You've gotta be shitting me.
Breaking News: Disney owns the review industry.
DC on suicide watch.
DAWN OF APEKINO
>>68199746
So why did tomorrowland get shitty reviews
DISNEY DOESN'T BUY REVIEWS GUYS
HONEST
IT'S JUST LITERALLY THE GREATEST MOVIE EVER, WHO'D HAVE THOUGHT
>Recent movie
>Only 40 fresh reviews and no rotten yet
It's obvious, also, no audience score.
kids movies have a bias
disney movies have a bias
nostalgic movies have a bias
its probably really good too
>>68199769
Or John Carter, or Thor 2, or age of Ultron, or alone Ranger
>>68199720
>>68199746
>delusional internet 12 year olds actually believe this is possible
>>68199769
>implying they didn't pay for the favorable reviews
That movie got more credit than it deserved. 50% favorable reviews is a joke.
Disney is known for fucking over reviewers hard if they give bad reviews for good movies. Disneyshit will always get 90+ unless it's truly awful.
>Average review: 7.7
Get your eyes checked ding bats.
>>68199878
ABC Disney literally signs a lot of these reviewers paychecks. They work for them directly you shithead.
Disney's monopoly on the blockbuster film market is depressing
It's the same safe, all inclusive, unchallenging movie again and again. And they all make ridiculous money.
I don't like any Disney movies because I haven't been a child in a while, but anyone who denies they put out almost exclusively top quality stuff for the demographics they're appealing to is an idiot. Then again I realize I'm on a board full of people who go out and see the latest animated shit for kids and think it's completely normal, then come here and discuss it on a site that's supposed to be 18+.
>>68199880
Tomorrowland was great, shut your fucking face nigger.
>7.7/10
It means 100% liked it, retard.
>>68199949
Great post. /tv/ is just too autistic to get it.
>>68199989
t. Hispanic pedophile
Come on people. Jon Favreau deserves more credit than this. Maybe it's a good fucking movie?
>>68199756
Indeed.
>>68199918
I can tell that you're smart because you used the word "literally" as if that's proof.
>>68199769
>>68199843
>>68199989
>Gave bvs 28% and yet, Thor 2, Tomorrowland, John Carter of Mars are all given more positive reviews.
Try again, you friggen shills.
>>68199989
BVS was brilliant, you disney shill shit.
What will happen to DCucks if it actually ends at 100% when they give the certified fresh?
Disney is ruining movies. Enough of this shit already.
>>68200963
I dunno, they're pretty resilient.
>>68199720
>DKEK
>>68200963
THEY BE ON SOME KINDA SUE SIDE WATCH
>>68199720
when will this meme end? it just means that they pressed the 'like' button over the dislike 40/40 times. the actual score is 7.7
KINO
KINO
KINOa
>>68200427
pls be bait
>>68201281
Anytime you people come across the truth, it's bait.
>>68199769
Because they occasionally drop a really bad bomb that gets bad reviews (with a greenlight from Disney) every once in awhile so some fuck on 4chan can say "why did x get bad reviews?" You're essentially an unpaid shill. That's how good they are.
I've seen Jungle Book unfortunately. It was average at best. Anyone who actually uses RT as a way of judging movies is a fucking retard.
>>68201481
>the truth
>bvs brilliant
again, pls be bait
>>68199720
All fresh reviews are worthwhile
>>68201512
did you like it or dislike it
what do you rate it out of 10
DC IN FULL DESTRUCTION MODE.
WB IN SUICIDE SQUAD.
>>68201531
Go watch antman or the force awakens or whatever it is disney throws at you.
>>68201617
sure thing bud, seeing how those two are much more brilliant than the trash that is BvS
sorry that DC is a failure, time to switch sides
DISNEY CANNOT BE STOPPED
>>68201682
As you were shill, nothing to see here.
>CGI
When will this fucking meme die
>not being on the Disney juggernaut
OUT OF THE WAY LOSERS
Ugh the worst thing about Disney devouring culture is occasionally they are decent enough at it that I want to check it out.
John Favreau trying to create an immerssive vfx world with the Jungle Book setting and characters sounds really appealing to me and I'll probably check it out. I'm not expecting anything GREAT, because critics are fucking trash now with how uniformly they embrace "ok fine" movies.
>>68201890
>im not expecting anything good because critics say its good and critics are dumb, unlike myself
Just shut the fuck up and go see something you have an interest in and make up your own mind. Fucking faggot.
