Was anyone really expecting it to be good in the first place?
>make sequel for a film that wasn't that good or that popular on it's own
>>68186642
Read the reviews, they're all political drivel, movie critics are a joke
it's an unnecessary sequel to an unnecessary grimdark edgy reboot of a fairy tale
no one asked for the first and no one asked for this one
Critics downmark every movie that isn't capeshit for more marketing
>>68186666I was for Queen/Elsa-fu kinoma.
>>68186642
It's directed by some random dude, written by the guy who wrote the Hangover sequels, and nothing else going for it besides the visual appeal (which is just the same style from the first movie applied again)
>>68186762
Clearly you haven't been awake these past few weeks.
It's something for the "DOA: Dead or Alive" DVD section on your shelf.
>>68186642
They actually released it in theaters. How they thought it was a good idea I have no clue. Same with Gods of Egypt, they know these movies look terrible right? Right?
>>68186642
its a shitty re-purposing of fairly tale characters for yet another fantasy film based around large CGI battle set pieces.
Every mainstream fantasy film wants to turn their property into lord of the rings even if it doesn't remotely fit. You can't expect these films to be anything but trash.
NO KSTEW
MISS ME YET /TV/?
>>68188396
Fuck no
They don't understand the mommycore universe.
>>68188555
Probably 'too white' for the critics.
>Literally no one is asking for a Snow White cinematic universe
>Make one anyway because???
we're not your bros fuck off
>>68188396
TSUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
When this shit releasing anyway i will see it cause emilyfu and feministfu
>>68186642
>>68186699
>>68186723
>>68187112
>>68188625
Didn't some dude write or direct this after winning a screenwriting contest?
>>68186642
>movie about a snow white villain
>NOT made by Disney
>critics must obey
JUST
>>68186642
how are the sex scenes
>>68186642
It was a sequel nobody asked for a film nobody really liked that much to begin with, but now with ice magic to cash in on the popularity of frozen
I'm surprised there was an actual studio who thought it would be smart to produce a sequel to a movie that didn't do well.
>budget 170 mill
>makes 396 mill globally
How does this shit happen?
who asked for this though?
Fucking Disney paying critics off again because they're butthurt about Frozen being co-opted by another studio.
has anyone here actually watched it?
>>68191110
nah
>>68188984
mfw I enjoyed it more than any of the hobbit movies, OK fantasy flick
Didn't except the reviews to be this bad for the sequel/whatever it is
wondering if hot people will bring the box office in
i was honestly considering watching it but I just don't have ay free time for cinema lately
>>68186666
All those unchecked 6s
Why do we use RT and not IMDB?
>>68190964
it's called marketing
>>68186642
that nigger girl from feminist road.
>>68187229
I like that movie in real life. DoA
>>68186642
They got Blunt and Chastain's casting mixed up.
Poor Hemsworth will never have a successful movie without marvel
>>68193064
Rush
>>68186666
I was expecting it to be on par with snow white at leaast
>>68191110
I did, and it was a fun little movie, not much thinking involved, I got to check out the females while my girlfriend oogled thor... If you aren't 'looking' for something bad about it, then you'll probably enjoy it for what it is
>>68189256
Better explanation than "because someone wanted it"
>>68190767
what's JUST about him? He looks MIGHTY.
>>68186699
The first one did very well actually. But Universal failed to realize the reason people watched it:
SNOW WHITE
>>68196311
JUST hijack my premiere up
>they didn't even walk the red carpet
I feel sorry for Craig Mazin at this point.
>>68197928
He's not doing a'mazin these days I know
>>68194968
Rush couldn't even make it's paltry $38mil budget back domestically even with Ron Howard as the director. Hemsworth leading is cancer unless he's in a Thor movie where Hiddleston can carry him or in an Avengers movie where he can be pushed to the background.
>>68199279
That's too bad because Rush was good, and so was his performance.
>>68186666
Satanic quad
>>68186666
>>68186699
>>68187399
>>68187877
>>68188555
>>68189077
>>68196311
can I apply for the dubs club
>>68199279
It really shouldn't be surprising Howard made yet another bad movie. More than half the titles tied to his name are godawful.
>emily blunt will NEVER step on your balls
just die in my sleep already
( ._.) ( ;_;)
>And then Anon asked me to step on his balls!
>>68199864
>I did it! And then ruined his orgasm!
>>68199864
>Nooo way. That CAN'T be true. Surely he can't be THAT pathetic, right? You know, Emily, if you don't mind – can I borrow him for a night? I wanna play with him – JUST a little bit
>>68200022
>sweetingman.exe
>>68200081
( ._.)
>>68200238
>( ._.)
please leave and don't come back
>>68188396
y-yeah...
>>68195501
They are.
SWaTH sucked, too.
>>68200599
Why did you respond to this?
>Did anyone expect it to be good?
>I expected it to be similar to the first
>REEEE IT WAS REEE THEY BOTH SUCK REE I'M SILLY REEEEEEEE
seriously dude fuck off
Literally Muh dick: the film
>>68199279
A shame when he's a lead in anything that's not Thor he's box office poison, because he's actually a decent actor and Best Hemsworth.
>>68200081
Y-you too, senpai
>>68186642
No BBC for the female lead
