I think we can agree that these two are the most similar in the series in quality, so now that the dust has settled, which one is superior?
>>68153349
3
>male protagonist
>no black people
>sheev
3.
It's flawed, but it does enough fresh that I can rewatch it.
>>68153468
hi pol!
>>68153349
>inb4 buttblasted anon gives all the 3-posters (You)s
>>68153505
hi dumblr
>>68153505
it's not even true either, there is a black person right on the poster
>>68153515
>inb4 Disney marketers defend Star Wars: A New Hope (2015 Remake)
3 because Sheev and high ground
3
TFA is like TPM to me, where so little happens that I have no interest in torrenting after seeing it in theaters. AoTC at least has the Kenobi versus Jango fight, Dooku, and the Clones. 3 does even better as far as things I can look back at, even if the CGI looks worse every time I see it. I'm still amazed how fluid some of the movements are however. I'll post one in a second.
This shot related. Look at the shots from the chin turrets missing and striking the ground. Look at how small the beam is from the side beam turrets that the droid heads are sliced like a knife. The lightsabers take more mass out after a hit, but these beams have far more reach.
Three.
This question existing is testament to the accelerating stultification of civilization.
>>68153623
Here we go.
Look how fluid that running animation is. It's a bit exaggerated, like how they'd run in Power Rangers. It's amazing considering they didn't have any of the armor made, which makes me wonder how they did the mocap.
Is it a meme to say 3 is better or are you all legit retards
>>68153623
>>68153752
Wow dope video game cut scene!
Anything else is wrong
>>68153769
see >>68153515
did you forget where you are?
3 is bad, but it had redeeming meme potential and non-gag jokes built into the movie like lava surfing.
TFA has nothing going for it.
Especially in how so much it does has been done elsewhere, us NEETs on /tv/ who spend too much time watching movies pick up on it far too easily. It kills the enjoyment.
Like some posters are saying, TFA has no rewatch potential.
>>68153871
you heard it here
3 is better becaue of memes
>>68153752
The stormtroopers in tfa still waddle when running.
>>68153769
Friend if you are triggered you can run back to you safe space
5 >> 4 >>>> 6 = 7 > 3 >>>>>> 1 >>>>>>>>>> 2You know it`s true.
III because of Sheev and Ewan and I don't have to listen to that cringey exaggerated bong accent (Sheev and Ewan's were more normal).
>>68153928
TFA is better than ROTJ. You know that
So, are we still pretending to hate TFA because it is popular?
>>68153979
nah, any movie with scary Sheev is better than TFA
>>68153349
As much as I hate the prequels, TFA is literally fanfiction pic fucking related
>>68153904
I don't mean the waddle from the armor. Look how his legs go out. At one point his right leg is out on the left side. Then when he mounts the droid, you see one of its legs go down as the trooper steps on it, then he hops up and is on top of it.
There's a nice movement and weight to everything. So often in CG things either feel too heavy like Snyder does, or too light like marvel does. ILM gets the balance right.
>>68153349
3 is miles better than that dogshit
>>68153623
>That Droideka shooting upwards and then rolling the fuck away when the gunship starts shooting
Say what you want about the dense scenes and bad CGI, but those little details make watching these webms worth it.
Delete the thread. The TFAggots are here.this is why 3 is better.
>>68153892
It is.
Literally why would you even rewatch TFA?
>>68154013
I can post 10 things even more retarded than that, all of which Lucas approved to be in EU.Star Forge, anyone?Father/Sisters BS in TCW?
That`s just the tip of it.
>>68153862
This is the first fair ranking I've seen. I like that it doesn't stick them into any linear order, but classifies them based on the content of the movie alone, regardless of how it compares to the other ones.
6 is certainly better than 3, but both are flawed but still solid movies. It's fair.
>>68154013
you could write any of them like that though
>>68154103
but anon, we're comparing 3 to TFA.
none of the EU even matters in this conversation. Could you please try to stay on topic?
I don't like star wars movies, but the last one felt more enjoyable than the other movies.
>>68154103
Starforge isn't even bad, it was just a giant factory in space.
Suncrusher is the thing that completely kills the old EU and makes it iredeemable
>>68153349
both sucks for different reasons
>>68153862
>2
>bad
You faggots don't understand that reality is far more simple.
