![1077_front[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/11m3pX9.jpg "1077_front[1].jpg")
Is it worth taking 3½ to watch this film? I don't really care about historical accuracy, since it is (after all) a Hollywood film...
>>68209844
No, no 3½ year old will understand this film.
>>68209844
back and to the left
back and to the left
back and to the left
>>68209844
LHO did it
saved you 3.5 hours
>>68209844
>all that bullshit bout hidden files to be opened 20 years down the line
Oliver Stone tricked me.
>>68210039
that's a strange way to spell CIA
History teacher here who watches it every year with my final year history students (grade 12 in america?). Stone took some liberties with it of course, but it's a pretty damn good film.
Allen Dulles was totally behind it desu.
>>68210781
LMHS?
>>68210797
No, the acronym means nothing to me.
It's a good watch. Lots a great cameos, too, if that sort of thing doesn't ruin the immersion for you.
>>68210781
dumb ghettoposter
>>68209844
Yes
The editing is God-tier
