>MALE screen-actors have been complaining recently of their increased objectification by female fans. Henry Cavill, the current big-screen incarnation of Superman, stated that it represents a “double standard”. Kit Harington, a lead actor on the television series “Game of Thrones”, protested: “to always be put on a pedestal as a hunk is slightly demeaning. It really is, and it’s in the same way as it is for women.”
>They may have a point. Data collected by USC Annenberg (University of Southern California) demonstrate that the “hyper-sexualisation” of men in films has increased substantially in less than a decade. Of the 100 top-grossing films at the US box-office in 2007, 4.6% of male characters were seen dressed in “sexualised attire” and 6.6% were shown “with some nudity”. In 2014 those figures stood at 8.0% and 9.1%. 2013 marked the highest point of this trend (the year that “Man of Steel”, featuring Mr Cavill, was released), with 9.7% of male characters shot in sexually alluring clothing, and 11.7% taking some—or all—of their kit off on film.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/04/daily-chart-6?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/sexualisationinfilms
Does this mean actresses will stop playing the victim card?
>>68172014
imagine this scene with women
>>68172014
I think about these legs every day in jealously
>>68172014
those are the sexiest and beefiest legs I have seen in a while
>>68172014
isn't the point just that movies are becoming too sexualised? also americans confuse nudity and sex, look at european movies
>>68172014
Sexualization of men is much less harmful than that of women. When men are sexualized they are never infantilized or utterly objectified. Because men still retain the power sexually
"Oh you see that guy? He's just a piece of ass"
"He only got that role because of his pecs"
"Who did he sleep with to get the lead?"
You will never see people say things like that about Henry Cavill. Nor will people try to grab his butt on set etc. etc.
>>68172247
>look at european movies
No thanks those are for cucks
>>68172159
Bukkake? I don't need to imagine.
>>68172014
>Henry Cavill, the current big-screen incarnation of Superman, stated that it represents a “double standard”. Kit Harington, a lead actor on the television series “Game of Thrones”, protested: “to always be put on a pedestal as a hunk is slightly demeaning. It really is, and it’s in the same way as it is for women.”
>waah people think I'm attractive
Why are British actors such niggers?
>>68172014
I don't think show guys in a sexualized way is an issue, it's that women are being held to a lower standard that "they are all gorgeous" while only the absolute fittest guys are considered too looking.
Personally I'd prefer if both men and women were held to a high standard. Why the fuck do I want to see average chick pretend to be beautiful in a fucking make believe movie?
>>68172317
We need more topless male extras
>>68172317
Who constitutes what is and isn't sexualized clothing, though?
>>68172014
>only the white male actors complaining
what a surprise.........
not
Just look at the last Star Trek film, they made a while fuss about Alice Eve in here underwear because the scene served no purpose, yet the Chris Pine topless scene was never mentioned and that was in the film for the same reason.
>>68172317
What is "sexualized attire"
Are tights sexualized? That's like 98% of capeshit movies.
>Oh boo hoo I'm so good-looking and attractive. Why is life is so hard?
Fuck outta here.
Talk about fucking first world problems.
>>68172267
>Sexualization of men is much less harmful than that of women.
that's sexist as fuck.
fuck you
>>68172014
nice legs tbqh
>>68172014
>Henry Cavill, the current big-screen incarnation of Superman, stated that it represents a “double standard"
No it doesn't, you stupid fuck. Stop farting out words you read on the internet if you aren't going to use them right.
>>68172267
>"Oh you see that guy? He's just a piece of ass"
Several male actors have made a career out of this.
>>68172481
how? there are no gay producers in hollywood!
>>68172014
yeah yeah. It's been happening for decades with women so women only want literal 10/10 even if you're a fucking neckbeard virgin neet. And now they are doing it with men so women only want literal 10/10. Why I don't know. Maybe they don't want us being together and having more kids, maybe they want us to be angry at the other sex more often.
Also it sells.
>>68172267
Stupidest thing Ive ever read.
>>68172417
Shatner was shirtless all the time as kirk.
>>68172379
>>68172434
>>68172531
Anything less than Full Plate armor.
>>68172531
feminism these days tries to hide women's sexuality, seems like a moral cult in disguise
>>68172014
no. women will continue to proclaim inequality even if they are equal or above men. its natural for them.
>inb4 haha /pol/ fag
>>68172498
matthew mcounaghey had to suck dick to get into hollywood. its not even a secret
>>68172014
Is not sexism if it is done to men
Is not racist if it is done to whites
>>68172498
>there are no gay producers in hollywood
Not sure if being sarcastic.