Top Tier: V
Fantastic Tier: IV, VI, VII, I, II, III
Power Gap/ Other movies
Shit Tier: Christmas special, caravan of ewoks.
>>68154153
That pic is irrelavant to TFA as it`s never mentioned/explained on-screen.
In the movie, you have no idea idea about that pic you posted.
Talk about grasping at straws.
It`s the same EU garbage that some autist at Lucasfilm made up while sitting on the loo.
>>68154013
>phantom energy
>sub hyperspace
>instantaneous yet everyone still sees it
this is like seven layers of bullshit just to ive the new movie a fucking death star copy
>>68154187
but which one is superior? Answer the question.
It's like asking who the better dictator was: Pol Pot or Stalin? Then you answer both suck because I'm a millennial and making decisions is too hard for me.
>>68154198
daily dose
ROTS is kino
>>68153468
>>no black people
What did he mean by this?
>>68154226
>while sitting on the loo.
or maybe on the side of the street
>>68154226
what are you talking about anon? can't you follow the chain of conversation and realize you're not talking to just one anon?
It's like you're new to the idea of anonymity and nameless posting or something.
>>68153349
>I think we can agree that these two are the most similar in the series in quality
Nah. 3's a fucking mess and 7 is a watchable film.
>Anakin: You are so…beautiful.
>Padme: It’s only because I’m so in love.
>Anakin: No. No, it’s because I’m so in love with you.
>Padme: Then love has blinded you?
>Anakin: Well…that’s not exactly what I meant.
7 is nothing groundbreaking but at least it doesn't induce cringing
5 > 4 > 6 > 7
The rest are equally shit.
>>68154254
is there a program that makes these?
>>68153489
>literally ends with a recycling of the bnry sunset (edgerton even does the exact same pose as Luke)
>original
Prequelfags are so delusional
>>68154290
>7 is nothing groundbreaking but at least it doesn't induce cringing
>Stop holding my hand
>Droid please
>I'M IN CHARGE NOW PHASMA
>>68154301
No you lazy shlub.
>>68154303
>ends the series with an iconic image
shut up retard
>>68154303
Oh but anonymous, I never said any of those things. You made them all up because you want to argue with me.
>>68154290
>7 is nothing groundbreaking but at least it doesn't induce cringing
>Everything that comes out of kylo rens mouth
>Everything that comes out of finns mouth
>han leia exposition
>one character says something followed by another character repeating a similar line
>>68154303
3 has pottery as a way to link both trilogies (pretty much like what has been seen in the previous episodes).
The levels of pottery TFA had were so much inmense that you could even make a kid's pool out of clay.
>The ship that made the Kessel Run in 14 parsecs
>12 parsecs!
>Throw her in the trash compactor....amirite?
>>68154290
I don't want to talk about the 3 vs TFA debate for a second. I just want to talk about what you mean by "cringe".
Do you really "cringe" when watching other people do things? Do you consider "cringe" to be the same as second-hand embarrassment?
If so, why?
Why does it bother you when you see another person do something awkward?
When I get honest answers, they're usually along the lines of "I hate seeing people make the same mistakes as me", or similar.
If that's the case, it's certainly normal, but doesn't it also mean you're empathizing with the characters too much?
>>68153862
This is fair, but IV is at least as good as V
>>68154340
An iconic image directly ripped from ANH, yet people delude themselves into thinking the prequels are original
TFA has some thematic and structural similarities to ANH but at least it doesnt rip imagery wholesale besides maybe starkiller blowing up
>>68154388
What's wrong with any of those
>>68154466
>TFA has some thematic and structural similarities to ANH
>some
wew
>>68154402
>Everything british coming out of Reys mouth
>Every ot character needs a dramatic entrance
>Hans old man jokes
I don't remember technobabble in 3 like TFA had in that scene with the Falcon. It felt like Dr. Who for a second.
so 3, unless someone remembers technobabble I don't.
>>68154198
Look, I love III, but you're delusional if you think II is good
>>68154466
>what is not!Tatooine
it also stole that shot from Apocalypse Now.
