Me too, Deborah. Me too.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/04/i-swear-this-is-the-last-marvel-film-i-see-captain-america-reviewed/
That helmet looks hilarious. Like for retards.
>>68870857
do you like money anon? I'll pay you to DELETE THIS
.t Walt Disney
>>68870882
A as in assburgers
>>68870857
So mad
>>68870857
BASED DEBORAH IS BASED!
>>68870857
>female reviewers
>>68870883
Ill pay you money to delete the 28%.
T. Snyder.
>>68870857
it has emotional depth, but like the kid-section of a pool
which is pretty deep for marvel movies
still good movie, though
>>68870857
>the comments section are literally saying YOU JUST DONT LIKE SUPERHERO MOVIES
jesus christ that's some weird damage control. It's the second bad review and capecuck are crying over it
>those butthurt comments
>They all said, at last, a decent Avengers movie with ‘emotional depth’ and ‘moral complexity’, and now I have to question what planet they’re living on.
>Seriously, if this is ‘emotional depth’ and ‘moral complexity’ then my old cat Daphne can play the ukulele, which clearly she cannot.
Hmm, you mean the critics that weren't flown to the premiere a month early were less keen on it than ones who were?
>>68870979
>implying Snyder gives a fuck
Women are incapable of understanding friendship between men.
>>68870900
How come Americans always clap when they laugh?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nILg35Hubt4
>people overanalyze things they like and look for deeper meaning where it doesn't exist
Color me shocked. People have been doing that with books and art for as long as they've existed.
>>68871055
Also friendship between billionaires who lie to the legal guardians of 15 year old boys to sneak them out of the country for a few days undetected.
>>68871055
This. Caps and Bucky don't become a couple in the movie so they are mad and think there's no "emotional depth."
>>68870993
>which is pretty deep for marvel movies
This is the plague of modern criticism. It's always "it's actually good, for ______". Marvel, DC, whatever shitstorm CGI garbage, it's always playing on a handicap. It's not a good movie. It's good for a Marvel/DC/CGI Garbage/Thoughtless Retard movie."
The Rotten Tomatoes scores reflect that. It's not 90 plus % for a movie. It's 90 plus % for "that kind" of movie. The rating is useless.
>>68870921
>frog posting
No offense to her but she doesn't understand the emotional depth of being a loyal friend. Woman tend to sabotage and resent their friends, they wouldn't have any idea what its like to have the friendship Captain and Buck had, they were friends before they became super soldiers and through all this shit they are still loyal to each other. Most of the people who bash this film on here don't understand either because they don't have any friends in real life.
>>68870857
I actually agree. But what I find incredible is how badly some characters forget about shit. Something I liked about the original Iron Man was (besides RDJ being made to play Tony Stark) that Tony actually feel real, a real spoiled billionaire merchant of death and his time under the Taliban and his escape and the sacrifice of of a fellow prisoner so he could escape gave him a lot of character that he later completely forgot in order to build new traumas or whatever. And Tony is the only MCU character that actually feels like a real person and not some plain character with no personality like 99% of the avengers, at least until Antman came around.
It is impossible to get connection to most of this characters because of how they were portrayed in their movies.
>So we have Captain America (that big chump Chris Evans) and Iron Man (Robert Downey Jnr, who doesn’t so much phone it in these days as have his PA phone it in for him) and Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson, whose PA’s PA phones it in) and Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner, who, as always, has almost nothing to do) and Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olson; deadly dull) and the weird one with the red face (Paul Bettany) who is always popping up. Plus, Paul Rudd makes an appearance as Ant-Man while Tom Holland trucks up as a wide-eyed teenage Spider-Man, complete with yet another origins story. Considering the number of origins stories Spider-Man has accrued to date, I’m amazed he can swing from his web given the weight of them. (Perhaps he sometimes asks: ‘Can I shed six of my origins stories before I go in for the swing?’)
Ouch. Somebody didn't get their cheque.
>>68870857
They're Big Mac movies. The people going to see them know what they're getting. They know these characters and their attributes. Having at least some familiarity with the characters from comics and pop culture they know their personalities and attitudes. They know how the plot will unravel. And they still go see them.
Then they come home, full of faggoty vigor, and start arguments about whether Marvel or DC (Pepsi or Coke), both starring characters and full of ideas aimed at children, is better on /tv/ as vehemently as if they had a stake in the profits.
