https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpMy62zin2A
>Rey isn't a Mary sue
This dude is retarded.
>>68959705
who the fuck gives a shit about the opinion of a fat tranny-fucking fruit-fetishist?
Enough about SJWs, tumblr and Bridesbusters already. Change the fucking record.
based
>>68959705
>the AA
Couldn't you find someone else?
This guy is cancer. And I'm not saying that because he's an atheist: I'm too.
>hate SJWs
>support bernie sanders
AA is still a huge cuck.
The Amazing Atheist almost makes me wish I believed in God. Him and the 90% of liberal cucks who comprise atheism.
If misogyny is the reason people dislike this then why is Bridesmaids so well liked?
Does it occur to these people that something can be shit regardless of the gender of the actors?
>>68960576
BUT THE YOUTUBE TRAILER!
THE YOOOOOOOU TUBE TRAILER!
IF I WAWS SJW THIS IS WHAT WE TALK ABOUT!
EMPIRICAL OBJECTIVE PROOF OF THE TYRANNY OF MAN UPON THE SOVEREIGN SOIL OF THE MATRIARCHY!
Personally I like the story of Tiamat as proof of the change from Matriarchy to Patriarchy, but that's like 1500 BC...
Oh man, what kind of loser actually sits through these videos?
Watching youtube personalities is easily among the most uncool things a person could do.
>>68959705
I want the copy-pasta of the pic.
>>68961408
He says while writing on 4chan.
>>68961362
Its one of these big projects meant to further their cause.
What? You think this is supposed to be entertainment?
>>68961442
Sometime about about a thousand times less lame than watching talentless jackoffs rant about stuff they saw on reddit.
>>68961442
To be fair thats still cooler
>>68961442
He says, while replying to someone criticizing something on youtube, on fourchan, while on 4chan.
>>68961190
I don't get it. How does supporting Sanders make you a cuck exactly?
>>68961551
He let BLM take over his rally.
lol
>>68961355
He inadvertently proved Gods existence by showing the perfect design of the bananana.
>>68959705
>top post on reddit
Stopped watching there, also
>fucks himself with a banana
Lmao what a fucking loser
>>68961355
I don't really believe in god but I acte like a devout catholic to piss off these kind of liberal
>>68961616
>>68961630
So this is more about memes than his policies?
>>68961764
You have summed up the reason Trump is winning in that sentence.
>>68961764
>his policies
>>68959705
Who cares when we have this wonderful little specimen right here?
>>68961835
Which is sad for obvious reasons.
>>68961842
Put whatever point you're trying to make in your own words, not some lazy, half assed attempt at summoning an argument through a jpeg.
>>68961925
Ugly and unfunny
>>68961986
>>68961986
>>68961986
>>68961986
>people think the election isnt completely rigged
>implying hillary hasnt been bought the presidency like 10 years ago
>implying sanders even stands a chance
>implying trump isnt a false flag attempt to usher in hillary despite her being corrupt as fuck and a known fraud
>>68962218
How is he so based?
>>68959705
Watching half way through and notice I've heard that voice somewhere before. Realised its the Amazing Atheist. You had to post that banana stuffing asshole.
>>68959705
>click video
>"The Amazing Atheist"
>loud sigh in the first 2 seconds
Closed the video, senpai. The trailer has tons of dislikes, that speaks for itself. I don't need a stupid reaction video to point that shit out to me. Don't care about muh soggy knee either.
>>68961842
>Policies in a tiny as fuck, under populated country surrounded by economically stronger European countries would definitely have the same faults in every country similar policies are applied to, no matter the difference in size or situation.
>>68961842
The "Everyone wants the American Dream" line is completely random and has no relation to the rest of the article.
The American Dream is dead. People in America don't make it either, I know first hand how many poor people there are. Other countries are doing fine, maybe not Denmark, but the US and Denmark seem to be two extremes that both don't work out. The way to go is probably somewhere in the middle.
>>68962218
>not exactly a model for human rights
He's aware, woods you dolt. The point is even a barbaric country has decency to give leave
>>68962218
>China has killed female infants
What. It's not like government comes knocking if you give birth to a girl.
It's mainly poor farmers/whatever that kills them off cause a boy will be more useful.
>>68962401
>>68962337
>>68962414
>punishing everyone else because a woman gets knocked up
>decency
>>68962284
Quite the opposite, really.
Sanders acknowledges the human rights abuses that Woods then faults him for, wile doing it in a far more mature way.
Woods, meanwhile, grossly oversimplifies the issue, with a comment that tries to make it sound like the Chinese government murders baby girls, when the reality of the situation is that the government is actively opposed to it, and imposes heavy fines and jail sentences for those caught doing it, while simultaneously providing methods of female babies to be storked.
If anything, Woods' lack of knowledge proves Sanders' point even more: China actually has a fairly good safety net set up to protect those in need of protection within it's society.
>>68962548
It's punishing literally everyone else if a woman gets time off to care for a child?
Are you a sociopath, or just a wannabe free market capitalist who's never actually had children?
>>68962440
>>68962129
>>68962218
>>68962102
>memes
And I'll refer to what I said originally >>68961986
>The Amazing Atheist
NopeFuck this movie though.
>>68962635
>If anything, Woods' lack of knowledge proves Sanders' point even more: China actually has a fairly good safety net set up to protect those in need of protection within it's society.
That isn't the point Sanders is trying to make, though.
>>68962635
>people should be paid for not working
Please don't vote.
>The Amazing Atheist
his's bananas
>>68962635
Yeah, it is. Where do you think the money for paid leave comes from? If a woman wants time off, fine, but she shouldn't be paid for it.
If she wants the time and the money, get AFLAC, they have coverage for that sort of thing. Oh, no, no, though, that would take personal responsibility.
>>68961618
>>68959705
Movie could still be great if they executed Melissa McCarthy in the first 5mins of the movie.
But that won't happen.
Shame it will hurt Kristen wiigs career she's alright