>>68153468
TFA confirmed to be patrician, RotS confirmed to be for foaming-at-the-mouth hoi /pol/loi
Idk I gave 7/10 to both
The only star wars movie I hate is AotC that one is a piece of shit tbqh
>>68154466
>Last star wars movie reuses iconic scene from the first star wars movie
I don't see the problem
>>68154509
lots of technobabble on General Grievous's ship.
Emergency booster engines and shit
>>68154271
He is honorary white
>>68154509
because ANH had some technobabble to introduce to the viewer what hyperspace is, so JJ decided to copy that too.
>>68154466
Or an entire flight scene of xwings going in a trench.
>>68154509
That was a meta joke that most people didn't get. Ford used to complain about techno babble so the shoehorned some in as a joke.
Sheev is more entertaining than anything in TFA.
>>68154254
>top mid
Hnnnnng chills everytime.Not a single scene in VII made me feel close to that. Even if III gets tough to watch at times, I prefer it 100%
>>68154540
Are you me ?
Episode VIII is shaping up to be pure poetic kino. Rian Johnson is a fan of the whole series as apposed to JJ who only liked muh nostalgia.
>>68154537
Nice memeing friend, I really like your cool twist on the name /pol/, those big bullies keep talking bad about reyrey and fin :(
>>68154170
You're taking the EU wrong anon, you shouldn't be seeing it as a whole "coherent" narrative but rather a bunch of content where you're free to nitpick what you like and ignore the rest
>>68154402
You haven't listed anything even close to as cringeworthy as any given thing that comes out of Anakin's mouth.
>similar in terms of quality
I don't remember Episode III having funny dialogue, good acting, and well-shot action sequences.
>>68154628
The major meme here, friend, is the butthurt nonresponse and focus on use of terminology, and yes, hoi /pol/loi is clever.
I'm I the only one who kinda just like all the films. Like I'm not mad at anything. I don't get why people put the OT on a pedestal and I don't get why people can't admit a lot about the PT was shit. They're just flicks. TFA was a pretty good flick.
>>68154626
Reminder thet Rian Johnson has yet to make a good film
>>68154684
I don't remember TFA having those either
>>68154544
Not really. Emergency booster engine are just an easily understood way of talking about WEP like they had in old prop fighters.
It's the same idea of pushing engines beyond their safe limits when combat requires it, although in this case they made it a separate system because it's easier to understand what it does then.
After all, the typical viewer would probably assume that they'd have the engines at maximum no matter where they're going, which isn't the case.
I can understand what Emergency booster engines do just from the words. I don't know what a unhooking the superconverter from the engine mainframe or whatever they said means. It's babble. True technobabble.
>>68154558
I don't remember this. I thought hyperspace and the accompanying visuals was all the explanation they provided, since "hyper" and the image of the stars stretching is enough to convey that they're moving fast.
>>68154561
that doesn't make it any less annoying, especially if, as you may or may not intentionally be implying, they added the technobabble specifically to mess with Ford.
>>68154684
The opening space battle is as dense as you, tripfag.
>>68154684
>TFA
>well-shot action sequences
JJ's wacky camera work is the worst part
Fuck, I love this place.
>>68154669
>he's still reaching for anything as bad as Jar Jar or Anakin
Why do prequelfags take on these impossible, Sisyphusian challenges? Do they think they're in some training montage toward ascendant shitposting mastery?
>>68154684
Really, because I do. I also remember poor attempts at humor in both and hard to watch scenes in both. But at least III has the likes of Sheev's turn, order 66, basically all of its finale. Some may have, but I didn't find a single moment in VII that I enjoyed as much.
>>68154708
'TFA' is short for 'Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens.' That should clear things up for you.
>>68153862
7 is good tier
1 and 2 are bad tier
>>68154702
He competently directed bad films.
>>68154684
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YgHNtzxO0y8
TFA is not even a Star Wars.
why the fuck do they go on that ugly green planet with the castle looking turd?
That place is fucking hideous. There's nothing Star Wars about it
Stupid forest.
Compare in your brain the forest on Dagobah and the forest in TFA where Ren catch Rey. Why the fuck does that TFA's forest look literally like shit while Dagobah's fucking intringing ?
Pathetic TFA is
>>68154702
Looper is objectively good, kill yourself
>>68154725
>more shit in the frame = better
I bet you like Zack Snyder flicks
>>68154768
But who was phone?
