What's the best runtime for a film and why is it 90 minutes ?
>>68844847
72 minutes.
Action movie : 90 minutes
Movie that has a plot and isn't some kind of nostalgia cashgrab : 120 minutes or more
3hrs+
>>68844847
as long as quality of the movie stays good.
>>68844847
It's 240 minutes.
I watched an Indonesian puppet show, and it last from 8PM to 4PM.
>>68845039
I meant 4AM.
Depends on the movie
And I think the convention that a movie needs to be at least 80 minutes harms some films, especially comedies.
Likewise for epics being cut down to 2.5 hours so the studio can have more showings.
120 minutes
>>68844847
3 hours
90 to 120
>>68844847
Depends on the story. If it's just a popcorn flick then 90 minutes. If it's a film it can be either 90 minutes or 120 minutes.
>>68844847
90 minutes sucks ass. if the movie's good i'm disappointed because it was too short. sure, if the movie's bad a short run time is good but i'd rather watch a long good movie than a short bad one.
>>68845948
also, the best run time is anywhere between 135 and 150.
>>68844847
>when i'm forced to watch a movie with my wife
as short as possible, definitely <90min
>when it's a genuinely good movie
don't care. but longer than 3 hours is too much for one sitting.
>>68844847
Is anyone else having more and more trouble just giving a fuck about a movie's characters and story with all the great tv these days? It's just too small of a timeframe for me to actually care about them and feel genuine compassion for the characters or feel like i'm being immersed into their world. It rarely cuts for me anymore unless it's a film that truly requires the audience to be imaginative and fill in the blanks were necessary rather than spoonfeeding them with dumb exposition and hamfisted storylines throughout the film. It might sound like a joke but action movies like Dredd, John Wick and Fury Road does these things perfectly. Or films like Stalker, The Cure or 2001. Otherwise i just can't be bothered with them these days.
i like hitchcock's quote about a film lnegths should be beased on the draubility of human blddder
Anywhere short of 3 hours is good. after 3 hours it starts to get tough but I can endure it if the film is good, I'll also take a short break in the middle.
>>68846376
damn, you're very fucking drunk, anon
>>68846355
Other way around for me, I just don't give a duck about tv anymore
Actually I never really did
>>68845994
>forced to watch a movie with my wife
would you fuck her off if she got vag cancer and you couldn't cum in her any more?
>>68846385
pleb
>>68846452
They take breaks in the theatre hombre I'm just emulating the authentic experience
>>68846426
Anal
>>68846495
the vag cancer causes her to lose bowel control when you put your dick in there though
>>68844847
It's 90 mins, I don't really like the recent trend where people make films around 2 and a half hours long desu
>>68846376
I read that without hesitation.
Looked back at it and kek'd.
whenever a movie feels too long I just play it in 2x or 4x speed desu
>>68846562
they can do it in the shower
the shit won't come out until he does after all
>>68846010
Babyfigs don't even know!
>>68844847
>feature
110min
>movie
100min
>joint
95-120min
>flick
90min
>film
100min
>cinéma
85-130min
>kino
115-150min
>cinématographe
25-300min
>>68847084
So a joint falls into the cinematography category, nice one, retard
>>68847109
No, silly. Each category has an ideal runtime. Some are suited for longer or shorter run-times. Joints have a larger suitable range, but that doesn't make them patrician.
>>68847165
Oh I see you now, sorry, I'm the retard