>>68871115
>Also friendship between billionaires who lie to the legal guardians of 15 year old boys to sneak them out of the country for a few days undetected.
Are you talking about characters in the movie or Bryan Singer?
>>68871171
this
We can actually get movies that are blockbusters and good
The MCU films are pretty shit
DC and Nolan films are pretty shit
Raimi Spidy is just great and so is Watchmen
Alien 1 and 2 are goat
i mean you can have these kind of films and actually get them to be better if you dont throw a low bar at them
The Thor films are fresh right now for whatever reason but could be good if they made changes after the first one
>Deborah Ross was found dead in what appears to be a car accident.
>>68871263
I'm talking about my awesome slash fiction.
>>68870921
>>68871211
This.
What Type of stupid cunt takes on a fucking whip as a weapon to kill someone her nephew no less in a small cabin in a boat? A whip a tool to herd domestic animals on the fucking hill Steppe
>women
Of course they don't get this film they have no concept of loyalty only filling themselves up on Chad semen.
>>68871075
We're grasping and then promptly crushing the size of the realities other people think they live in
>This one review is tearing him apart
Thanks Debbie
>>68870857
Okay can someone tell me if this is really worth seeing or not?
>>68871219
bitch went full DCtard
>>68871274
This is absolutely wrong. You trash Nolan and praise Raimi even though Raimi's shit is campy as hell. Even ignoring that, blockbuster movies were never meant to have critical depth and the majority of people watching them don't want it. It is not a crime to want a movie that only has surface level depth. I agree that marketers shouldn't spin these movies as something emotionally compelling but the movies themselves should stay exactly as they are.
>>68871389
>he posted it again
>it’s business as usual when their operation to stop the theft of a biological weapon in Lagos goes explosively wrong leaving dozens of civilian casualties and themselves under scrutiny. It may be that I’m misremembering, but were there any civilian casualties in the past 896 films? Didn’t whole cities go up without anyone even wandering around dazed with a nosebleed? But the plot needs what the plot needs so now the Avengers have always blown up innocent people, which leads to 100 nations gathering together and saying: this must stop.
I think I'm in love with this woman.
>>68871423
>>68871423
you already know the answer is no
>>68871423
According to the hundreds of people I saw standing in line last night while the cinema was fucking ON FIRE, yes, it's worth seeing.
>>68871442
>campy
only faggots still use this word.
>>68870857
>Deborah Ross
Why would anyone take a female opinion seriously?
>>68871423
Honestly, no. Wait for a torrent.
Bow try writing that without crying like a bitch
>>68871389
>1.jpg
>>68871504
Don't be patronising anon, she's trying hard
>>68871502
>campy
>only faggots still use this word.
Literally means faggy.
>>68871219
>Robert Downey Jnr, who doesn’t so much phone it in these days as have his PA phone it in for him
>Scarlett Johansson, whose PA’s PA phones it in
SAVAGE
>>68871532
>>68871504
samefaggot
>>68871442
The first two spiderman weren't that campy, and being a little campy doesn't detract from Spiderman because hes a laid back character
>>68870857
CAPESHITTERS BLOWN THE FUCK OUT OF THE WATER
>>68871003
>>68871000
They don't come across as that butthurt to me. The reviewer started with a predisposition to hate the movie and then gave no reasons why she hated it. There's no reasoning given for her disdain. It's clickbaity as shit.
This is truly a let down. I was going to watch it on the theater but i'm abandoning capeshit now.
I will watch the bluray rip tho.
I can hear the suicides already.
Why is she so based? Keep em coming.
>We know they can’t die as they’ll be required for the 898th film — slated for October, as it happens — so how anyone can make any kind of emotional investment is a total mystery to me.
THIS.
The main problem with this movie is that no one dies and therefore the whole idea of them becoming enemies and working stuff out is so lame and has been done over and over.
>>68871211
I'm sorry anon, but did you see the movie?A guy in a Bucky mask blows up the UN, Cap asks Bucky if he did it, Bucky says no, then they proceed to tear the Avengers apart and start fighting. Here's the thing. FUCKING WHY? Why not track down whoever framed Bucky yourself, or have Bucky prove that he wasn't in the general vicinity of the UN at the time of the explosion? They weren't shooting to kill, he was going to be arrested. Fucking give the man a trial, prove he didn't do it, and don't try to kill your fucking friends..
>>68870857
So did she review BvS?
>mfw she praises it
>>68871196
id rather be a frog poster than a woman
>>68871786
Because you wouldn't trust someone mentally unstable.