5 > 4 > 7 > 6 > 3 > 2 > 1
>>68154802
No it's not, watch more films faggot
>>68154771
there is no "good" tier.
It can't move above "bad" tier because TFA has more flaws than "great" moments.
>>68154708
Isaac, Ford and Driver were all good acting wise, which is three more people than the prequels, who had one.
Action was a decent compromise between the geriatric Kenobi-Vader dual and the clownish, we-want-the-preteen-market prequel fights.
>>68154832
correct
>>68154840
>Ford was good acting wise
>3 is 3 more than 1
>>68154832
see >>68153862
you've got some dogshit movie-rating ability thinking you can just reduce ideas and their execution to numbers.
Patrician Rank:
IV>V>VI=III>VII>I>II
>>68154792
>TFA is not even a Star Wars because of a forest planet even though it's completely derivative Star Wars the whole way through
This is how retarded prequelfags sound.
>>68153349
4 > 5 > 6 > 3 = 7 > 1 >>>>>>>>> Ewok Movies > 2
>>68154832
Close.
5 > 4 > 6 = 7 > 3 > 1 = 2
>>68154871
This
TFA was a good movie.
>>68154871
IV >>>>>>>>>> VII > V > VI > III > I > II
>>68154838
Yeah 92 percent of critics and virtually the entire filmgoing public loved the movie but yeah it must truly be awful
Oh wait i forgot TFA being unanimously beloved was just a Disney conspiracy
>>68154885
patrician rankings m9
>>68154925
'no'
>>68154867
Oops, forgot to include Gleeson, and yes, Ford was good. Not excellent, but good.
III is terrible. The acting, the writing, the overuse of cgi, it's all fucking horrific no matter what "worldbuilding" is involved.
TFA, however recycled it is, is entertaining and involves sincere effort rather than meandering, self-indulging pap.
If you say III, then you sincerely need to hang yourself.
>>68154933
>Argumentum ad populam
Wew
>>68154698
Bro I was agreeing with you :( don't get so offended :^P we need to stick together to take down those /pol/ fascists!! #feelthebern
>>68154932
Fuck off JJ
>>68154967
the CGI isn't even bad compared to II, and there were a lot of practical sets included
![1378260675557[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/kUY0Ki3.jpg "1378260675557[1].jpg")
>There are people posting on this board/living that genuinely believe any of the prequels were good, much less as good or better than TFA.
Fucking faggots, all of you.
>>68154933
If you're going to shitpost, please be more subtle. This is an art board after all.
Wouldn't you say that a self-aware comedy is superior to overblown and flawed rhetoric?
>>68154967
This. Both were fun popcorn flicks, though TFA didn't swerve into the level of retardation than RotS did.
>>68154838
>there is no "good" tier.
I added one.
When will the V>IV meme die? V had the awkward Han and Leia interactions at the beginning and Luke getting taken by the Wampa for no other reason than to show he can take care of himself (to a degree).
Don't get me wrong, it's still good; everything in Dagobah, Luke vs Vader. A New Hope is more consistent though, and works the best as a movie imo
>>68155005
>This shit with some glitter on it looks better than this plain shit!
>>68155008
dumb frogposter
>>68154995
>imply memes weaken someone's point (a complete fallacy)
>attempt to out-meme them
>>68154933
>a lot of people like something that makes it good
Are you kidding? TFA was literally ANH, almost to the point of shot-for-shot.
The guaranteed commercial success of the prequel trilogy enabled Lucas to take a novelistic approach to this trilogy. The critical misgivings were misplaced because it was reviewed as three standalone blockbusters, rather than a unified story. The critics and fans who rejected the prequels are generation that don't read books, and have only Hollywood as a model of what storytelling can be. The RLM reviews typify this outlook. With patience, a wonderful work of art unfurls.
Episode 1 methodically introduces the characters and themes, much like the early chapters of a novel, or the early episodes of a HBO serial like The Wire. It establishes Anakin's separation anxiety, his oedipal relationship with Padme, Padme's conflict between her youthful idealism and premature political responsibility, Palpatine's politicking and Obi Wan's reluctance in mentoring Anakin.
