So another studio thinks it's a good idea to shit out another Jungle Book movie so soon after the one this year.
Rohan Chand as Mowgli
Matthew Rhys as John Lockwood
Freida Pinto
Andy Serkis as Baloo
Christian Bale as Bagheera
Benedict Cumberbatch as Shere Khan
Cate Blanchett as Kaa
Peter Mullan as Akela
Naomie Harris as Nisha
Eddie Marsan as Vihaan
Jack Reynor as Brother Wolf
Tom Hollander as Tabaqui
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jungle_Book_(2018_film)
>>68174416
>Both turn Kaa into a woman to avoid any possible gay subtext
Are Americans really this easily triggered?
>>68174416
>another studio
>look it up and it's warner bros
so is their plan to get their money back from BvS to release a movie that's already out and made by an infinitely more successful company?
because this sounds like a terrible plan
why does /tv/ suddenly pretend they care about what studio does what? none of you probably even read Kipling's stories much less watch the 1942 film
>>68174554
I think it's more related to the fact we have a Jungle Book movie and then another one in two years done by a different studio purely because they wanna do it. It's not even like a story continuation or anything.
>>68174416
>>68174589
it's because the copyright has expired
>>68174478
It's like WB is trying to fail
protip: stop competing with Disney
>>68174616
Yeah look no one is looking at this from a legal stand point more so how retarded it is to release the same premise twice in two years
this second movie can't possibly do as well and surely they know it
>>68174554
Because /tv/ doesnt have ideas or thoughts of their own anymore, all their comments come from not seeing movies and repeating youtuber comments (who are all paid shills since they all literally repeat the same lines) its almost as bad as people who watch 24 hour news channels.
>>68174667
no but that's the reason why they're doing it. because it's a free pre-established world and story and "brand name".
It's going to be "darker" and done with mo-cap too.
>>68174416
Was the one from this year any good? Haven't heard a thing about it.
>>68174731
It's based on the original books, while Favreau one is based on a cartoon. IIRC books actually are pretty fucked up
>>68174744
apprently it's surprisingly alright
>>68174416
>Principal photography began on 9 March 2015. Warner Bros. will release the film in North America on 19 October 2018.
Three and a half years between starting filming and release? Wtf?
>>68174416
>WAAAH WHY DO THEY HAVE TO MAKE ANOTHER MOVIE ABOUTS STEVE JOBS THE FIRST ONE WITH ASHTON KUTCHER WAS ALREADY A SUCCESS?
>>68174791
but the Fassbender one bombed too
>WTF THIS A RIPOFF OF ANTZ WHY ARE PIXAR SUCH A BUNCH OF HACKS
>>68174791
But the first one isn't even out yet you stupid mong. And the second steve jobs movie was also a retarded idea so wtf is your point?
>WAAAH WHY IS DISNEY STEALING THE IDEAS OF DREAMWORKS
>>68174454
>Why don't American children's movies have more subtext about faggots ass-fucking?
Europe.
>>68174416
Disney is already planning on a sequel too.
>>68174791
>>68174829
>>68174856
>if it happens more than once than it becomes good
Oh yeah I forgot haha thanks :)
>>68174856
Literally no one remembers this movie.
