How do they do it?
>>68974272
Paid reviews and pandering to the lowest common denominator of people: millenials who have yet to hit the real world.
Follow the source material well.
Doesn't act like it's above popcorn flick status
>>68974365
Welcome to blockbusters.
>How do they do it?
They have competent people who love the source material making the movies.
Do what? Make consistently mediocre flicks?
Aside from ironman and GOTG of course
>>68974272
Paid reviews
Not to mention most marvel movies are poorly made, their scores and cinematography is always shit
>>68974272
They have a refined formula they stick to with their main entries that absolutely prints money, then put out a couple that don't but can ride coattails to profitability to preserve an aura of artistic integrity.
>>68974417
Don't you have some Suicide Squad thread to shill, 1.jpg?
>>68974417
Consistently mediocre is still better than genuine dogshit like a Snyder flick.
>>68974471
>paid reviews
Look at the money these movies make, if they do, is because people like them, and those critics are among those people.
You just have different opinions and the fact that the masses don't even know what cinematography is, nobody cares about pretty shots.
>>68974365
>>68974417
>>68974471
DCucks assemble
>>68974393
>Follow the source material well
Nope.
>>68974272
by shitting the most inoffensive movies ever
>>68974601
Truly a visionary on the level of Snyder.
>>68974272
By playing it safe every time and making movies that feel tonally and aesthetically similar with few exceptions.
>>68974272
They're incredibly inoffensive and they've recruited likeable actors.
Like everything Disney.
>>68974644
>By playing it safe every time
How?
>>68974272
Likeable cast, and likeable characters, plus even kids can see them.
Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public.
>>68974815
Except Snyder.
>>68974641
Uh-oh
>>68974858
>underrated planks of wood
>cute old hag
They hire directors and producers that understand what comic book characters are, entertainment. When you flip the last page of a comic book you want to be thinking "yeah this was worth 2 bucks" and when you walk out of a marvel movie you want to be saying "yeah that was worth 10 bucks".
DC is trying to be something it's not...serious. I own a batman comic where he fights a fucking werewolf. I own another one where he's battling Nazis. Comics have always been fantastical, mindless entertainment with few exceptions.
I really fucking hope the solo Batman movie is good, because besides Suicide Squad I no longer have any desire to watch any DC related filmswhich sucks
>>68974542
It's still not very good, though, is it? Really you shouldn't be wasting your time with any capeshit.
>>68974858
>Hans Zimmer
>good
>people are excited for Leto's Joker
>people thought Snyder is a good director
>Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman
Literally the only good things about the movie was Ben Affleck and the visuals.
>>68974562
>Watching any capeshit at all
That's pretty emarrassing
>>68974899
This also makes me wonder why people want movies to be 100% faithful to the comics when Age of Ultron already had some backlash due to overquipping.
I mean, in the comics, Thanos accidentally let's go of the cube that gave him powers and gets arrested by the NYPD.
Not to mention the motherfucking Thanos-copter.
>>68974272
paid reviews work wonders, add the fact that the average capeshitter has an iq of 80, they don't need anything else
Pandering to the plebs. Literally the Call of Duty of cinema.
>>68974921
>Really you shouldn't be wasting your time with any capeshit
>you shouldn't watch entertaining action flicks
What you shouldn't be doing is take part in comic book console wars.
>>68974997
They are not dumb, dumb people are the ones who think these movies have some sort of phylosophical meaning.
People watch them to be entertained for 2 hours.
>>68974993
Oh god the Thanos-copter. I deleted that from my brain and you just triggered me.
>>68974771
Using accessible, easy to digest archetypal plot lines, lighthearted family friendly humor, charming and attractive lead actors, action that is not too scary or disquieting, always letting the hero win and bending over backwards not to defy the expectations of a general audience. I know "comfy" is seen as a meaningless buzzword, but the Disney formula is the perfect example of cinematic "comfiness."
>>68974272
They give the audience what they want, cape shit
They make the most concentrated, pure form of of perfect cape shit possible. Are you then really fucking surprised that cape shit fans eat it up?
Just look at DNC, they tried to make a non-cape shit movie out of cape shit material, and they failed. And yes when you can barely pull a mediocre movie out of your ass with SM and BM as WW as material, you fucking failed.
>>68974993
Ultron quipping made sense in the context of the movie, his personality was styled after Stark's.
The overquipping is due to Whedon being a terrible writer.
>>68974272
Golden Virginia of the film industry
>>68975052
I'm not though. I don't give a shit about DC or Marvel.
