Is this really necessary?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNo76q7PAis
Money might be made
I don't know but I'm hype
Yes it is.
The setting looks fantastic, the main character
or the little bit of perfomance we saw from the
trailer too. One of the most interesting things
about Potter, was the world around it, and this
saga seems to explore that.
>>68116796
I didn't know Colin Ferrell was in this. Still doubt I'll watch it.
>>68116796
>tfw you can't even look at Eddie Redmayne because you know you'll never spend a lazy sunday cuddling him as you marathon the Harry Potter films together ;_______________;
>>68116796
I probably would have gone and seen it if it didn't have Eddie Redmeme in it.
>>68116796
hype is real. i love the wizarding world JK created.
max comfy
>>68116796
if this movie has even a tenth of the creativity and invention of the tiny little encyclopedia it gets its name from, we are in for a treat
>>68116796
>Colin Farrell
>Eddie Redmeme (seriously though, he's still a good actor with decent range)
>America
>1920s America
>1920s WIZARD America
>more world building and less Chosen One bs
Sign me up fampai.
>>68116796
>Eddie redmayne as lead
>David Yates as director
>Jk Rowling as writer
This can't be good.
>>68120159
The only shitty part is David Yates
But since there isn't a book for him to fuck up it might be alright
how fucking old was dumbledore if he was a teacher at hogwarts before the 1920s?
>>68120564
He was 115 when he died.
> gangland-era wizardry
I can't spread my ass cheeks wide enough for this
Looks cool
>>68116796
it's gonna be liberal propaganda
>>68120808
In what regard?
At worst it'll be typical "Murica was so bad for minorites and women, we've come so far" schlock.
>>68116796
>The Wizards in Britain have a 19th century feel
>not making the American wizards having a 20's or 50's aesthetic
I think I did a little bit of Art Deco in that trailer, but still. I like the idea that since America is prett new for wizards (mostly Salem, plus Native Americans and some Voodoo in the South), their look is newer, and closer to modern muggles, but still lagged behind a bit.
>>68121078
The movie is set in the 20s.
>>68116796
Wew lad, another trailer
>>68120808
As opposed to the original movies which were about being accepting of aids and foreigners and preserving your unique culture is bad
>Wizard G-men
My body is so ready
Is there even a villain in America, what the fuck?
I thought gay-rasputin and snake-eyes were britannia only
>>68121192
It was about elitism being bad.
One can love and preserve their culture without eliminating others.
>>68116796
Looks fuckin' neat.
Might be cool, plus I'm a sucker for Victorian shit.
Did the opening theme make anyone else think of X-Files?
>>68116796
Honestly my primary concern is to see how realistic the New York skyline will be.
>>68121262
The Weasleys deserved to be looked down on for having more children than they could afford. Any non magic community would have disliked them too.
Harry was from a broken home and was abused as a child
Hermione was an autistic loser and was only friends with the other two since she couldn't do better
>>68121338
>Victorian
nigga...
>>68121530
Shit, this is America now.
This is still the 20's though, isn't it?
>Dumbledore is headmaster
So how old is he? like 200?
>>68120564
he was born in 1881
I'm glad to see the Harry Potter universe being explored.
An Aurors procedural series would be cool.
>>68116796
This a prequel ?
>>68122665
Like 70 years before the first Harry Potter.
>>68122978
cool