>>68172498
Uh, Joel Schumacher would like to have a faaaabaaalouussss word with you.
Are we going to discuss Chris Pratts body of work here or not?
I wonder what he takes to look this great
>>68172581
was pretty sure that it was obvious.
Hollywood is full of faggots, and most of the guys that can get a chance to make their first big movie need to suck cock.
fo you think Brad pitt never bite the pillow?
>>68172591
>his wife prefers him fat
>but he makes kerbillions like this
It would be a hard choice.
>>68172591
>>68172014
I want to choke on his chode so bad..
>>68172549
>feminism these days tries to hide women's sexuality
Really? The opposite seems true to me. They're trying to take the socially unacceptable and make it acceptable. They've promoted general hedonism for a long time and dressed it up as empowerment.
>>68172626
That kid is trying hard not to check out his dick
Instead of toning down the "sexualisation" of male and female actors why don't they go full sexualisation of both gender ? C'mon men and women want some good fap material. We're all humans we know what a dick, a pussy, an ass, a pair of tits and pecs look like.
>>68172695
Because sex is shameful and you need Jesus in your life.
>>68172695
I dislike sex scenes and over-sexualisation in film. It's almost always unnecessary and only there to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
![henry-cavill-trolling-happens[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GlTwBZt.jpg "henry-cavill-trolling-happens[1].jpg")
>>68172014
Oh Henry, you're at it again, aren't you?
>>68172738
Why does sexuality make people like you feel icky?
>>68172791
It doesn't. I just don't watch movies for sex scenes, like a 12 year old.
>>68172822
When you turn 13, you will.
>>68172245
Are legs on a man that sexy? I've had a girl tell a friend my legs drove her crazy (she had never even seen them out of jean) and I was fairly confused, I've never heard of a girl getting turned on by legs alone.
>>68172852
I'm a straight guy and I find them very aesthetic in a greek 'perfect man' sort of way
Grills are weird, man, who knows what they think
>>68172822
The implication is that they bother you.
Otherwise you wouldn't even mention them.
>>68172791
Not him, not even American, but he's right, I watch porn to see ass and tits, I watch movies to appreciate the art form. Imagine if you went a classical art gallery and every painting had had pages from playboy stapled over them, and when you asked why you get told
>WELL EVERYONE HAS THEM WHY ARE YOU SO UNCOMFORTABLE WITH YOUR SEXUALITY?
>>68172940
If it was good art then I wouldn't care, quite frankly.
You act like human sexuality sits in some isolated bubble and isn't part of every facet of our lives. Trying to bury this fact, or even being ashamed, seems like you're uncomfortable with the true nature of humanity.
>>68172937
Yeah, blatant pandering with sex scenes or ultra sexualisation does annoy me. Why wouldn't it?
I know it's in there to keep plebs from pulling out their phones.
>>68172940
classical art is lewd as fuck already though
>>68172983
>sexuality shouldnt be in the bedroom
>sexuality should be flaunted like some base animal
humans are supposed to be above animalistic tendencies. not equal to them
>>68172983
No way. Look at Game of Thrones it's like a Transformers movie if violence and explosions were tits.
>>68172267
>"Oh you see that guy? He's just a piece of ass"
>"He only got that role because of his pecs"
>"Who did he sleep with to get the lead?"
Literally Channing Tatum: the career
>>68172317
>top 700 films
People obviously don't want women driven movies then
>box office split is literally 50-50 men to women
Yeah, women a shit
>>68172852
legs, forearms, hair..
They're on the list.
>>68172983
Good art that you can't see because the sexuality that serves no thematic purpose has been shoved in front of it, that was my point. The point you seem to be driving doesn't line up with my arguments at all. To say that sexuality is influential in every facet of our lives is if anything an understatement (if for no other reason than it being a point that cannot be stated enough), but that doesn't mean it belongs in every facet of our lives, especially in the outside world.
Another example would be you're at a child's birthday party and begin masturbating, then when one of the dads punches you in the gut and slams your head into a wall you start crying
>WHAT THE FUCK MAN, EVERYONE MASTURBATES, IT'S PERFECTLY NATURAL, YOU'RE JUST INSECURE
Yes it belongs somewhere, and can't be factored out of any true emotional expression, but the assertion that it belongs literally everywhere at all times is patently ridiculous, not to mention, in the developed world, more often than not actually illegal.