Episode 2 seamlessly transitions from Anakin's troubled childhood to his early adult years. His difficult relationship with Obi Wan leaves him yearning for a strong father figure and leads him to Palpatine. Later, the death of his mother further pushes him into a doomed romance with Padme, his surrogate mother. Episode 3 brings all these plot points to a crescendo. Palpatine uses Padme to pull Anakin to the dark side, and it is too late for his negectful surrogate father Obi Wan to prevent it.
The themes of the prequels perfectly tie into that of the original trilogy. Anakin's lack of parental guidance creates a troubled adult. Obi Wan redeems this past error by ensuring Luke has a loving family. Luke in turn rejects the stoicism of the old Jedi and builds the rebellion on love and friendship. The saga comes full circle when Luke heals Anakin with unconditional familial love.
For all the epic intergalactic warfare, the driving vision of Lucas's Star Wars is beautifully simple: the child is the father of the man. We need loving family relationships to develop morality and courage.
>>68155044
>our all natural shit is better than this computer generated shit
Disneyfags everyone
>>68154967
>muh CG
which is an argument against bad craft, not bad filmmaking. It's no different than complaining about movies with bad special effects, like the final scenes of T1.
A good movie can make up for bad effects, since a good movie should be more than just visual spectacle.
There is a difference you know.your next post will assume I was talking about 3 because you want to have arguments on the internet
>>68155008
Fuck you. I genuinely take issue with anyone who praises the schlock that is TFA. III has some glaring mistakes, whereas TFA is safe, but fuck you if you can't see the emotion of RotS and appreciate its passion and high points.
>>68154977
>SEE I USED A LATIN LOGICAL FALLACY I LEARNED ON REDDIT AM I SMART YET
>Clearly I, as a single shitposter on the internet, am the sole authority on quality
>>68155084
TPM borrows more from ANH than TFA does. It's not even remotely close to being a shot for shot remake.
>>68153468
Mace Windu is in it, /pol/
>>68155008
None of them where as good as the original trilogy, so none have a reason to exist.
They're all garbage, but people haven't accepted that TFA is too.
Dumb frogposter.
You need to understand what we're talking about before you post.
>>68155152
>>68154914
I'm fine with this
>>68155088
>Disney and JJ
>all natural
kek, how are people still believing that?
>>68155062
>2/10 Canadian tier poor bait
>gets memed on
>j-joke's on you I get your being sarcastic haha btfo!
>>68155159
this is a pretty lousy meme you're forcing friend.
I should know.I started it
this is the only OBJECTIVE ranking.
/pol/ need not apply.
>>68155150
>whereas TFA is safe,
>Luke is in the movie for 5 seconds
>Han solo dies
>Villain is a sperglord manchild instead of a "badass" maul type
>Hero is a girl
The movie took plenty of risks, what the fuck are you talking about? The fact that you fags complain about everything i listed shows they DID take risks.
>>68155197
why did they even get rid of Lucas?
>>68155150
You don't need to ignore RotS's high points to grant that the sheer internal silliness and inconsistency of the film make it inferior than a safe but capable adventure movie. The Ren-Han scene and the Finn-Poe scenes are also plenty emotionally sincere.
>>68155233
this
>People actually liked TFA
Proof people in general have shit taste and that /tv/ is infiltrated with garbage people
>>68155233
>>68155270
samefriend
>>68155224
The only two I'd switch would be the first and second. I agree with the rest.
>>68155224
If we're going to post our shitty charts we pretend have more weight than the opinions that formed them, take this one too, shitposter-san.
3 is on par with 6. 8 is on the same level as 1 and 2, but it doesn't really hit the highs or lows of those two.
>>68155290
Very eloquent. You're clearly smarter than those idiots.
>>68155224
this one is better
>>68155150
III was garbage, kid. Deal with it. It was an embarrassment nobody loved, so I can see why you would identify with it so much.
TFA was a whatever film, but still outweighs all prequels combined. Lucas is a fucking hack. You're a tasteless faggot. I hope you never get better or grow up as a person, so that when you slip in the poopy and die, you go spinning into Hell. That would be the neatest trick of all.
>>68155233
This is a list of reasons the movie sucked. Are you fucking dense? Is the cognitive dissonance too much?