>Entertaining action flicks
They're incredibly boring unless you have an interest in comic books and a lot of the action is mediocre if not sub par.
>>68975081
You're just describing good things in a dismissive way.
You're saying their funny, non-pretentious and charming.
Oh what horror.
Compare them to BvS.
Can you give the same spin to it?
>>68974771
YeS, nigger. TELL ME HOW GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY WAS NOT A SAFE MOVIE. TELL ME HOW IT WAS THE RISKIEST THING SINCE ERASERHEAD! I DARE YOU!
>>68975134
The effects of Golden Virginia on the film industry
>>68975070
It was never canon
>>68975063
Dumb people are easily entertained
>>68975126
Civil war had more quips and shitty jokes, but you probably ate it up anyway.
>>68975231
No, it didn't, 1.jpg, you are just a mad as fuck DCfag desperate because the DCEU is in flames.
>>68975157
That's not being dismissive. Everything he said is correct. Superhero movies are the embodiment of mass appeal/lowest common denominator.
>>68975137
I wasn't saying you were taking part in comic book console wars.
>They're incredibly boring
It's almost like "entertaining" is subjective.
So capeshit isn't your cup of tea, what of it?
Should your disinterest detract from people's enjoyment of the films?
>>68975255
>mass appeal/lowest common denominator.
In what way?
>>68975231
>Civil war had more quips and shitty jokes
So basically, you haven't seen the movie.
>>68974272
That's how.
>>68975231
>Civil war had more quips and shitty jokes
>I literally haven't seen the movie but I'll shit talk it anyway
Oh wait, we're in /tv/
>>68975290
I don't need to see it to know what type of writing Whedon does.
>>68975231
It might be a reusing of the same formula but it might be the "best" of that formula
>>68974365
this
>>68975322
Whedon was fired a year ago.
The writers and directors of Civil War are the ones from The Winter Soldier.
>>68974974
Superhero movies aren't capeshit, capeshit is capeshit. TDK good movie, Thor Capeshit.
>>68975322
The moment Age of Ultron got worse critical reception than Avengers 1 they just kicked him out and put Russos in charge of both CW and Infinity War.
>>68975322
Wew lad
How does it feel being retarded?
>>68975081
>Using accessible, easy to digest archetypal plot lines, lighthearted family friendly humor, charming and attractive lead actors, action that is not too scary or disquieting, always letting the hero win and bending over backwards not to defy the expectations of a general audience. I know "comfy" is seen as a meaningless buzzword, but the Disney formula is the perfect example of cinematic "comfiness."
People aren't dumb anyway. They know Marvel is doing the same movie over and over, AoU and Ant-Man were the last straw and Marvel got shit for it.
>>68975374
TDK is capeshit
>>68974365
Hello my easily offended millennials!
>>68974272
By changing characters to niggers, or turning them into faggots even though they had girlfriends, or turning bimbos into dykes..
>>68975400
>Stephen McFeely
Obviously a non de plume, you stupid fuck
>>68974272
together
>>68975374
TDK is capeshit, is a superhero movie that had a villain with a good performance.
>>68975157
>You're just describing good things in a dismissive way.
No, I'm describing things that you personally like. Family friendly humor is not the same thing as "they're funny." Jame's Gunn's "Super" was also "funny," but a general audience would not be nearly as receptive to that movie as they were to Guardians of the Galaxy. "Non-pretentious" is completely relative. I don't think "Dark Knight" or "X-men 2" are terribly pretentious, but neither of those feel like Disney-Marvel films.
>Compare them to BvS.
I didn't like that movie. So...No.
>>68975322
Not by Whedon, different writers. Whedon is (so far) Avengers exclusive.
Now that the dust has settled, can we agree that a Dark Horse franchise would save capeshit?
>>68975070
>it has his name on the side as though he's worried someone will steal it
>>68975322
>Whedon
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>68975442
Suggesting that anyone hired by Marvel isn't Whedon 2.0. All marvel hacks are Whedon fanboys.
>>68975442
But not Whedon, he along with Markus are the ones who wrote TWS.
Whedon has always been the cancerous fuck who wrote all those quips, and there's a reason why he's no longer going to make Infinity War.
>>68975290
But it's actually less serious than age of ultron.
Joss whedons avengers only had 2 comic relief characters.
Civil war had 5.
>>68974365
Actually giving their fans what they want. Unlike DC.
