>the villains plot made no sense. Why did he have to lure the heroes To a Siberian military base, kill those super solders, then show the footage? Why did he have to bomb vienna and infiltrate the base to activate buckey? Why did he call the hotel so they'd find the body he hid?? He could have just released the footage like on TV or something and stark and captain America would have fought over Buckley
>Spider-Man in this is one of the most forced things I've ever seen. He has nothing to do with anything in the movie and his scenes serves no purpose. You could have cut him out, and the movie would have been exactly the same.
>Vision, Hawkeye, black panther, black widow, ant-man, Sharon carter, and Wanda could also have all been cut with no plot impact
>lots of cringe quips. " move your seat up", "I hate you", the empire strikes back etc. really bad and cringey
>the much advertised airport scene was totally irrelevant and nonsensical. Where were all the people and airport security?
>didn't kill wrmachine when the plot impact called for it. Why? Because merchandising
>no sakes or consequences, everything is exactly the same at the start
>lazy "you killed my father" motivation for everyone
>incomprehensible CGi action that resembles people banging two toys together. No weight or Brutality behind any of it.
The 91% rating is ridiculous. This is an objectively bad movie
>obnoxious giant letters every five seconds
>>69214221(you)
>DCuck damage control
>>69214303
What? I didn't even mention DC
I'm done with this Mickey Mouse-tier soap opera drama. It doesn't help either that all the fight scenes are edited by a teenager with Tourette's and Parkinson's, it's as if they want to distract the audience from how shoddy everything looks by waving a flashlight on their face. I couldn't give a damn about any of these sterile excuses for characters. During the airport scene all the artificially-inflated conflict devolved into a child playing with one toy in each hand and bashing them together.
It's riddled with sophomoric and shallow pseudo-political ponderings that are thrown out the window when the quiptastic action starts. They completely disregard for the umpteenth time the collateral damage while they're having fun showcasing their flashy abilities.
The third act pretends to get serious when in reality it turns into a cheap heartstring manipulation revolving around "why didn't you tell me Cap waaa".
This part completely disregards the fact that Stark knows all too well that brainwashing and mental manipulation is a thing, let's not forget that he has witnessed it firsthand with Banner. There's no excuse for him to have such a sudden change of heart other than to extend the conflict for another 15 minutes of mindless violence, and leave the manchildren with the impression that they've just witnessed an intricate revenge tragedy.
All smoke and mirrors, the constant quipping is an effective tool to cloud a fanboy's mind and judgement.
Finally, what's left is an entire team of "world-class" heroes that got fooled by a man wearing a Bucky mask. Not to mention that the villain's stale trope was better executed 19 years ago when Scream 2 came out, ironically, a film satirizing this cliché.
If you don't think this is cartoonish and laughable you might be too young to post on this site.
Never again.
All I know is that Iron Man did nothing wrong.
>>69214221
It's a comic book movie for fucks sake. You're supposed to sit back and enjoy it, it's meant to be fun, don't nitpick minor shit
>>69214432
>Turn off your brain bro
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435036/captain-america-superheroes-dumbed-down
>>69214432
>a basic cohesive plot is "nitpicking"
Yeah, no. Also if it had all these flaws don't rate it 91%
He had to acivtave bucky himself because he had to do everything himself, had no one else. He called the hotel so that Iron Man would find out he wasn't the real doctor when he wanted it to happen, and he wanted to show the footage in the base to tip Tony over the edge at the perfect time whereas if he just leaked it normally they probably wouldn't have fought like they did and his plan was to make them kill each other.
Everything else is subjective, and most people simply don't agree and say they like those things. Also character deaths dont magically make a movie good, the movie wouldn't somehow be better if characters died just like Batman v Superman isn't good because a character died.
Lastly, a rotten tomatoes score is not saying "X is an X/10" its an objective percentage of critics that liked and disliked it. If you look at those scores and seriously thing to yourself "WOW x got an x/10!? WTF!???? I have to complain on /tv/ about this!" you are unbelievably fucking retarded. If a movie has a high tomatoe score that means it is likeable and liked by most critics, not that its a masterpiece. Saying a movie doesn't deserve its score is fucking insane and you're literally just saying people should not like it as much because you dont like it, which is petty and childish as all fuck.
>>69214462
>>69214485
obvious bait, you guys are idiots.
>>69214629
>Marvel flicks
>>69214629
Everything besides showing the footage was unnecessary and redundant
Then you get nonsensical stuff like luring them to Siberia
There was no reason to call the hotel and expose himself
>>69214762
I would have to rewatch it to argue over this, if you're right it doesn't exactly ruin the movie or make it bad still.
>>69214424
He did several things wrong, actually and even admits as much.
The first act is disjointed and unengaging, the second act is cartoonish and plastic, and the third one is emotionally sophomoric and the characters' motivations are incongruous.