>make Avatar thread
>0 replies, or "fuck off with your pocahontas ripoff"
>make Star Wars meme thread
>hits post limit
When did you realize /tv/ was full of plebs?
>>68055007
This is what butthurt haters actually believe
0/10 cry more
>>68055007
When you refused to swallow your pride and stop frogposting.
>>68055062
>hating on the #1 Meme Of All Time That Changed The Reddit Forever
>>68055154
>>68055007
When you started posting
>>68055007
>When did you realize /tv/ was full of plebs?
When I realized the vast majority of posters here have never walked into the polls absolutely hammered and voted for Trump.
>>68055007
/tv/ likes James Cameron but it doesn like Avatar.
dont mention the smurfshit and stick with his good movies and you might get a thread going.
make avatar PEPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>68055381
when did you realize /tv/ was full of PEPE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>68055381
god you're horrible, faggot. typical underage /tv/going shithead. standard-issue dumbfuck. another miserable pissant without the slightest clue as to what a blessing this man has been and is being upon the world. doesnt understand the indelibly cherished impact this gleaming, distinguished beautiful human being has had on the planet at large. of course garbage posters like this aren't keen to look into that, either. they're hard-wired to yak up the same old memes til they just aint funny no more, so their opinions are natural extensions of the omnipresent bought-out media machine's latest propaganda efforts put forth to salvage scrap flesh from their increasingly irrelevant carcasses. like fucking clockwork. you LOSER ass, go to hell
>>68055583
Avatar is so taut and perfectly layered that it makes my head spin. It clearly wasn't trying to please everyone, though, as evidenced by the plebs on here. It has a real vision and real ambitions.
If you want a simple narrative and paint-by-numbers filmmaking, go watch your shoot-em-up cop films and capeshit.
Avatar appeals to the few of us who enjoy challenging complexity.
Cameron knows that the public is aware of Dances With Wolves; that's precisely why he references it (and probably 50+ other American films). This is called an homage, and the masters use homage to keep a "conversation with history" going. He includes well-worn tropes and plot points to lure you into a far grander story.
The very best artists do this. They leave breadcrumbs in their stories that work as subtext and establishing a film in cinematic history.
The fact that you can't see this says a lot about your general lack of expertise in the subject of cinema.