>>68974365
>DCucks
>mfw 28%
>>68974993
>Whedon
he's gone now for good
>>68975456
Would be awesome
Don't know if it's Dark Horse, but y'all heard of Dredd tv show potential?
>>68975503
No it isn't, 1.jpg, your opinion is irrelevant.
See how you can't mention any examples, and if you do, it will be about the leaked airport fight?
Off topic but requesting Sansa Stark as Jean Grey look at the top of her head image.
>>68975503
>But it's actually less serious than age of ultron
>Civil war had 5 comic relief characters
Go ahead, name them.
I'll give you a hand by giving you Spider-Man and Ant-Man.
>>68975506
Marvel fans only want capeshit nonsense instead of trying to do something.. anything, original.
>>68975486
So all your argument relies on things you are guessing?
>>68975576
If you want something original stop watching capeshit
>>68975503
>Joss whedons avengers only had 2 comic relief characters.
>Civil war had 5.
Got thing backwards. Joss made everyone quip, thought this can be justified because Spidey wasn't there to calm the audience when something serious was going on.
>>68975577
No, it's that all the writers for Marvel, post Whedon, have been desperately trying to copy his style. It's not hard to tell
>>68974393
>Follow the souce material well
Nice meme
>>68975503
No, Whedon had ALL the Avengers be comic reliefs aside from Vision and Wanda.
>>68975632
>have been desperately trying to copy his style
How can one person be this retarded
>>68975632
No, they haven't.
There's a reason why TWS was acclaimed and why they put that crew in charge.
>>68975571
Antman
Spiderman
Hawkguy
Falcon
Ironman (not as much as he did in ironman 3)
>>68975604
Right because capeshit isn't original. Nolan wasn't the first to implement IMAX to the cinema screen for blockbusters. Don't generalise based on content. Content doesn't have to inform the medium.
>>68975489
I think Whendon went full-quip because he initially did Iron Man and that character has a quick wit about him. But then he just wrote everyone exactly like Iron Man.
The snarky witted nature of Stark/Iron Man was perfect...but for other characters it just felt shoehorned in.
They don't have this HACK that says he would rape batman
>DUDE KILLING AND RAPE LMAO
>>68975632
>No, it's that all the writers for Marvel, post Whedon, have been desperately trying to copy his style. It's not hard to tell
Only thor 2 you can maybe say that about it.
>>68975677
You wanna say that all marvel movies haven't been quippy and whedonny post whedon. Come on. It's not hard to identify the similarities in tone since he was involved.
>>68975689
>Iron Man
>comic relief
See how you haven't seen the movie?
You are just a desperate DCfag spamming those DC related pictures because you don't want Civil War to be the success it is.
You spent the entire month damage controlling for the disaster that BvS was, and you also tried shilling both Suicide Squad and X-Men Apocalypse out of pure hatred, and nothing is going to work.
>>68975689
There's a difference between being a comic-relief and quipping.
But I guess you wouldn't know the difference in characterizations, being a DCuck.
>>68975723
Iron Man 3, definitely. Guardians of the Galaxy was a whedon fest.
>>68975691
Implementing IMAX doesn't make your film any more original
>>68975732
TWS wasn't.
>>68975696
>because he initially did Iron Man
John favero would like to beat you to death.
>>68975732
They haven't.
The Captain America movies especially haven't been "quippy and whedonny".
>>68975611
>>68975646
That's another problem.
The characters were all different shades of spidey before he came, they'd all quip.
Russo's slightly muted their whitty personalities in order to make Spiderman the full quipper
>>68975786
Ok, but the innovation was impressive. As was the direction he took the film in the genre. The story being told was so rebellious of the genre. He took the genre and reinvigorated and changed it forever.
>>68975855
>slightly
See how you haven't seen the movie?
How you are just a desperate DCfag because you know very well that CW is a success and BvS was a failure?
>>68975799
True, TWS wasn't. Congrats. One film.
>>68975273
Are you honestly trying to argue that the Marvel movies do not have mass appeal?
>>68975776
Are you stupid all the director have done comedies before the ones for CAP 2 I don't know haven't looked in to them.
>>68975816
Have you seen Chef?
>>68975855
>1.jpg
You don't know how much i'm enjoying your buttmad and your sad tries at arguing over a movie you haven't watched.
>>68975902
The same but different. Hollywood's masturbatory motto.
>>68975442
>non de plume
>non
hahaha
>>68975863
Yes but pretty much every movement in the capeshit/blockbuster genre comes about solely due to how much money a film made.
>>68975909
Have you seen Swingers?