>>68871423
Honestly, very much yes.
>>68871584
>stupid bitch
>>68871666
>The rhythm follows the same rhythm of all these films: set piece, lame joke, set piece, lame joke, bunker in Berlin, set piece, lame joke, set piece. I’m assuming the ‘moral complexity’ is intended to be in the conflicts between the characters, but these conflicts are all so obvious and cartoonish that I absolutely failed to detect it. Essentially, the script exists only to take you from one CGI action sequence to the next.
Did you actually read the article?
>Civil War
>literally nobody dies
For fuck's sake, at least kill off someone irrelevant, like Hawkeye.
>>68871423
why the fuck would you pay to see capeshit
>>68871926
It's the most civil war ever fought.
>>68871926
>>68871891
>>68870857
Fucking this.
Weeeeeeeeee piracy! Fuck paying for this Disney drivel.
![bubbles[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/P13gSGP.jpg "bubbles[1].jpg")
>>68870857
>>68870882
>>68871786
because the whole system is corrupt, are you really that naive to think Bucky could get a fair trail?
>>68870921
Apparently she has more balls than all the other nu-male critics who love bashing their toys against one another.
>read comments
>every post is "this is the worst review I've ever seen because you said something bad about my fictional hero for children"
>>68871504
>>68871289
>The accident is believed to have been caused when the bucket of nails she kept under her car overheated and exploded in the 66 degree Fahrenheit sun.
>>68870921
>strayans
http://archive.4plebs.org/sp/thread/59601089/#59601156
>>68871504
>>68871532
>butthurt marvelcucks
>>68871871
>butthurt
>The rhythm follows the same rhythm of all these films: set piece, lame joke, set piece, lame joke, bunker in Berlin, set piece, lame joke, set piece. I’m assuming the ‘moral complexity’ is intended to be in the conflicts between the characters, but these conflicts are all so obvious and cartoonish that I absolutely failed to detect it. Essentially, the script exists only to take you from one CGI action sequence to the next. Such sequences were exciting on day one of film one, but now we’re so far along that there’s more excitement and tension to be had in pairing socks. (Is this sock’s other sock here? Is it?) Also, it’s all pointless. We know they can’t die as they’ll be required for the 898th film — slated for October, as it happens — so how anyone can make any kind of emotional investment is a total mystery to me.
Based Deborah
Marvelets on suicide watch
>>68871962
>>68871938
>not paying for a non-capeshit movie and then sneaking in anyways
>>68871423
Camrip it or wait till it's on blu ray.
>Last marvel movie I payed to watch in theatres was gotg
>>68872077
>>68871926
>For fuck's sake, at least kill off someone irrelevant, like Hawkeye.
>>68871219
>‘Can I shed six of my origins stories before I go in for the swing?’
What did she mean by this?
>>68872123
a movie based on cartoons is cartoonish dudes
this bitch has GOT US
So we're all illegally watching this right?
So we're all illegally watching this right?
>>68871219
She is absolutely on the money, especially about RDJ And Johansson.
Ruthless, savege as fuck
Thank fucking God
Finally a reviewer that understands that a movie should stand on its own instead of calling back 12 previous ones and setting up 12 futures ones
A reviewer that understands how asinine the application of a cinematic universe is to a 2 hour movie.
Finally a reviewer that isnt distracted by fanboyistic love of a teenager in webbed tights because of some cartoon s/he watched as a kid.
Absolutely based
>>68872153
A star for you anon, top fucking kek!
>>68870857
>PS: please be careful what you write below the line. I’m a delicate flower and you don’t want blood on your hands.
lel
>>68870857
>>68871274
How can one post be so wrong?
Paying for bvs the sneaking into civil war
>>68870857
Even people who like this trash know it's trash.
>>68872181
RDJ was pretty good in this movie, Johansson was about the same as always.
>>68870857
Just whitelisted this site in my adblock
Will be taking all my movie reviews from there now
Finally someone who gets it
>>68872222
>>68872154
I admit that Renner growns on you, but the character is completely devoid of any charm, that said they should kill Widow before they do him in.
>>68872168
Dat damage control
>So, this is the 274784th Marvel movie this month, and all like all previous 3839499 movies it's all the same, jokes that I didn't like and action scenes that I didn't care for, I mean, they can't kill any of the 748483 characters since they need them for the next 172838 movies
>this is considered journalism now
>>68872230
lel
>>68872172
I always have my normie friends pay for my ticket, when we go to see Marvelshit.