>>68172267
>When men are sexualized they are never infantilized or utterly objectified
That's bullshit and everyone knows that sex sells
>I make billions of dollars to take my shirt off feel bad for me
What a bunch of cucks
>>68172014
T H I C K
>male movie star has to be a beefcake
>female movie star can be flat and be attractive
When will faggots and pedophiles stop running Hollywood? Don't care about guys...just put actually attractive women in movies please
>>68172267
Imagine a world where tumblr scum like this post on 4chan.
You are in it.
>>68172014
benis
>>68172014
The thing is Henry Cavil and Kit Harrington are only objectified because of the simple fact that they're shit actors and therefore have nothing else to offer. Same goes for Alexandra Daddario.
>>68172417
>scene served no purpose
I can think of a few more of those in the star trek film
>>68172626
I would suck a golf ball out of his urethra
>4.6% of male characters
>4.6
wew lad
>>68172014
Damn. Look at those chicken legs.
>>68172379
Some overweight Feminist in a tenured college position, duh.
That's how ALL these studies work.
>>68172014
Well, old movies didn't have it, so these faggots aren't allowed to complain before about 100 years of movies pass.
>>68174612
are you serious
they're bigger than his upper body
>>68172267
>Sexualization of men is much less harmful than that of women. When men are sexualized they are never infantilized or utterly objectified. Because men still retain the power sexually
Nice baseless statement attempting to justify your double-standard.
they need to stop being faggots especially the ones with very little talent and charisma like cavill who get by on their looks.
what I don't get is it being a new thing, or "worse" even.
>>68174878
>>68172615
IIRC they admitted that "wife prefers him fat" was just bullshit, she prefers him ripped, she just can't say that to press because it sounds superficial and if he eventually gets fat back again she's going to look bad
>>68174903
>>68172267
Quality bait. I'd just like you to know, I appreciate what you're doing.
>>68174878
its not that its new, its that all the shit they have to take will probably damage them in the long term
HIGH EST
I
G
H
E
S
T
>>68172014
>2014
IT'S 2016
>>68172267
>When men are sexualized they are never infantilized or utterly objectified.
Not rally /tv/, but what about boy bands? They're usually presented as being relatively young, chaste and inoffensive
>>68174878
>tfw anthony perkins buttfucked him and probably gave him AIDS
Feels bad.
>>68172014
>>68172581
>>68172591
>>68173154
>>68174878
>>68174903
>>68174999
MODSSSS MODSSS HALP
>>68172014
Why should I have issues with this? I believe there should be more nudity of all sexes, genders, sizes, races, everything.
The problem is people make issues with nudity making it into something evil, which directly leads to making sex evil.
Loosen the fuck up, and you'll notice making love not war is true. Greed, bigotry, war those are all the results of control.
>>68172267
Fuckin cis scum, minimizing my gender being sexualized.
>>68175435
>more nudity will end wars
tip top kek
>>68172267
True and noone can prove you wrong.
>>68175769
Actually it would.
Have you ever seen a soldier with titties in his face concerned about shooting people?
>>68174878
This pic supposed to prove anything?
There was none of that in movies like it is now.
i said this one time to a feminist and got an ear full about "how many have it so good and we have no right to complain". that's when i realized feminism was about tipping the scale in women's direction and not about equality.
I think a temporary tipping is justified to get women into certain places that are "men's clubs" but when they start saying that 'men's rights' aren't allowed they lose me
>>68172267
I agree with this statement
For all the angry men replying - you're in no danger of being sexually objectified, so why are you so upset?
>TFW bitches sexualize you
![sfv-alex-4[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9XZy850.jpg "sfv-alex-4[1].jpg")
>talking to girl at work
>asks if I've played Street Fighter V
>"yeah"
>"What's with the girl's bodies? Talk about unrealistic standards!"
>"All the characters are pretty unrealistic"
>"Not really, mostly just the women!"
>>68175948
Oh yeah whore show that ass
>>68172014
Wherever these 2 second gifs are coming from, It's becoming a shitty epidemic.
>>68176044
There is a double standard. Or does any of the male characters have mega tight pants or no pants at all so you can see his butt?
>>68175898
Objectifying some men is just as bad though. It increases physical and appearance standards to an almost unrealistic degree.
Women have been spending years trying to push realistic body types. Why would you welcome the same for us?