>>68975895
Yes, and the guys who directed and wrote TWS are both in charge of CW and Infinity War movies and they are giving advice on shaping up Phase 3, and you can see that in Civil War.
>>68975936
DE PLUMME
>>68975909
What does Chef have anything to do with John Favreau, not Joss Whedon, directing Iron Man.
>>68975902
Of course not.
I'm just curious to what aspects of them are designed for mass appeal?
Like what specifically about them?
>>68975953
True, that doesn't deny the impact it had though. Granted, immitations are shite. And the future will reflect on TDK series as mediocre because of it's implementations and repetition that it created, but for now. It's pretty good.
The power of quips compels youuu...
>>68975758
>>68975766
>>68975882
>Having a civil Civil War discussion
>Dude imma bring DC in it coz I wanna start a company war
"This window will close in 3 seconds"
>>68975855
Why are you trying to make it seem like you know what you are talking about when you are just making blind guesses based on things you have read?
And why are you still spamming DC related pics?
That butthurt?
>>68975799
See, here's the thing with the problem with the way people discuss these movies. Everyone seems to compare them to themselves. Was TWS less light and quippy compared to GOTG and AOU? Sure. Now fucking compare it to Antichrist or the Godfather. Yeah, it's still a general audience targeted family film.
They brought the solo films out before the actual film they wanted to bring out first (The Avengers)
They knew the average normie casual would have had no idea who Ironman, Thor, basically the whole team except for the Hulk was, so they brought out the solo films, the viewers got to see who they were, their origins. If they would have brought out the Avengers first most normies who have never read a comic or watched the cartoons would be like "Right I know that's the Hulk but who are the rest"
The films are light hearted with lots of fun quips which the audience seems to like
The problem with the DC films is they feel rushed. A lot of shit happened in batman vs superman. They should have followed suit, brought out all the solo films then the JL film because, the average normie will have no idea who wonder woman, the flash, definitely cyborg and Aquaman are
For example
>show the batman vs superman trailer to my friends girlfriend who comes to watch capeshit films with us
>we are in a party so she takes my phone into the bathroom to watch the trailer
>Its the trailer with the first showing of wonder woman
>she comes out the bathroom, hands me the phone and says "that looks, great, batman and superman look amazing but who's the woman standing in the middle of them"
As for the TV shows. DC TV shows are good but they are made for teenagers and they are on cable TV so they are watered down alot with shit CGI whereas Marvel TV shows are on Netflix and made for adults so they are a bit darker, more violent, and have bigger budgets so the sets look a lot better
>>68976005
The action, humour, visuals and subject matter.
See>>68975081
>>68976040
But he is, spamming DC images with 1.jpg in the filename, he's just a permanently asshurt fanboy who can't get over the fact that Snyder ruined everything.
In fact he's also an Olsen waifufag, so I wouldn't be surprised if that was you.
>>68976083
You literally just listed every aspect of any movie.
>>68976043
Good point. The level of originality within the franchise is significant, but the limitations of the franchise are quite severe.
>>68976063
Oh and if you are wondering why i keep going on about normies, well they are the biggest demographic when buying over priced tickets to see capeshit films
>>68976122
Aren't norms the general audience. The general audience aren't the creators. They watch whatever is available. It's up to the producers to give the normies something worthwhile. People are going to pay anyway, cheap people give cheap shows, good producers give them something worth paying for.
>>68976108
>ITP: literally a retarded person.
>>68976108
There are more aspects to a film than those. The way in which superhero movies implement and present those aspects lends them to mass appeal.
>>68976043
The point was about MCU flicks being "whedonny" in writing, not about their mass appeal, you retard.
The Winter Soldier wasn't "whedonny".
>>68976184
>The way in which superhero movies implement and present those aspects lends them to mass appeal.
Which way is that?
>>68976043
That's not what we were discussing, people were saying that everyone was copying Whedon when the ones in charge of the MCU right now are precisely the ones who tried to make everything more serious.
>>68976063
No bull shitting WB should have made a Justice Friends movie instead.
>>68976040
dude where did you watched that? i dont want to pay to watch that thing
>>68975850
Aside from Civil War. That's whedon tier.
Quips aren't bad, they should be managed properly and delivered at the right time.
Something whedon did that the Russo's couldn't
>>68976200
Christ almighty you're dense.
See>>68975081
>>68975988
Nothing, I was fucking with you.
Also sweet dubs.
>>68976258
t. mad as fuck DCuck
>>68976252
Don't pay for it.
