Which film was your favorite?
Goblet of Fire, hands down.
>>69237621
None, I didn't watch them because I'm not a child.
>>69237639
The very same.
I was halfway through the entirety of Western canon when my classmates were enthralled by Rawling's tripe. The best present my parents ever got me was a library card.
>>69237628
that was the worst one though
3>7>6>5>2>1>8>4
>>69237694
>>69237639
the movies are better than the books could ever be plebs. once again tv has an opinion before having an opinion.
>>69237621
Prisoner of Azkaban
>>69237621
The first, because she was the hottest in that one.
>>69237694
>I'm super-duper smart and lighthearted fantasy is beneath me
>>69237842
Smarter than you for sure.
>>69237798
really bad taste she was smoking hot in the others
>>69237893
>>69237731
>the movies are better than the books could ever be
This is some next level bait right here.
The world in the books is possibly more fleshed out than Tolkien but with the added benefit of not reeking of terminal autism.
the movies are a garbage cash grab.
>>69237858
what's important is that you believe that
>>69237962
If you spent your childhood swallowing the pulp from Rawling's pen there is no reason for doubt.
>>69238027
Yes, I'm sure kid-you was much more patrican than kid-me. Congratulations
>Harry Potter
>anything but shit
Harry Potter is the definition of plebshit manufactured for uneducated morons. Get some decent taste, plebeian.
CINÉMA:
1: 夢 (1990, Kurosawa)
2: This Night (1965, Fassbinder)
3: La morte d'Isotta (1968, Schröter)
4: Reassemblage (1982, Minh Hà)
5: Кpaдeцът нa пpacкoви (1964, Radev)
6: โรงแรมนรก (1957, Pestonji)
7: قمران وزيتونة (2001, Abdelhamid)
8: ¾إشآ (1984, Zhuangzhuang)
9: Ocْنeيè ؤyّè (1975, Radev)
10: Three Kings (1999, Russell)
FILMS:
1. دècüىa ى¸pٍâoمo ÷eëoâeêa (1986, Lopushansky)
2. Un condamné à mort s'est échappé (1956, Bresson)
3. Guns of The Trees (1961, Mekas)
4. Love Streams (1984, Cassavetes)
5. êôژX½ضةظؤêڑ¢بثتآ¼ (1991, Yang)
6. Duelle (1976, Rivette)
7. Alice in den Stنdten (1974, Wenders)
8. Le Rayon Vert (1986, Rohmer)
9. Սայաթ-Նովա (1968, Parajanov)
10. Mauvais Sang (1986, Carax)
MOVIES:
1. Barry Lyndon(1975, Kubrick)
2. “Vچ‘‚ئ’nچ– (1963, Kurosawa)
3. Blue (1993, Jarman)
4. Fanny och Alexander (1982, Bergman)
5. The Long Day Closes (1992, Davies)
6. “Vچ‘‚ئ’nچ– (1963, Kurosawa)
7. Le Révélateur (2002, Philippe Garrel)
8. Providence (1977, Resnais)
9. لت§بµاأأة (2006, Weerasethakul)
10. Punishment Park (1971, Watkins)
OVERALL:
Sommaren med Monika (1953, Bergman)
êôژX½ضةظؤêڑ¢بثتآ¼ (1991, —î)
চারুলতা (1964, রায়)
Ordet (1955, Dreyer)
Les Moissons du Ciell (1978, Malick)
Oêٍےلpü «ؤecےٍü نيeé, êoٍopûe ïoٍpےcëè ىèp (1927, فéçeيٍّeéي)
؛ى¸كء» (1987, صإزصؤ±)
Fear and Desire (1953, Kubrick)
اepêaëo (1975, Tapêَâcêèé)
01010101 01101110 00100000 0100001101101000 01101001 01100101 0110111000100000 01000001 01101110 0110010001100001 01101100 01101111 01110101(1928, Luis Buٌuel)
ہثبA±¯¸è (1936, œد؟ع)
Le Révélateur (2002, Philippe Garrel)
>>69238073
I'll take your sarcastic felicitations as an admission of my superiority.
>>69237931
All that's unecessary when making a film which has different necessities the whole point of filmmaking is to be original. The films offer everything the books need and do it better with orwellian brazilian authorties. Sorry you have no analytic skills. Everything in Cuarons snd Yates is on purpose as is the nature of british filmmaking to be self depricating
>>69238194
ok
Half Blood Prince
https://www.buzzfeed.com/andyneuenschwander/proof-that-harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-had-the-mo?utm_term=.kerLxjO87#.abDmQo2GL
>>69238194
are you the same faggot that posts pics of the later HP movies' cinematography and claims that the Harry Potter film series is the greatest franchise of all time?
>>69238149
admittedly you probably have far better taste in literature than I do, but my main interest is in films so that's what I take pride in
Dh1 desu