But i don't think i'm even going to bother with this one...or Doctor Cabbagepatch.
Might go to see SS and XJUSTMen thou.
>>68872123
This is what I've always said. There is absolutely no emotional depth in these films.
>DUDE TWS HAD AMAZING KNIFE FIGHTS LMaO
>DUDE TWS HIT ME RIGHT IN THE FEELS LMAO
Not this time, Disney. I'm never paying to see a Marvelcuck film again.
>96% positive
>marvelets btfo
God damn who would have thought the desperation would get this bad.
>>68870857
This review sounds savage for the sake of it. The movie has a lot of flaws but most of her points are extremely exaggerated about how bad they are. I think it's the pressure to break through the massively positive prevailing opinions but this review is basically written to be clickbait.
>>68872309
It's spot on though. Stay butthurt.
>>68872233
hohohohoho...thats a real 'fresh' review...hahahahaha
RT is worthless.
imo DC won the war
fuck marvel and their quipshit and no risk stories
their movies are made for redditors
>all those asshurt buttmad bootyblasted culocleaved Marvelfags in the comments
>>68872365
She's actually spot on with her review. Literally every point she makes has merit.
>>68872168
>us
wow, you really identify yourself based on these films?
>>68871030
I'm sure his superiors do.
>it's 27% now
>lower than fucking My Big Fat Greek Wedding 2
>>68872371
>DC won
>28%
>not even making one billion
This level of denial is serious. Seek help
>>68872309
See >>68872233 and thats coming from an obvious shill manchild.
oh FUCK all those butthurt comments from whny idiots in the comments! fucking glorious! 10+ those cucks are easily trolled kek
>>68871289
Based Mickey
>>68872365
Actually if you read the whole things shes nice about it at the end just say its not a deep film. and shes right
>>68872324
I'm paying to watch x-men, suicide squad and doc strange
I'll just camrip Civil War
>>68872267
Just like the actor.
Why not do both of them, double murder, that may be entertaining.
marvelcucks are sad and pathetic
>>68872508
hahahahahaha
Suicide Watch incomming.
>>68870857
Am I the only who to find The Avengers 1 to be such a CGI boring shitfest?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xls3CSxW9bg
Just look how fucking stupid this looks?
How do you call this fun and entertainment?
What I see is a colorful movie made for Autistic kids.
>>68872267
Black Widow is a pretty interesting wild card character. Hawkeye is just there. He had no emotional involvement in the conflict and all he did for most of his scenes was smirk like a dumbass and escort Scarlet Witch from one place to the next.
who takes criticism better? DCucks or marvelcuks
>>68872599
I would saythey are both equally bad, and it fun to bait either side
>>68872556
Well at least it's colorful, and not just blue.
>>68870883
Disney don't be too obvious!!!
>>68870857
Finally a critic has the balls (and ironically it's a woman) to be honest about these fucking Marvel movies. I don't think any of them are outright abortions, but I'm so fucking sick of critics reviewing them on easy mode just because they're lighthearted kidshit. It's like Marvel has a fucking handicap when it comes to reviews.
>>68872599
DCucks because no matter how bad the movies get reviewed, they still bond together and ignore all the hate whereas Marvelcucks scream "blasphemy!" and cry like babies.
>>68872599
marvelcucks movie is at 96% and they're still crying and screaming
xD
>>68872678
>DC movie gets btfo
>DC fags become all instrospective and start looking within to finder hidden depth that critics missed or industry conspiracies against them
>Marvel movies gets btfo
>Marvel fags become rabit and attack the reviewer because they know the surface level is all there is and that a denial of Marvel formula means the movies will cease to exist all together
poetry
>>68872599
They're both just awful, but at least DCucks have something to whine about. It amazes how marveldrones freak the fuck out over three bad reviews. Thank god they aren't DC fans, I legitimately don't think their plaque clotted hearts could take it.
>marvel movies
>everyone talks and quips like spiderman
Jesus Christ Really?
>>68872678
Copious amounts of unified denial is nothing to be proud of.
>>68872675
She clearly touched a nerve with all those butthurt comments XD
>>68872744
>dont have Spiderman in Mcu so overcompensate by making quippers with other characters
>bring back Spiderman
>to compete wiht other quippers he's now an hyperexaggered omega-level superquipper
>>68870900
How many gifs of Chris Evans bursting into laughter are there?