There's a cam rip floating around, but it's in Spanish
>>68976189
>The Winter Soldier wasn't "whedonny".
>Female character beats up men 3X her weight without ever getting hit
>Not just one death fake out, but two
>Shy man bold woman dynamic
>Overall plot about "Freedom"
>People having casual conversations in battle
It was very Whedonny.
The main difference was that it was good.
>>68976258
What went wrong anon?
Why was BvS such a gigantic failure in everything?
Why are all directors jumping off the sinking ship that the DCEU is?
>>68976122
you are the normie, idiot.
>>68976258
>Civil War was Whedon tier
Okay, Mr. 1.jpg.
Just fucking kill yourself.
>>68976320
I never said i wasn't a normie
>>68976258
I love that you are just projecting what you wanted Civil War to be due to pure anger towards Marvel and being in complete denial over DC's failure.
Can't wait for CW to surpass BvS in a couple of days.
The asshurt is going to be astronomical.
>>68976258
This.
>Star wars reference in the middle of a battle
>Orange slices
>>68976356
Far from fucking normal mate
>>68976308
holy shit fag you're so DCtraded that you literally retarded your peanut mind.
They have a really simple-minded audience.
>>68976389
Why so in denial anon?
It's pretty much consensus that CW is quite more serious than TWS.
>>68976261
But that post doesn't actually say anything and is sometimes wrong
>Simple plots
If anything, the MCU are convoluted.
>Family friendly humour
How is that a bad thing? Not enough piss jars?
>Charming and attractive actors
Holy fuck, this is a complaint?
>The good guys win at the end
Not edgy enough?
>Bending over backwards for the audience
In what way?
>>68974365
You sound millennial, grow up and understand what a good movie is.
>>68976389
>Star wars reference in the middle of a battle
Made complete sense in the context of the scene
>Orange slices
>I have never done any sports when I was a kid
>>68974858
LOOK AT THIS DEWED
UH OH OH OH OH OH OH NO
>>68976389
Yeah, and the whole "depends how hard you hit me"
It took the tension away from the whole battle.
And the whole
"Brooklyn" thing between cap and Spiderman
>>68974365
>be DC
>make a bunch of shitty movies
>Blame paid reviews or ignorant fans for their failures
Nope.
>>68975231
Didn't Batman v Superman have that shitty friend and cape quip?
THREAD THEME
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYKeQczkFfM&feature=youtu.be
>>68976517
How much of a coincidence that you can't name a single thing outside the airport battle, 1.jpg.
You probably can't even mention a single thing of the final fight.
You are so mad.
>>68976456
I never said any of those are detriments (although the make the movie devoid of any artistic merit). They are simply the elements that lend those movies to mass appeal.
>>68976530
HAHAAHA
SO FUNNY
HAHAHAAHA
>>68976529
There are three or four jokes in the movie. Compare that to Civil War, which averages tree or four jokes per page.
>>68976583
lmao mad DCuck
>>68976517
Had that feeling watching it too.
The last battle wasn't as good too.
>>68976594
No it doesn't.
Outside of the airport fight there's barely any jokes.
Hell, after the airport fight there's not a single one.
>>68976620
Why not?
It was pretty powerful.
>return home from college on Friday
>want to see a movie that isn't civil war
>civil war has literally removed every other movie from theaters in my area
I'm not going to see it on that principle GOD FUCKING DAMN REEEEEEEEEEE
ONE DOT JAY PEE GEE
>>68976699
What's even out right now?
Jungle book?
>>68976620
>>68976583
Don't bother replying him, he's a chronic shitposter.
And if you're looking for good action scenes, DC is the way to go, nothing against marvel but the Russo's cant do action.
>>68976725
I want to see the Green Room.
Thursday is the last day it shows anywhere, then civil war removes it all.
Guess I gotta pre-order it on iTunes... darn.
>>68976763
1.jpg, are you Snyder?
>>68976763
>the Russo's cant do action.
>>68976699
Subtle :^)
>>68976763
> Russo's cant do action.
Are you daft?
>>68976815
Jump cuts every second, obvious stunt doubles and shaky cam.
You think that's good action?
DC and X-men on general have better action.
Hell, even whedon did it better than the Russo's.
>>68976973
The poor DCuck has finally lost it.
>>68976973
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYKeQczkFfM&feature=youtu.be [Embed]
>>68976517
Wanda even said to Hawkeye that hes pulling his punches because he doesnt want to hurt Natasha. Get fucked.