>>68199720
>improves upon its predecessors
no fucking way
>>68199720
What?
RT always writes an early consensus for handpicked early reviews before opening day. ALWAYS. They also usually change it after a few days when the negative reviews start pouring in.
>>68200140
I liked Iron Man and Chef, and I think the studio ruined IM2.
>>68201557
This is fake, right?
>>68201938
teeth on my taint its unrealistic to think you can go into every fucking movie w/o expectations, i'm just expressing the results of a thought process that informs whether i go see something to begin with.
>>68199796
This. Watch it drop real soon.
Also, keep in mind that reviewers are told to review this with the target audience in mind. Marvel movies are reviewed with a younger audience being considered as well as adult audiences, and the recent DC movies are told to keep in mind teens and older.
>>68201512
It's a 7.7 and will probably go lower soon. So you're right
>>68199720
Watched it on sunday, it's pretty fucking good mate.
>>68201512
Prove it.
What was the joke that people laughed at when mowgli first dropped the torch??
It was a pretty blatant and easy to remember pun
>>68200427
>snidershit
>brilliant
pick one
>>68199907
>Average Rating: 7.7/10
This is the "It was alright." Disney formula that they've really settled into. A lot of Disney movies end up being really fresh because it's mediocre enough to not be terrible and but it's almost never amazing. They make movies to be as accessible and inoffensive to most people as possible. Disney is the McDonalds of the movie industry.
>>68199720
This movie might be good...
But I've stopped trusting RT when it comes to Disney-produced films after they gave Star Wars: TFA a 92% and an average rating of like 8.3/10.
>>68202480
>Disney is the McDonalds of the movie industry
100% correct -- could not have said it better myself.
I wouldn't mind so much if it didn't result in their movies didn't always have a constant circle-jerk on the web.
Also it results in their animated movies winning Oscars they don't deserve.Though I did really like Zootopia
>>68202538
>Also it results in their animated movies winning Oscars they don't deserve.
Nobody in the Academy cares about the Best Animated Film award. They largely just choose the biggest and most successful animated movie for the year and call it a day.
>>68202043
No
https://twitter.com/simonmiraudo/status/718958693606236160
he got shit on though
>>68202494
tfa was worth a 92
and i dont even like star wars films
>>68202425
>>68202425
>>68202425
>>68202425
>>68202425
>>68202425
he cant even respond because he never saw it
>>68202604
That's why I think they should either find some way to change the voting procedure of that category or just dump it altogether and push for them to nominate animated films in more serious categories.
Otherwise it becomes literally 'give Disney a free Oscar'.
I can at least hope that if a Disney film has to win this year, it is Zootopia instead of the Pixar sequel or the princess musical being released during Oscar season.
>>68202617
No way was it worth a fucking 92%. It was a generic cluster-fuck with completely forgettable characters, rehashed story elements, generic direction and cinematography, painfully obvious fan-service, and -- perhaps most egregious of all -- a highly forgettable John Williams score.
>>68201563
Yeah I guess I liked it. Probably 6/10. My gf loved it though cuz she's into that nostalgic Disney shit.
>>68202425
I saw it because I live in Brisbane, Australia and it came out last week for us.
I can't remember the pun you're talking about but I can tell you he got the torch from the human camp and ran back to the peaceful watering hole. There was a little spark that fell from the torch which set the forest on fire and he didn't realise it until all the animals were scared of him for having the red flower
>>68200427
>>68201617
Why does disliking BvS immediately make me a Marvel drone?
You're all retards in my book.
>>68202757
edgy my dude
>>68202691
For a while it was "Give Pixar a free Oscar". Wreck-it Ralph was much, much better than Brave.
>>68199899
proove it
>>68199720
JungleKino like it was foretold
>>68199720
>>68199769
>>68199843
False flags
Also AOU and Thor 2 got massively inflated RT scores
>>68201557
Can you even make a review WITHOUT mentioning Trump? At all? Your hate is just making him stronger.
>>68203851
Gee, I wonder who controls every aspect of the media.
>>68199769
delete this
>>68199769
Was too obvious with the pro-cunny agenda
IT'$S JUST THE BE$T MOVIE EVER MAN DI$NEY NEVER FAIL$
>>68199720
Just saw it on sunday.
Movie was fucking great ,the 3d was amazing , i like Bare necessities a lot. Cast was great. Is basically the animated movie but more mature.
ITT poltards and /x/ angry that God not Dead 2 Boogaloo didn't get a fresh rating. A blooo blooo sjw jooos did it.
