So apparently this is supposed to be really good? What the hell? How?
It's the jungle book you fool
>>68160634
I don't get it either, I want to see it, but I didn't expect it to be good.
I'm looking forward to it. The cast they have is great.
>>68160634
Has anyone seen it?
Is it already on theaters?
>make a movie based off a beloved and famous story with competent actors
>be surprised when it isn't a clusterfuck
>>68160634
I don't even like the original.
>>68160634
>100%
>>68161629
>not knowing how RT works
It means that 100% of critics agree it's a 7.6/10
>>68161777
>>68160634
Watch it and see you fucking idiot.
>>68161777
But what you said isn't true either
I will only watch it for Murray and Kingsley
>Scarjo
fuck that
Not really surprising. Great cast. Great director for this type of movie. Lots of good material to mine.
anyone wanna poo in the loo the kid?
I thought it was gonna be a grimdark gritty realistic version, but I heard it's not. So that's why
>>68164529
Yeah, I remember really loving alot of the sequel books as a kid, and from the trailer i think they go a little closer to the book rather than the disney movie, not gonna lie, i got chill when I heard baloo whistle "Bear Necessities" at the end of the trailer. Im that faggot that whistles songs to himself in public sometimes.