>>68977016
I've finally found the laugh to go with this face.
>>68976763
>>68976973
Is the x men universe better story/character wise?
>>68976973
Now this is shitposting.
>>68977057
On movies it's probably the most broken story and with most retcons.
In fact, Days of Future Past erased every single X-Men movie aside from First Class from the canon due to how much of a clusterfuck the story was.
>>68977057
It's okay, but X-Men 3, and the two Wolverine movies are really bad plus there's a lot of plot holes among everything.
Probably because it came out way sooner and they didn't care much about keeping the as tight as it's not custom to do.
>>68976973
>DC action
>No stakes
>Gas'em up, hit him, gas'em up, hit him
>Dodge/hit, dodge/hit
>Stunt doubles
>Bland mario videogame action
>Marvel and Fox action
>Stakes are high
>Actually creative and uses interesting places
>Shaky cam and jump cuts to create tension which is only used in first act (you can clearly see from B-Roll footages that wire work is most heavy)
>CGI is creative
>Real actors
Will DC ever recover?
>>68977057
I think the X-men movies are up there. They on average they are superior to marvel films and sort of compete with nolans DC
Ironman and GOTG give them a run for their money
>>68976973
Are you kidding?
Nolan's trilogy's action scenes were awful, and in MoS and BvS they are 100% CGI clusterfucks, and it doesn't use the kind of CGI that looks good.
>>68977107
>Evansposter calls other people shitposters
Haha
>>68977217
>They on average they are superior to marvel films and sort of compete with nolans DC
>on average
>when 3 of them are some of the worst superhero movies ever made
Why is 1.jpg so focused on being wrong every single time?
>>68977217
Why are you talking to yourself? :^)
>>68977217
You are trash, DCuck.
>>68977217
So DC is Kino
Fox is Cinema
And marvel is quiptigraphy flick?
>>68977324
DC is sinking ship right now.
http://www.flickeringmyth.com/2016/05/the-week-in-movies-dc-expanded-universe-in-crisis-mode-director-leaves-project-rogue-one-a-star-wars-story-character-revealed-lara-croft-cast-and-more/
>>68974393
They fucked up with Ultron's origin, one of the best and most dangerous Marvel villains of all time.
Holy shit, how is so hard to make a Terminator tier movie that all Avengers that survived need to go back to the past and stop this motherfucker robot to destroy all mankind or the opposite.
>>68974272
DC should give their movie rights to Marvel
>>68977217
So pre Snyder DC lol
>>68977380
Because Whedon.
There's a reason why they fired him even though he has made the two most succesful superhero movies in history.
>>68977360
DELETE THIS
>>68977380
>>68977412
Whedon is actually better than the Russo's, by miles.
Ultron had his flaw, but he was pretty close to his comic book counterpart.
Meanwhile, zemo is possibly the worst adapted villain, hell, character in all of cbm history
>>68977540
It was way more fun when you were more sublte.
>>68977380
Avengers Age of Ultron doesn't have anything to do with Age of Ultron the comic book.
And you're retarded if you actually wanted a "lel let's just to go back to the past to fix everything :)" storyline for the movie.
And pretty much the only thing they changed with Ultron's origin is that instead of Hank Pym, Ultron was created by Tony Stark.
And Ultron still had daddy issues with Stark, and his personality was molded after Tony.
,
>>68977540
>Fools the fucking avengers by cosplaying Bucky
LEL
>>68977249
>1.jpg
Haha
>Orange slices
Didn't know Joss was still writing.
>>68977587
I actually wanted this universe timeline, plus time travel, if Stark is the creator of Ultron.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFdsIU-2NCI
>>68974272
They have the dumb people niche market covered.
It's a rather large one.
>>68977780
>Actively hunting a filename
Cringggeee
>>68977395
Oh, cool! I saw this joke on Half in the Bag too!
>>68977859
>being 1.jpg
Oy vey
>>68974946
Batfleck and Zimmer's score were the best things. Mock him all you want but Hans Zimmer is partially responsible for the success Inception, The Dark Knight trilogy, and any success BvS had.
>>68977540
>DCEU Lex Luthor
>Basically Joker
>People hate it
Is audience finally waking up?
>>68977957
no, I am 1.jpg
>>68978055
The grimdark and muh serious capeshit fad died with TDKR.
Also with the fact that Snyder makes terrible movies.
>Evansposter
>Incharge of being subtle
We see you :^)
>>68978081
Bane?
>>68978192
PosterS you mean.