>>68176044
anon, one difference between men and women is women are capable of being jealous of fictional characters.
when I was a kid my older sister was annoyed by the big tits and fantastic bodies of Rogue and Storm in the Fox X-Men cartoon, and I felt nothing about the male characters bodies.
>>68175833
I think it always was there. Of course it was as racy as it could be for it's day. Everyone knew what was going to happen after Rhett carried Scarlett up those stairs - that was considered daring back then.
Every decade of the past however many years in Hollywood has had sex symbols, both men and women. Obviously women's bodies have been put on display more so than men's, or they were sexualized more or objectified more, but Hasselhoff was on Baywatch, too.
Art imitates life,and life imitates art so if you look back at the changes in how sex was viewed in society, you see those changes in movies. The thing that has changed is how saturated society is with it because it used to be newspapers (while Hollywood controlled the publicity of the stars), there were pinup girls during the war, then magazines (Playboy started, what, with Monroe on the cover?). Violence got more explicit in movies as time went on too, as 24 hour news on multiple channels showing it became a thing.
Now - sex, gore, you name it - it's everywhere, certainly all over the internet. And, what I was thinking as I posted the pics is that it's like it's a bigger deal because it's amplified with the way media covers things and how we communicate to each other, social media and all that.
I suppose I wasn't exactly speaking to the topic of the thread, I just wanted to point out that Hollywood studs isn't a new thing.
I've just always wondered at the ratings system and how sexual stuff and bodies are always seen as offensive and needing warnings, but violence is no big deal.
It's just the American Way, I guess.
>>68176102
So repressing nudity is the answer to keeping civilization more civilized?
No. People wear clothes to hide their bodies in shame. Others use their bodies for gain. The more the merrier. Stop trying to give peoples to hide in shame.
>>68176239
>Stop trying to give more reasons for peoples to hide in shame.
>>68176090
Tumblr.
>>68176090
/hm/
>>68175210
Tab Hunter is still alive. :)
you're right that Anthony Perkins had AIDS. he most likely got it long after he and Hunter were through with their in the closet super secret "Hollywood romance" relationship.
>>68176091
Sorry, you're going to ignore the bare muscular chests and arms as unrealistic body image for men, just because no tight pants?
>>68176239
I never mentioned censorship or suppressing nudity, though. But pretending like objectification only effects the people being objectified is retarded.
>Stop trying to give peoples to hide in shame.
But this is what objectification causes. It's been a huge problem for young women globally.
>>68176091
5/8 male characters are topless or can be topless. Sexualizing males has more to do with the upper body, not lower.
Kirk Douglas certainly didn't have thighs like Pratt.
>>68176411
>But this is what objectification causes. It's been a huge problem for young women globally.
No, it is because young women are what they want. We can only try to monitor limits on age, but people wanting what they want is an evolutionary part of their own biology. You can fight with whatever nonsense you've convinced yourself of but nature remains true to form regardless.
Although more transparency might help bring to light all of these sinister cravings instead of forbidding every intricate part.
>>68172591
It's called growing up doing sports, ya dingus. Something you missed out on. Crucial childhood muscle development that separates the men from the boys.
Also, walking around as a 270lb fatty for years and then cutting down to low 200s will do wonders for your leg gains.
>>68172014
I'm objectifying his quads.
Cool Hand Luke, 1967
Great movie, great guys movie.
>>68172267
>You will never see people say things like that about Henry Cavill. Nor will people try to grab his butt on set etc. etc.
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/255518/scottish-bartenders-stop-wearing-kilts-because-women-wont-stop-groping-them/
>>68172738
This. I can't tell you how many times my friends have justified going to see a shitty fucking movie by saying "but, anon, X was in it and he/she is super hot!"
It's twenty-fucking-sixteen. Google them, have a fap, and move on.
The roles where men are most commonly sexually objectified, hired cause they're hot?
Fucking Soap Operas. For real.
>>68172267
Oh really? You should google about actresses talking working with Chris Hemsworth on the Thor movies. Especially Jamie Alexander.
>>68172317
/tv/ btfo
>>68172738
If sex is used HBO style, i.e for no reason i dislike it.
If sex has a practical use, like the director purposefully pumping it to R-rating, i don't mind it.
If sex is actually important to the story it's great.
>>68172014
Who gives a shit. Theres nothing wrong with sexualization. I'm not offended by seeing some adonis rip his shirt off in a movie because I'm not an insecure blubbering cunt.
>>68172317
"sexualised attire" god damn it. Female sexuality is much more "nuanced" than males ffs, it's easier to point out male bait than female bait.
