The name's Bond. James Bond.
He just has to get a hair transplant first
Look at the top of his head honestly...! Can't believe god gives him such a shitty hair genetics
>>69104075
Sean Connery was already balding when he made his first Bond film.
>>69104075
>>69104093
He's perfect
>>69104024
This movie was fucking great.
>>69104075
Have you ever seen the early Draft for Bond? him balding would be perfect.
>>69104186
I saw it last night, it was a lot of fun, though I do have my complaints.
The dialogue was odd at times and the OST was alright.
I went in blind expecting it to be a solo spy film, I was surprised when it turned into a buddy film. Pretty good would give a 7/10.
>>69104024
After such a horrible superman I don't want to watch him ruin another icon.
bruh
>>69104383
He was actually pretty good in MFU. I think him playing as bond could be even better than his role as Solo because he would be forging an American accent. He would be much more comfortable.
>>69104383
>opinions
He was literally the perfect Superman.
Say what you will about writing or the supporting characters, but Cavill did amazing with Supes.
>>69104383
>implying he wasn't a good Superman
>>69104024
Cavill is box office cancer. He can't even make money playing superman. Seriously, find me one film he did that made money. He'll never be given JB.
>>69104506
Just made money? How much Money?
Immortals, Man of Steel, and Batman/Superman all made money. They didn't rake in massive profits but they made money.
>>69104506
Daniel Craig was almost Literally Who tier before he was Casted as Bond in 2006.
>>69104662
Making money =/= making the profits that big studios want from prime franchises like Batman and Superman. While 800-900 million may be a lot, you have to remember that these movies like superman cost 200+ to make and then 200+ to market, and then studios only get half the profits of ticket sales. Man of Steel and BvS probably just covered themselves, and this not something that WB wants out of those franchises.
>>69104814
Literally who's are often more palatable to execs on big name franchises than proven losers because they come cheap and usually the franchise is big enough to carry sales on title alone.
You generally only see big names attached to big name projects when they're looking to revitalize and damage control for precious missteps in the franchise and want some extra assurance of theater attendance. The Rock is usually the go-to guy for this, it's no surprise Warner signed him for a movie that was slated to be a "2nd tier" release after a few movies in case they underperformed.
