all women are mary sues so wouldnt a mary sue be relatable for women?
>>68041019
No because they aren't actually useful.Kek
Women are the opposite of mary sues, they are hopeless at everything that doesn't involve either dishonesty or housework.
>>68041019
>Paul Lynch
>Relating to a female character
Can this "relatable" thing fuck off already? Who cares if a character is relatable. A movie isn't better for me if the protagonist sits around jacking off and shitposting on /tv/.
>>68041019
>please be a relatable female character
>paul lynch
>>68041128
>Who cares if a character is relatable.
That's right! Screw trying to tell a decent compelling story, dammit.
>>68041218
The two have nothing to do with each other.
>>68041218
You don't have to relate to a character for them to be compelling
Dumbass directors still don't get why Ripley worked.
>>68041372
For that anon i think you do. He's clearly seen less than 500 movies in his life
>>68041397
She worked because she was a likable character in a shit film (Aliens, not the original).
>>68041078
this
men are better at everything, including traditionally female careers
>>68041452
>Aliens
>Shit film
Genre snobbery is full pleb.
>>68041019
It's a movie for male audience.
Why don't they just cast an eyecandy actress and make her role decorative. It's the best way to not ruin the movie.
I mean females have their YA and their chick flicks, their soap operas and almost all TV except sports.
They can have as many strong womyn characters as they want in them.