Characters which are made to bait females 100% will go often unnoticed by males. But everyone knows men like tits so obvious malebait is noticed by everyone.
I know girls who like fore arm veins more than six-packs. I know girls who like small "beer gut" style stomachs than ripped dudes.
http://nymag.com/thecut/2012/06/look-at-famous-shirtless-men.html
>Ah, abs. Those wondrous things that, because of the recent release of Magic Mike, we are reminded to give thanks for this week (a.k.a. Gratuitous Male Objectification Week). Today, we'd like to acknowledge the historical importance of some of the forefathers of shirtlessness — the guys who paved the way for today's Channing Tatums and Matthew McConaugheys. Would Baby really have had the time of her life if Patrick Swayze had been wearing a shirt during all those dance lessons? Would Marky Mark have been able to produce such good vibrations without visible pecs? And where would Arnold Schwarzenegger be today if an image of hulking muscles didn't come to mind every time someone said, "Hasta la vista, baby"?
>>68177039
>I know girls
>I know girls
I forgot what board I was on.
>>68172014
>Don't look good, squishy goys
People need to wake up. Denouncing the "sexualisation of men" is just a way to get guys to stop aspiring for their ideal. As has already happened with so many women. Just an excuse to be a fat blob. Disgusting.
>>68177136
what?
>>68172267
Fuck off Tumblr. You're kind ain't welcome around these parts.
who cares
>>68176752
Skinny kike
>>68177039
>I know girls who like small "beer gut"
do those girls also have a beer gut?
>>68177039
And I know faggots that prefer feet than tits or chubby girls over skinny ones. So what?
>Hollywood starts shitting out superhero movies about men with the bodies of greek gods in skintight costumes every month
>sexualisation of men in movies go up
Color me surprised
Notice how nearly every capeshit movie has a short maybe two second clip where the guy is shirtless? That two second clip is the only reason why women pay to watch this shit.
It's all about money.
>>68178218
>It's all about money.
>It's about what people want that makes money
Yes, of course but that fact completely evades the politically correct patrol.
>>68172014
>In 2014, 27.9% of female characters wore ‘sexy’ clothing and 26.4% exposed their chests, legs, or other body parts
>>68172283
Jesus Christ, that movie was a complete waste of time on every level.
>to always be put on a pedestal as a hunk is slightly demeaning. It really is, and it’s in the same way as it is for women
Kit seems like a chill dude, he never asked for this
>waahh I'm rich, look great and people find me attractive
Am I supposed to feel bad for them or something?
>>68172014
>Cavil and Chris Even both have stories about them being touched inappropriately on set by the female co-star
>Told as funny anecdotes during interviews
Why is this allowed?
>>68172014
Men complain when they find it annoying ot tiresome. Most aren't attention seekers in that way, even actors. Women complain when they fear losing their looks, or failing to compete, but they WANT the attention.
>americans don't realize all this naked buff men shit is trying to make them gay
call women sluts
love beautiful buff men
>>68181061
Kill yourself filthy faggot.
>>68172325
Don't know about Harrington but Cavill is definitely a shy beta at heart. If you don't get hot until after high school, it never leaves you.
>>68181061
sup /fit/.
>>68174903
So how do you get a stomach like that?
I mean its obvious he's not just holding his breath sucking in his stomach, did he do bench press with the weight on his gut and just pressed it all down to his spine?
Any /fit/izens here to answer this?
>>68172014
it is true though, we don't have action heroes who look somewhat "normal", like michael biehn back in the day for example.
and you can forget about someone like michael j. fox getting a leading role. it's the chris pratt / henry cavill thing going on. even ghostbusters had regular lookin' dudes.
>>68172014
No.
Most females don't operate on logic or fairness.
They argue with "emotions".
>>68172738
>I dislike sex scenes
Some sex scenes are done excellently though and genuinely propel the plot.
>>68172738
I hate when sex scenes are there just because of "lol xD we're so hardcore look at this rough sex!" And it serves no purpose to the story whatsoever.
>>68172014
DEM LEGS
DAT BULGE BOUNCE
>>68182700
Prime fox was a qt.
>>68181061I was already gay
>>68182576
Dude had a pretty small waist for a 6'3" frame tbqhwu senpaifam. Why do you need /fit/ to answer when we know you know your stuff. I'm sure you're built just like him. Stop being coy with me, anon.
>>68182576
he's sucking in his gut like a retard, damn 'physical' men from the olden days looked like dogshit
>>68173985
no homo?