>>68872540
>>68872508
Why do people have such difficulty accepting that other people don't like a movie? Why do they get so invested in this shit, for superhero movies of all things?
>>68872489
>tfw a big part of bvs pasta
>my point the whole time was there was a lot that wasn't being addressed in favor of throwing around meaningless buzzwords. i never argued to establish any front
>i liked how it took from a lot of playbooks to merge into an almost psychedelic type of free associative experience
>tfw people still shitpost and take sides, as that is what's important here
>>68872599
DCfags, most of tumblr and normalfags can't take any critism, and thats 90% of the these movies fanbase.
>>68872790
Baby boomers and beyond are all about sheltering their children. A contrary opinion is rarely encountered and it's shocking for these kiddos.
>>68872814
you wot m8?!
>>68872828
I find that hard to believe because children are more contrarian than ever, as evidenced by this board.
Holy shit. All that butthurt over her review dropping the RT score. Normies really take that shit seriously.
>>68871423
If you enjoy capeshit, this is about as good as it gets
>This article is so vague and not on point.
lel, the comments are a kekmine...
>>68872781
dozens!
>>68870857
How long until the Armond review?
>>68872881
>>68872891
>>68872891
Because they're only doing it to get attention
>>68872891
>28%
>>68872938
>Seriously, if this is ‘emotional depth’ and ‘moral complexity’ then my old cat Daphne can play the ukulele, which clearly she cannot.
And that's why women shouldn't be professional critics.
>>68872938
I can't wait familia.
>>68872979
what, because of her cat's inability to play the ukelele? step up
>>68870857
What an embarrassingly terrible review. Not the opinion but the review itself. When you clearly are going into the movie with a predisposition to hate it, you shouldn't be reviewing the movie. Simple as that. Biased nonsense
This review was done for hits and attention. The writer knows this as well.
>>68872979
This.
>not teaching your cat to play at least one musical instrument
>>68873016
Top kek!
>>68872979
You mad mcu cuck
>It features the usual suspects. Must we? List them? I suppose we must. So we have Captain America (that big chump Chris Evans) and Iron Man (Robert Downey Jnr, who doesn’t so much phone it in these days as have his PA phone it in for him) and Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson, whose PA’s PA phones it in) and Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner, who, as always, has almost nothing to do) and Scarlet Witch (Elizabeth Olson; deadly dull) and the weird one with the red face (Paul Bettany) who is always popping up. Plus, Paul Rudd makes an appearance as Ant-Man while Tom Holland trucks up as a wide-eyed teenage Spider-Man, complete with yet another origins story. Considering the number of origins stories Spider-Man has accrued to date, I’m amazed he can swing from his web given the weight of them. (Perhaps he sometimes asks: ‘Can I shed six of my origins stories before I go in for the swing?’)
That was painful, and not in the way she intended.
>>68873037
>Someone doesn't like Marvel
>they must BIAAAAASSSSS
>>68872508
Bruh...look at this dude
>>68870857
Don't like your job? Get a new one. Trashing a movie you clearly had no intention of trying to enjoy, and a franchise you couldn't even Google before going into it, is just a mean spirited thing to do.
People (writers, movie makers, actors and fans alike - not just boys with toys) are invested in these characters both in the cinematic and comic universes and they care about this film, the why of that is not your problem to try to ferret out.
Do everyone a favor and don't go see any more superhero movies. They don't deserve your bile. Good for you, you got hits because you posted this ugliness. You can't be troubled to write a decent (you don't have to like the movie or positively recommend it for a review to be decent) review, yet you call out your readers?
Of course it'd be hard for you to detect emotional depth in anything, fucking autist
>emotional depth and moral complexity
>from the same people who said The Winter Solder was provocative and compelling in theme
>>68873046
That's kind of a leap. She just said that her cat doesn't play the ukulele, not that her cat is entirely unmusical.
>>68873037
>le super butthurt marvelcuck in all its glory
This review seems like she's just sensationalizing everything. Especially in the way she's writing, like what the hell? This counts as a professional review nowadays?
>>68873112
Stay mad. Stay pasta.
>>68873112
>film reviewers must like all films!!!!!
You're too stupid to live.
>>68870857
>liked Boyhood
>liked Star Trek '09
Yeah, nah, she's a cunt.
>>68873146
>we got ANOTHER ONE BOYS! Load up the truck we got a big catch tonight
>>68873063
I hate cats and the people who talk about them.
