Why is no one talking about Eye in the Sky?
>>68038514
The patricians are too busy posting about Star Wars and BvS silly.
>aaron paul
No way this flick is any good
>>68038514
Because it wasn't that great desu.
A little better than average, but entirely unrealistic and not nearly as good as a great film in the genre like Syriana
At least this time the director did better than he did last time with Rendition.
>>68039028
He was the weakest part of the film
Loved when Rickman told that fat bitch off at the end
>>68039028
This movie was very bad.
The 'poignant banal' scenes were pathetic. diplomat on the toilet, general buying toys in military regalia, etc. telegraphed like a childrens cartoon. fundamentalists heroically attempt save girl, well done. Drone pilots crying, senior airmen giving a major back sass, bird camera, insect camera.
the kenyans were kind of interesting.
movie sucked. reminded me of that shitty dennis quaid movie where they replay an explosion 10 times for 2 hours. vantage point?
6/10
>>68041617
Yeah, movie should have been about five minutes long. Targets loading up for bombing. Boom! Too bad about the collateral damage.
It's awful bullshit. I seriously almost killed myself after watching it.
>>68041617
>This movie was very bad.
>6/10
Your review was very bad.
83%
