took me like 10 minutes.

Is that Mesopotamian mythology? Then the answer is simple:
You either get brown people to act in major roles and normies flee theaters in terror causing it to flop, or whitewash the whole thing, get sacked by critics, cut every bridge with the more leftist side of Hollywood while normies flee theaters in terror because they read in every magazine and saw in every Talk Show that you're a racist scumbag.

>>69298180
you might have read a summary champ

>>69298197
It's just a poem, hardly mythology.

when full cgi movies start looking realy good and at the same time production isn't that expensive, it's possible

>>69298214
i read the william muss-arnolt version.

the question is, what the fuck did you read since you think it has better story telling than lotr.

>>69298220
Still 2brown4downtown

>comparing some ancient darkie folk tales to a novel