>>68873130
>go see movie
>enjoy it
>immediately go seeking negative reviews to complain
These people are like cultists.
>>68873110
It's pretty fantastic. I mean, it is literally impossible that someone could possibly dislike this movie. It is the greatest movie ever made, and that is in no way an exaggeration.
>>68873181
kek
>don't watch marvel movies if you don't like marvel movies
and this is valuable how?
I don't begrudge anyone their opinion, but I'm a little perplexed as to why the author would ask folks to "be careful what you write below the line," as her own article is basically just trolling. She hasn't done the courtesy of offering substantive criticism, so all that comes off is a general tone of condescension towards this genre and its fans. Which is guaranteed to excite furious rebuttals.
Were I cynical, I would suspect that the whole point of the article is not to review the film, but rather to instigate controversy and thus traffic to her site.
>>68873188
>>68872952
>implying it's that good
>>68873181
>>68873234
Will the butthurt ever end?
>>68873242
Are you trying to say either of those are good movies? Try watching Boyhood right now.
>>68873146
Of course not. Only the reviews that place this generic children's movie on the same level as Citizen Kane count as professional reviews. This only counts as sensationalized clickbait.
>>68871786
>they weren't shooting to kill
Did you see the movie? They straight up say they are shooting to kill Bucky on sight.
>>68873181
>>68873250
OH MY FUCKING GOD.
Pic related is the pic that was just deleted
>EDIT
And you edited it out
She's here lads, THE REVIEWER IS IN THIS THREAD
>>68872371
How? DC is just as shitty
>>68873290
HERE WE GO
>>68873272
>being this dumb
top kek
>>68873188
>taking time to dig through her review history
Someone is ehem....mad
Wheres your laughing evans now
>>68873290
But is she in L
O
N
D
O
N
?
>>68873181
>>68873290
>edit
POINT AT THIS SLUT
POINT AT HER AND LAUGH
>>68873290
kek, you Marvel drones. I posted that cap and thought the point was diminished because I effectively posted my own response.
>>68873181
>>68873250>>68873323
Very pathetic meme attempt
>>68873360
>l-look at my wity response guys haha...
JUST
If she is here
Blessings upon her
glad one person has the gumpton to speak out against capeshit
but as its a uk paper and its like 3am here doubt she is
What's going on in this thread?
>Evansfags btfo, run out of evans
>ms paint edit to distract from savage review
a 50 year old white woman on 4chan is kind of implausible
>>68873395
exactly my point, senpai lmao
>>68872168
>US
Says it all
>>>/r/eddit
Your kind is not welcome
>>68873290
That's not the reviewer, idiot.
>>68873329
>>68873242
samefag
>>68873290
This can't be real.
>>68873403
a truckload of butthurt and a barrel of keks friend. pull up a chair and witness the carnage
>>68873290
Man, DCucks are getting desperate.
To reviewerfag you aredoing god's work.
Trigger them, trigger them until they can't get triggered anymore and then trigger them some more.
is this Marvel vs DC thing a huge marketing ploy?
it makes it so that there are no people on the bench, you are either a fan of one or the other
Personally I don't disparage between horse shit and pig shit, I just lump it all into the same boat.
>>68871423
Yeah, definitely see it in the cinema. It's cinematic.
>>68873432
>Butthurt marvelcuck who just needs to let it go
>>68873479
/v/ermin crossies need their corporate fanboy wars
>63 vs 3 reviews
How
>>68873450
>one badly written review
>DCucks pretending it's not badly written
For all I know she could be absolutely right about the movie, but holy shit the style in general is just awful. A style that bad is practically designed for attention.
>meanwhile in the real universe
finally the capeshit is over
more like CapeCrash!!
>>68873399
On the very very off chance that you are here, Deborah... Fucking thank you. Thank you for being in the very small minority of reviewers willing to be honest about this Marvel shit. Don't let the Marveldrone hivemind put you off of honesty.
Also, double dubs have been thoroughly checked, famalam
>>68873479
Samebut it is fun triggering the menchildren on both sides
>>68873508
>implying any marvel fan has any reason to be butthurt
Their movies are making a profit.
>>68873539
>t-thank you for being on my side
Sorry pham, CW is not falling off 90%
It is the capekino the world deserves.
>>68872737
Yes, it was def a Marvelfag that threatened to shoot a reviewer in the last week over her BvS review...
