Now that the dust has settled, what is /tv/'s opinion of Le Voyage dans la Lune?
>>68174893
hollywood remake when?
>>68174893
Still surprisingly entertaining and evocative. While endearingly primitive, it's also timeless in many ways.
I took an art orientation class for gen ed credits and we watched this when we talked about film.
Some girl asked if this was what people back then actually thought the moon was like.
I preferred the smashing pumpkins remake
Not enough diversity
>Dude. Dude. What if... Dude listen, what if we sent Wes Anderson back to 1902?
What noise is he making?
>>68175052
This
I give it 0 out of a billion
>>68174893
I really like the part where there's a fistfight in the French Senate.
it would have been cool if they'd launched the ship and, when it arrived on the moon, we saw that the crew had been pulped by the acceleration of the launch. red puddle of muck with bones and organs.
i mean, light grey puddle of muck.
>>68174990
I kekked
Too soon to say
caters to the reddit audience
>Did somebody say "soft reboot"?
>>68174893
>sp/fx driven spaceshit
Moving pictures were a mistake.
>>68178901
Yeah, this is pure pleb tourist garbage
plot holes
i know this is sci-fi, but come on. breathing on the moon without a suit?
>>68174893
>now that the dust has settled?
Are you fucking kidding me?
Do you know how old this flick (correct category) is?
Honestly, sometimes 4chan completely baffles me
You newfaggots need to lurk moar
Us anons have chatted about this so much
>>68174893
Ordinary in terms of entertainment but very important as it shows what stage performance and its audience were like at that time.
It seems they are all smiling and the audience also expected them to smile. It was a totally different attitude in theater from today
>people back then were satisfied seeing girls like these
>>68179244
(You)>GOTCHA, I'm only pretending to be le retarded
Would be cool if they did a new movie about turn of the century France launching a rocket to the moon. I guess it would be "steam punk"
>>68177084
Ha ha the moon should of caught the ship and said "I'm a spider not a dog!"
>>68174950
Edison did remake it as A Trip to Mars that year
>>68179621
I think they already did it in 60s
>>68179394
MY DICK
>>68174893
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOG3eus4ZSo
>>68174893
It's pretentious, the editing is terrible, it has plenty of scientific inaccuracies and the special effects were poorly executed.
4/10
>>68175201
What the fuck is the purpose of this scene?...
>>68179877
True. Doesn't even come close to the greatest film of all time:Interstellar
>>68179899
Slapstick humor
>>68174893
it's great
>all these negative opinions
Maybe you should have gone to see it in the theatre instead of looking at the flip-book by candlelight in your parents wine cellars. Holy shit I hate all you plebs.
>>68174974
It goes to show that good filmmaking is immortal.
Why did Futurama have so many silent film references?
>>68180040
Found the assburgers
>>68180040
>Spending the hard earned shilling you made in the factory on a flick
>Not picking up a bootleg film reel from the Bay of Pirates.
>>68174893
Georges Méliès was a genious. he created cinemae from that dull shots.
>>68179853
Your dick what?...they are so average
>>68180168
He's right though, comparing the big screen with your tv is just stupid.
>>68174893
I like the colored version they have on netflix. The music goes really well with it.
>>68180286
He was making a joke
UHD disc when? I'd like to see it in 3D too.
how accurate was Hugo?
The guy couldn't have gotten shit on that much
>>68179899
Whats the purpose of any scene in this? Its fantastical and funny. There's a real man in the moon
