Are these good movies? Y/N
No.
>>68855631
Better looking than LOTR, that's for sure
>>68855631
LOTR 1 > Hobbit 1 > rest of LOTR > rest of Hobbit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjxKW3wWGk4
>>68855631
Judge for yourself.
>>68855631
No. The documentaries are however extremely interesting and give a good idea of how fucked Jackson knew they were and how much improvisation and last minute changes happened to get the thing vaguely back on tracks. It is never stated hoppenly, of course, but you feel it.
>>68855631
It's a bunch of fan-fic bs.
>>68855901
Even worse than I remember it looking in the theatre...
>>68855631
Not really
Better off rewatching Lotr again
>>68855901
>>68855837
>Better looking than LOTR, that's for sure
>>68855901
sure thing
LOL
>>68855901
They're magical bricks, what's hard to understand?
I still enjoyed 1 and 2
3 was a big pile of shit
>>68856365
Nothing, makes perfect sense.
Reminder
Lotr: Reddit
The hobbit: 4chan
The Lord of the Rings films are good. Not great, but good.
The Hobbit films are not good.
Judge for yourself.
>>68856493
>not great
*tips*
>>68856493
Opinion discarded.
You tell me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag1o3koTLWM
>>68856408
i loved that part in the lotr:tt ps2 game
>>68856554
>>68856563
Not him, but while FotR is a solid great film, the sequels are only good. As a whole, it is impossible to call the trilogy "great".
>>68856951
Here is your >(you)
Being contrarian is soooo last decade.
>>68855631
No and the romance subplot between the dwarf and the elf is really noticeably forced and hamfisted.
>>68855631
Auj
>Y
Dos
>Y
Bofa
>N
Who would have made it better though?
Del Toro, or Jackson with prep time?
>>68855631
Watch up to Bilbo fighting the spiders then watch the end credits song by Billy Boyd. Everything else is not worth worth your time.
