[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Star Trek TOS
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 40
Thread images: 25
File: trekcrew.0.jpg (585 KB, 1500x1200) Image search: [Google]
trekcrew.0.jpg
585 KB, 1500x1200
This show could have been mythically epic, but:
>a bunch of episodes absolutely shit the bed
>all of their advanced technology not working 95% of the time
>hostile forces gaining full control of the ship easily, even though they had no prior knowledge of it
Don't get me wrong there were some goddamn great episodes. It could have been so much better.
>>
it was the 60s, give them a break
>>
File: 1360771288307.jpg (14 KB, 322x324) Image search: [Google]
1360771288307.jpg
14 KB, 322x324
>>68998084
it was cancelled twice in three years

what did you expect?
>>
>>68998084

Remember, this was a time when sci-fi was either weird 2001 shit, or dumb nerdy shit for dorks. Star Trek stood out at the time.
>>
>>68998084
>all of their advanced technology not working 95% of the time
>hostile forces gaining full control of the ship easily, even though they had no prior knowledge of it

There wouldn't be much tension or excitement if everything went smoothly and they instantly obliterated any threat with no resistance.

TNG was much worse with their reliance on the Holodeck to fuel plots.
>>
I'll be the first to admit that TOS hasn't aged well. But criticizing it out of context still sounds a bit like complaining that Hemingway's writing style is too simple and ordinary, or Shakespeare's work is riddled with cliches.
>>
File: 1454613474728.png (146 KB, 554x439) Image search: [Google]
1454613474728.png
146 KB, 554x439
>>68998084
TOS is great even when it's bad. Great characters, cool designs, and maximum comfy. There is literally no better show to chill to
>>
File: no.jpg (37 KB, 492x426) Image search: [Google]
no.jpg
37 KB, 492x426
>tfw hubby won't watch star trek because "it's a chick show for liberals and faggots"
>tfw printed out an episode guide for her and found it in the trash two days later
>>
>>69000670
>hubby
Are you a fat, middle-class woman in her mid-30's?
>>
>>69000086
This. It's character driven, i can't even remember any bad plots because the characters are so great, and the ambience is so comfy.

I think that's why I hated TAS, because there were no live actors and the animation was so bad.
>>
Don't forget to vote in the Star Trek movie poll.

http://www.strawpoll.me/10092308

Pic unrelated.
>>
File: 1372313302749.jpg (721 KB, 3133x2390) Image search: [Google]
1372313302749.jpg
721 KB, 3133x2390
She just wants us all to be friends.
>>
File: 1372321262617.jpg (46 KB, 720x544) Image search: [Google]
1372321262617.jpg
46 KB, 720x544
>>
>>69003407
>>69003553
what do you think a bj from her is like?
>>
File: 1372393475773.jpg (255 KB, 1200x897) Image search: [Google]
1372393475773.jpg
255 KB, 1200x897
>>
>>69003609
Divine
>>
File: higz.jpg (18 KB, 430x243) Image search: [Google]
higz.jpg
18 KB, 430x243
>>69000670
>>
>>69003609
efficient with a technique combining fellatio from every quadrant of the galaxy
>>
File: 1387594242236.jpg (2 MB, 1680x1050) Image search: [Google]
1387594242236.jpg
2 MB, 1680x1050
>>
File: 1425779068107.jpg (20 KB, 320x240) Image search: [Google]
1425779068107.jpg
20 KB, 320x240
>>
File: 1372561699812.jpg (176 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
1372561699812.jpg
176 KB, 1024x768
I should let this thread get deleted like mine. Or was it a mod?
>>
>>69003341

>insurrection wins

haha folks, very funny
>>
>>69004760
Which thread was yours? The other TOS thread expired naturally as 30 Game of Thrones threads were posted.
>>
File: image.jpg (37 KB, 528x544) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
37 KB, 528x544
>>69005022
"Commander, tell me about your sexual organs."
>>
File: 1372616070990.png (262 KB, 576x432) Image search: [Google]
1372616070990.png
262 KB, 576x432
>>
>>68998084
TOS is simply the best and most iconic. The other spinoffs can't compete; hell, normies already forgot about all of them.
Why do you think the JJ Abrams movies are so successful? TOS.
>>
File: 1372749105629.png (699 KB, 1366x768) Image search: [Google]
1372749105629.png
699 KB, 1366x768
>>
File: 1388988889224.jpg (247 KB, 672x882) Image search: [Google]
1388988889224.jpg
247 KB, 672x882
>>
File: 1451809405395.jpg (20 KB, 464x418) Image search: [Google]
1451809405395.jpg
20 KB, 464x418
>normies
pig disgusting
>>
File: 1375509987030.jpg (288 KB, 1694x2560) Image search: [Google]
1375509987030.jpg
288 KB, 1694x2560
>calling the thread a general will make us like /who/
>>
>>68999623
>I'll be the first to admit that TOS hasn't aged well.

Really? TOS in my opinion is the series that has aged the best.

Because of it's 60s camp, you let it get away with a lot more. It's also just a fun show with awesome design aesthetic.

TNG on the other hand is so fucking 80s in every way it's painful. Terrible 80s design, a fucking therapist on the command crew, shitty tape quality.
>>
File: snapshot00377.png (404 KB, 576x432) Image search: [Google]
snapshot00377.png
404 KB, 576x432
>>
File: snapshot00378.png (98 KB, 576x432) Image search: [Google]
snapshot00378.png
98 KB, 576x432
>It's Damar! It's Damar drinkin kanar!
>>
File: snapshot00364.png (253 KB, 576x432) Image search: [Google]
snapshot00364.png
253 KB, 576x432
>>
File: snapshot00379.png (171 KB, 576x432) Image search: [Google]
snapshot00379.png
171 KB, 576x432
MUH FREEDUMZ
>>
File: snapshot00380.png (212 KB, 576x432) Image search: [Google]
snapshot00380.png
212 KB, 576x432
>>
>>68998084
Don't forget control consoles that explode whenever somebody sneezes. That's one massive design flaw right there.
>>
File: 1376283303660.gif (3 MB, 288x216) Image search: [Google]
1376283303660.gif
3 MB, 288x216
bumping this general
>>
>>69010181
I don't think you know what a 'general' is
>>
File: 1143180643286.jpg (13 KB, 406x310) Image search: [Google]
1143180643286.jpg
13 KB, 406x310
>>69011661
Thread replies: 40
Thread images: 25

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.