>>68155345
lol and by 8 i mean 7 obviously
>>68155355
Thanks babe
There mere fact so many prequel apologists are putting 3 anywhere near the same level as any of the OT is proof enough that they are a delusional subset of the population that needs to be gassed
>>68155381
It's a list of reasons why it sucks in the minds of fedora-wearing neckbeards, which is precisely why it wasn't "safe". Safe is just pleasing the old guard over and over.
>>68155364
switch 2 and 7 and you're golden.
>>68155429
>VII
>OT
did you even read the OP?
>>68155429
If you think TFA wasn't the shittiest star wars movie ever you are a walking embodiment of Reddit.
>I was 12 when episode III came out and I went with my dad to the cinema to watch it
Literally the only reason you faggots like Epiaode III so much. My nephew will probably grow up thinking that Episode VII is better than IV for similar reasons.
>>68155233
None of those are risks.
Luke was the big secret reveal. It's like saying the marvel post-credit scenes are a risk. They're not.
Solo's death had been asked for by Ford for decades. It's also the single biggest thing that got people talking. You can call it a risk, but it's a calculated risk at best, just like every movie ever.
sperglords are the hip new villains, so long as they're dark enough. It's the continued logical evolution from the dark antagonists of the 90s. Now they're dark not because they have terrible plans that usually involve drinking blood, but because they're a pathetic human being that irrationally hates others. Look at Zod, look at whoever in Quantum of Solace, etc.
The hero being a girl is again, nothing new. We already had this with the Alien and Terminator series.
>>68155472
>Reddit boogeyman shitposting
VII confirmed better than the prequels.
>>68155233
>Han Solo dies
Many knew that Ford was tired of Han Solo, it's not surprising that they killed him by contract.
>Villain is a sperglord manchild
Which wasn't a smart risk really, even if you make a villain that is not the deep voiced imposing figure like Vader, your bad guy should be at least competent and be a challenge. Not just some emo version of a children's cartoon villain.
>Hero is a girl
That wasn't barely a risk at all. For every person that disliked that idea, two were enthusiastic about it.
>>68155472
>am-I-cool-yet-/v/ underage memesters throwing the Reddit term around
>hates TFA
What a fucking surprise.
>>68155495
What constitutes a "risk" to you, then?
Making a shit movie like Lucas did with Phantom?
>>68155040
Luke got taken by the wampa at the start because mark Hamill was in a car accident that seriously disfigured his face, necessitating reconstruction. They added the wampa to explain his facial scars and changed appearance.
>>68155472
>Openly admitting /tv/ has shittier tastes in movies than Reddit.
>Thinking you just scored a point.
>>68155446
'no'
2 is a piece of shit
>>68155519
Redditors browse 4chan all the time, you are case and point.
>making a new Star Wars trilogy
>have the ability to be as creative and wild as you want with the ship designs
>literally recolored OT ships
>not even all of them
what the fuck is wrong with JJ?
>>68155376
tone it down kid. I'm giving you a (you) out of pity, not because you earned it. Lots of folks like you don't know how to make a good shitpost, so you resort to spewing diarrhea all over the page.
You have to plan it, like Lex did with his glass of piss.
You have to know how people respond to things, how to reel them in. I could tell from the first sentence that you where a sub-par shitposter, so I'm telling you now.
Step your game up. All you're doing is wasting An Hiro's bandwidth.
I'm not even shitposting, I'm just telling you honestly that you're in the batting cage thinking you're in the big leagues.
>>68155250
Inferior technically sure, but I'll never like TFA and will always enjoy III. It becomes a preference thing; consistency but blandness, or high points but ridiculousness. For my money, the payoff of III is worth sitting through the bad. I don't feel the same way about TFA
>>68155570
yeah ikr I just spotted one
>>68154871
That's not patrician, nor do you seem to understand what patrician means.
>>68154932
Now THAT is a patrician rank.
people around here seem to forget what Patrician means. It's not about people agreeing with you being patrician. It's not a popularity thing. Being patrician involves having a daring and unusual, but still supportable and quite possibly correct opinion.
you star wars "fans" are the fucking worst
>>68155570
>still Reddit boogeyman shitposting
is it 2014?
>>68155589
Pandering.
They rehashed the normie-tier popular vehicles and put them in the movie (X-Wings,Death Star, TIEs and star destroyers)
>>68155589
I doubt he had much choice in the matter. The marketing department told him that people love Ties and X-Wings above all else, so they had him cram those in.