>>68185673
see
>>68185472
or
Google Greg Scott Tarzan. there is a degree of shadow in that pic that is lightened in others that makes it look like he's really pulling in his stomach rather than just posing.
but fuck you anyway, you're an idiot.
here's another Tarzan actor for you. He filmed all three of his movies in 1965.
>dogshit
>>68185733
Of course, it's just bros being bros. Nothing gay about giving your best bro a sloppy brojob, maybe fondle his broballs a bit and then he squirts his brotein juice in your mouth.
>>68172267
>You will never see people say things like that about Henry Cavill.
That's because men don't get roles because they're "hunks", it's not like most of them even look like that between roles.
Let me explain something to you, Tumblr, men have to do about 10x the work a woman does to be "acceptable" in any action role, because all a woman has to do to look good is not be fat. Once a woman is not fat, it's their natural state, and that takes almost no fucking work compared to deadlifting 3-4 fucking plates like men have to do.
Pic related, it's a woman in an "action" role, being a spooky skeleton.
Men, on the other hand, not only have to not be fat, but they have to bulk the fuck up (usually taking HGH or steroids), so they don't really look like that outside of filming, unless they're REEEEALY into it (like Huge Jacked Man or Memepool).
Someone like Chris Hemsworth? During reshoots of the Avengers (for the shwarma part), he didn't really fit in his suit anymore, because he wasn't training.
Gerard Butler after 300? Lost it all.
Again, tumblrtard, to be the top 1% of men is at LEAST 10x the work of being the top 1% of women, because a fucking diet is not any kind of real work.
Why is the Cav so based?
>could always tell he was slightly uncomfortable in interviews whenever people would just focus on his looks rather than what he was trying to promote
>now he's vocalizing it
If only I could just play WoW with him. Just once.
>>68174878
>>68174903
>>68174999
>DYELs
pathetic
>>68186576
I-I'm sorry Henry, I don't mean to objectify you, I actually do appreciate you for your personality
>>68172014
hollywood pushing their beautiful people propaganda
ie. customers subconsciously increasing their standards. soon not even a waitress will want you unless you're chris hemsworth-tier looking
>>68172014
>>68186869
whoa there
>>68186576
he played WoW? Explain yourself
>>68172267
>>68182700
damn bill looks really sad there
https://youtu.be/EDskO7ZrfAA?t=254
Henry seems like a nice guy.
>>68186869
thanks YIFY
>>68186849
Go outside sometime, its pretty under rated around here and you save yourself the trouble of making shit up like this
>>68186869
WEW
E
W
>>68172014
>see Thor 2
>Thor has a shirtless scene
>women hoot like apes, whistle, catcall
>"just girls having fun!"
>>68172267
>Sexualization of men is much less harmful than that of women.
>Men and women are equal.
Pick one.
>>68172014
>Does this mean actresses will stop playing the victim card?
No it means everyone is going to have to play the victim hard even more strongly in order to get taken seriously by anyone because society is going down the shitter.
>>68172014
I don't really care, and most men don't
>>68187423
i care.. im sick of seeing naked women all the time.. I WANT TO SEE MORE DICKS!!
>>68186969
He's a WoW player, apparently he almost lost his chance to play Superman because he was playing WoW at the time they called him about the role.
>>68186576
i watched a few interviews with him and he seems to be more regular of a person than other stars
like when they were talking about his body and shit you could literally see that he doesnt find his fans adoring but cringes
>>68172615
Presumably she is feeling insecure. He was some c-list actor who was slightly fat but charming. Now he is probably the most bankable actor right now and is ripped. Then again, only a crazy person would cheat on 10/10 wife material like Anna Faris.
>>68187281
Hey if it's a race to the bottom we've got to win.
>>68172881
Mate you are gay. Stop lying to yourself.
>>68172014
i think Christian Bale's body in American Psycho is the literal perfection.
>>68172014
>Does this mean actresses will stop playing the victim card?
No
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10B9Fc8BmR0
>>68172536
We just wish that he wasn'tThe fat fuck
>>68188084
He was alright, 60's TV didn't require their handsome male leads to be super buff or anything as long as they looked pretty.
In fairness Cavill can't go anywhere with his sexy 19 year old girlfriend without being jumped by a gang of whores
>>68186498
Nice try cunt but guys get as easy bulked up as women _gain_ weight. Because that's what nature intended, manlet.
>>68176847
I hope that's sarcasm.
>>68186869
oy vey
