Which one is the best, and what should be the dominant format?
>>68628386
1:1
>>68628386
Cinema 2.39:1
16:9
Vertical iPhone aspect
Depends on how the movie is being shot
we need to go wider
There's more.
Also, Jurassic World was 2.00:1
Seems like a nice middle ground
>>68628607
>4.00:1
shieeeeeeeeet nigga
>>68628607
Why the hell did 16:9 ever become a thing? It's a literal downgrade from 1.85:1, which should have been the TV widescreen standard, not this weird 1.78 crap
Just shoot everything in IMAX
everything will be filmed for VR soon ;^)
360:1 will be standard ;^)))))))))))))))))))))))
>>68628919
true
>>68628852
This.
IMAX should be the dominant format.
>>68628852
I should have specified - IMAX film. For some reason the digital is 1.9:1 but film is 1.43:1. I like the way 1.43 fills your field of view in all directions when you're close enough.
>>68628743
They split the difference between the American and European standard widescreen formats. Blame France.
>>68628649
It's three 1:1s on separate screens.
That Napoleon movie was cray.
>>68629588
based
>>68629523
So France was unwilling to do 1.85?
>>68628386
Whatever fits my tv
>>68629588
early Hollywood megalomania was so great
>>68628743
>it's a literal downgrade from 1.85:1
no it's an upgrade from 4:3
>>68629902
Probably. Seems like something they would do.
>>68629666
SATAN aproves
>>68629588
>4:1
>It's three 1:1s