>>68155601
>I'll never like TFA and will always enjoy III
At least you're more honest than most prequelfags, I'll give you that.
>>68155674
but he couldn't have included a single Y-wing or TIE interceptor?
>>68155628
I think you switched your replies. Based on your very own definitions, the first ranking was more patrician than Jeff Fagnum's
>>68155601
I bet you saw it when you were 12 in theaters.
>>68155547
I'd call making Forrest Gump a risk. Imagine this as a pitch:
we want to make a comedy about a retard who becomes a national hero, but we're not going to offend retards by doing so
That's a risk.
who thinks that's going to be successful?
>>68155637
TFA is a bland shitty movie not worth a rewatch. Samefagging doesn't make it any better of a film.
>>68155678
Because I'm not a prequelfag. I and II are garbage, and I won't deny that III proves that Lucas had no idea what he was doing. I've simply avoided falling for memes and stuck to my own taste
>>68155689
If you remove the flaws from TFA you end up with maybe 30 minutes of footage.
I can't call that anything but bad, sorry kid.
>>68155762
Bland it was not. Don't really know how you can claim this other than muh taste.
>>68155601
You're an autist, but the kind of autist I can tolerate.
>>68155762
You're in the minority. Don't act like you're not.
>>68155731
I bet you had to take your wifes son to see TFA while Jamal was over for her private yoga lessons.
reminder that he will always be right
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5919C8DE6F720A2D
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL56E3EB1DFD4B64A2
https://youtu.be/ABcXyZn9xjg
>>68155846
>MUH RT
this is all Disneyfags have
III was enjoyable but I will only watch it again ironically because it's laughably bad.
TFA was enjoyable but I will probably not watch it again for a while because it was serviceable but not mind blowing.
>>68155758
What the fuck? So it shouldnt have even been a star wars movie, in your opinion? Fuck off
>50 posters
>200 posts
wew lad
>>68155846
You are in the minority on this board. Just because many people think something is good doesn't make it good.
>>68155846
you're also in the minority if you don't like RotS
http://strawpoll.me/7349376
I don't want to waste a thread for this. I am curious however.
>>68155825
Thanks
>>68155599
>you're in the batting cage
>big leagues
>ceaselessly defending his happy meal movies with pages of text on 4chan.
Jokes aren't supposed to make you sad.
>>68155801
>unsheathes katana
Nothin personal kid
>>68155866
You know you've won when /pol/ resorts to cuck memes.
>>68155904
What is "it"?
I'm not looking to throw shit around, but you don't have a single subject in your post.
My response probably won't change however:
Only the original trilogy is good.
Nothing else should have been "a star wars movie" as you put it.
>>68155939
But I'm in the majority if I like TFA more than RotS.
>>68155939
I do, I posted >>68155224 this.
>>68155937
>user score
it seems like the average moviegoer is on our side :^)
>>68155978
You can't even meme right.
What are you doing?
>>68155698
The first ranking is possibly the safest of safe rankings. IV and V are usually trading top spots in most people's lists, VI, VII, and III are all generally considered middle of the road, with I and II coming in last with I before II in pretty much everyone's list.
That's a pleb opinion at it's finest. Not wrong, not at all, in fact I agree more with that ranking than the second one, but it's the plebeian opinion, plain and simple. The masses agree that's pretty much the right order, therefore it is not patrician. But simply disagreeing with that isn't patrician either, that's just being a contrarian.
The second ranking, that has balls, but it isn't so far out there as to be unreasonable. While I myself disagree with it, the argument could certainly be made for IV being a standalone masterpiece of cinema far head of all the others, with VII coming in next for taking some massive risks yet still being competently made. The case can be made for V being great but too slow, with poor pacing (though I would disagree, as great story-telling and world-building beats out competently made but derivative in story while taking some large risks in the casting). Everything after that is fairly pleb, as most people acknowledge that VI>III>I>II.
>>68155981
I've never been on /pol/ in my life except maybe once or twice out of curiosity. You really think cuck isn't a universal 4chan meme? Is this your fist time here?
>>68155887
It's really all you need.
>>68156038
But I thought mass appeal was the LCD?