>>68873479
Probably no, Disney and Warner probably want that their movies and their competition do great, otherwise the failing of one would actually start to affect the other, most normies don't know that Marvel or DC are even separate universes.
Their retarded fans thou...thats another whole can of shitworms.
>>68871458
This is wrong though. Avengers shows the amount of civilian casualties at the end, even starts setting up this movie. Same with Ultron.
>>68873522
>assuming im a dcuck
>clearly butthurt
actually i have seen some worse written reviews, namely chris stuckmann's rottentomato ones.
>>68872737
Rabid, you say?
>all these overreactions over one review by a woman who doesn't like capeshit in the first place
I don't know whose worse, the DCucks who are treating this like its a new official biblical text or the angry Marvelfags who think she's making any impact at all.
>>68873582
>Avengers shows the amount of civilian casualties at the end
Where?
>>68873539
>>68873605
Isn't that the reviewer you guys tried to force into a meme for days and just gave up?
>>68872370
These fucking people man, they shit all over BVS for being unfollowable, and yet they're so busy sucking Marvel's cock they're all, "Okay, it's not original or good but it flawlessly hails to pass movies and calls to the one's to come."
Fuck RT up their fucking bum.
>>68871786
They were shooting to kill and T'Challa himself said that if he gets the chance he'll murder the shit out of Bucky.
>>68873527
>audiences liked it less than the critics did in fantasy world.
kek
>>68873605
It's just as cringeworthy in the same way. All of her jokes fall flat on their faces. Pretty ironic considering her distaste of quipverse movies. She should leave the joking to better writers and take a more straightforward approach.
>>68873638
Lmao mad DCuck.
>>68873539
>a good review is a dishonest review
What the actual fuck is going on in this thread?
>>68873614
To be fair, capeshit is garbage no matter if Marvel or DC makes it.
>>68873234
You're going to lynch her aren't you, you intolerable marvelcuck you?
>>68873564
>Their movies are making a profit.
Oh, i didnt know marvelfans get a cut of the profits marvel films ma...oh wait THEY DONT. how fucking stupid are you?
You are the one who called samefag and got your ass handed to you. when will you man children ever learn?
>>68873527
>The Force Awakens card
>>68873638
Warner Bros. owns Rotten Tomatoes.
Remember that.
>>68871219
I must've missed the Spidey origin scene, because Spidey had already been active before Tony picked him up and had had his powers for 6 months already.
>>68873639
>Nigger looking to murder
Not hard to believe
>Nigger's father was in the picture
Actually is quite hard to believe.
>>68873688
No, but we get to see DCuck tears.
BvS' disaster made DCucks go into a 1 month damage control phase, and CW will make that 3 months.
It's delicious.
>>68873688
It definitely ensures more movies.
How likely is that Aquaman flick right now?
>>68873633
Dunno i have a life outside of here.
>>68873651
>b-but shes just a useless reviewer
Dude seriously go outside once in a while and get a life. Being this buttmad over 1 small review is not making you look at better.
>>68873290
Hello R*ddit ;^)
>>68873754
No, you don't.
>>68873714
Time Warner owns a fuck tonne of servers too, Are you saying every bit of anything produced by everyone is some how their responsibility? Because they don't shill like Disney does simply makes them the better of the two.
>>68873627
News bit, theres a shot of people placing wreaths and the reporter mentions the number of casualties.
>>68873709
FINALLY, /b/LACKUP! Take these DCucks out, famalam!
>>68873688
I survive on a diet of DC tears.
>>68873666
>>68873754
>Dude seriously go outside once in a while and get a life. Being this buttmad over 1 small review is not making you look at better.
How is observing a bad writer making you come to these idiotic conclusions? I guess acknowledging John Green's awful writing is also a sign of impotent rage?
>>68873681
A tidalwave of butthurt, thats what!
>>68873684
True, but marvelcucks are proving to be just as bad as dcucks at taking negative reviews.
>>68873651remember that really old movie, the empire strikes back?You have a metal arm? DUDE, THAT'S AWESOME!Does anyone have any orange slices?
>>68873856
>!
Greetings, Reddit.
>mfw imagining some drooling braindead quipeating Marvelfag mashing the F5 button on the RT page for a new negative reviewer to harass
Pathetic tbqh
>>68873856
Good thing they only have to take a couple.
>>68873856
We are still far away from threatening to kill others.
>>68873612
>>68872346
Knife fights have nothing to do with emotional depth, though.
