Why is the art work for new star wars canon novels so shit?
>>68961633
I have no idea, why don't you tell me?
Looks fine to me, uses up all the space, colors goes with the style, nice lines, seems modern and updated other than the classic romance novel style they used from the 70's
what's wrong anon?
>>68961761
>what's wrong anon?
I don't know. I can't quite put my finger on it. Just something off about these new canon novels.
Old star wars novels had a certain feel to them. It felt real and grainy. These new stuff just looks so bland and crafted by CEOs in board meetings or something.
>>68961826
nice man you fit in now
because new star wars canon is shit
>>68961891
>because new star wars canon is shit
Reminder in new canon darth maul is still alive in the force awakens.
>>68961918
nah. all we know is the he's still alive in between ep 1 and ep 4. even before disney bough out star wars; darth maul's fate was unknown
>>68961761
>uses up all the space
Not a good thing if its just fluff
>colors & lines
lol posterise photoshop filter
>seems modern
Modern is shit? Sounds about right
>>68961826
>cut and paste screengrabs from the movies
"Claudia Gray is the pseudonym of Amy Vincent, an American writer of paranormal romance young adult fiction, best known for the Evernight series."
Fuck off
>>68961944
>darth maul's fate was unknown
He was fairly young in episode 1, in his 20ish back than. So he would be in this 80ish in the force awakens, plus we don't know how long his species can live for. For all we know he can live a 1,000 years or more.
>>68962003
But but but muh new york times best seller!
>>68961826
That's a terrible cover. Take off your nostalgia goggles
>>68962020
Until they depicted him as a somewhat weary old man during that Rebels episode. Then again, throughout the episode his body seemed to reverse in age. For now all we know is that he flew off in Vader's tie fighter.