>>68155846
you do know RT is literally funded by disney just look at all the marvel kino and star wars which are literally all complete shit desu
PAID REVIEWS
>>68156038
TFA's userscore was clearly a dogpile by autistic spergs, though. That is pretty common on metacritic
>>68153993
At this point we've spent so much time calling the movie shit we're starting to believe it
>>68156113
>It's really all you need.
Source?
>>68156143
Yet somehow Marvel flicks all get high marks while DC movies get shit on despite WB literally owning RT
>>68155992
He doesn't think Forrest Gump should be a star wars movie. I don't know why he's so upset, but I think I agree wit him.
I think we can all agree III is garbage.
>>68156154
ok Disneycuck
>>68156113
Good to know that RT is the be all end all in the quality of a film. No film on rotten tomatoes has ever had an unjust score.
>>68156202
Isn't TPM basically the Star Wars adaptation of Forrest Gump though?
>>68156090
This friend knows what's up. I could respect prequelposters more if they weren't all parroting the same horseshit, or were lower in number but sharper in opinion and reason. Instead they're just memekids, and their rankings reflect that accurately.
The fact that they choose the most critically and publicly supported prequel, Episode 3, as their battle standard is proof that they can't even think for themselves on these matters. It's like being a Hot Topic punk, and it's just sad as shit.
>>68153928
>>68153928
At least we all agree 2 is the worst
>>68156218
At the moment, there's nothing else to consult. In a decade when people have revisited it without bias, we can think about it again but for now, if we're going to compare two films, why not use the only available metrics of quality to judge it?
>>68153928
I'd have 7 over 6 but otherwise I agree
>>68156326
or we could have a discussion about it instead of parroting opinions from other people
This is a discussion board after all.
>>68156246
Let's see
>idiot savant (anakin has some sort of autism surely)
>Meets an unlikely series of famous people and political leaders (famous racers, jedi, royalty, sheev, ect)
>befriends a stupid black guy (jar jar)
>has an awkward one sided romance
>succeeds through infuriating dumb luck
This works for me
>>68156247
Regardless of how shifty the prequels are, they are infinitely better than TFA
>oh hey I'm marey sue and I can speak every language in the known galaxy, I can also repair and fly any ship in the galaxy and I know the inner workings of the Starkiller base well enough to open a locked door. I can also use jedi mind tricks, resist mind manipulation,move objects, and expertly wield a lightsabre all without former training! Gee I'm just something aren't I!
>>68156471
You can cite sources while discussing things, it can actually help your argument in case you didn't know ; ^ )
>>68155240
>implying those two clips have similar levels of CG
>>68156143
That would explain those fresh ratings for Tomorrowland and Maleficent
>>68156610
Do (You) work for Disney?
>>68156500
An 8 year old Anakin single-handedly defeated an entire droid army by himself accidentally.
>>68153349
Hahahahaahah, no
VII is shit
>>68156500
>>68156668
btfo hard
>>68153752
that looks like a commercial for world of warcraft
>>68156535
opinions aren't facts.
we can say that a majority of critics found TFA to be a "fresh" movie, and we can also say that a majority of audience reviewers on RT/metacritics/wherever found TFA enjoyable.
We cannot say however, that these are the true majority opinions, nor can we conclude that this is a flawless opinion. The audience reviews are especially subject to this, as we cannot trust voluntary polling.
If the goal is to discuss among ourselves whether TFA was a good or bad movie, I don't see how these things will help us. In fact, the only source I see being useful is TFA itself.
>>68154198
this might be the worst forced meme in the history of /tv/
fuck off already, stop pretending that a dreadful movie is good because of a few decent cgi shots
>>68156660
If I did i'd probably be deriding Episode VII. My sister used to work in one of their offices in Florida and she called it Mousewitz.
>Didn't get to see some twi'lek booty.
Didn't like TFA.
>>68156668
>>68156786
The prequels suck, is comparing them to TFA the only argument you have for it being a good movie?
>>68156668
>>68156786
Nice samefag
>>68156926
This entire thread is about comparing TFA to the prequels.
Friendly reminder TFA is dogshit, the only reason it might be better than AOTC is Hayden Christensen, and if you paid to see it in theaters and pay to see the next """""""Star Wars"""""""" in theaters you're a mindless drone.
