ITT: Fuck you, I liked it
>>68032195
Why?
>>68032195
ITT: Fuck you for liking it
>>68032195
It sucked
>>68032195
Fuck you, I liked it too.
>>68032195
Sorry OP, this thread is never going to take off since the entire world agrees Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a terrible mess that shits all the original movie.
Oh me too, it was full of wacky futterwacken
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dosfiJdr0g
>>68032195
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/charlie_and_the_chocolate_factory/
I assumed this shit was going to have a 20% when I checked many years ago. Shit is sitting at 83%.
>>68032360
What an ugly movie
>>68032360
...what the shit...
>>68032360
Is that fucking real
>chocolate factory
>>68032195
The people who hated this movie are the same who hated Baz Luhrmann's The Great Gatsby.
>>68032360
i don't understand why this exists.
How did this even get made.
Who thought this was good in any way
>>68032454
yes, it's 1 of the final scenes and almost completely ruins the otherwise decent flick
>>68032387
Critics can be pretty weird. Practically everyone agrees that Indy 4, Star Wars Episode II, Star Wars Episode III, The Matrix Reloaded and Terminator 3 were massive disappointments but all of them have good RT scores.
>>68032360
This is the opposite of comfy.
>>68032503
People with taste? The only Luhrmann film I thought worked was Romeo + Juliet
The rest are just crammed with shitty ideas and hyperspeed editing that just makes them awful to watch
>>68032360
The fuck was the point of that Burton?
>>68032195
r u me
>>68032589
It was futterwacken! It was wacky! Are you not feeling the wackiness?
>>68032353
You do realize it was supposed to be based more on the actual book right?
>>68032503
That's because they're both steaming piles of shit. Tim Burton lost his touch a long time ago and Baz Luhrmann is an insufferably awful hack. Baz's style is "DUDE QUICK CUTS AND OBNOXIOUS, INAPPROPRIATE MUSIC LMAO!"
It was goofy and corny as fuck, one of the funniest capeshit movies made.
>>68032626
No one gives a fuck about the book desu. The Gene Wilder movie is what everyone remembers and loves.
>>68032195
Will Wonka, I'm ASR
>>68032626
pretty sure the original book had no mention of Deep Roy copy pasted 100's of times.
>>68032701
Don't ever fucking reply to me again unless you're contributing to the thread.
>>68032683
>it literally applies to everything
CHARLIE IM CHOCOLATIER
>>68032721
the meme that just keeps giving
>>68032634
if Venom was cut out, we'd have a Spider-Man 4, 5, etc.
>>68032634
6.5/10 movie. It would be an 8/10 if the studio hadn't forced Raimi to shove Venom into it.
>>68032626
Autists overrate accuracy to source material. The Shining TV mini-series was far more accurate to the source material than the Kubrick film but no would ever deny that the Kubrick film is far superior.
>>68032767
>>68032683
im done
>>68032360
How the Christ did this horseshit make a billion dollars?
>>68033099
>>68032804
>>68032841
spot on lads
It's just as good as the original. Fight me.
>>68033274
I don't need to fight you, you've already lost
>>68033109
Foreign markets. China literally won't watch movies if they aren't shit
>>68033422
This is what their own country passes off as cinema.
>>68032195
I will forever like this movie because it was playing on an airplane where I sat next to my gf of 7 years.
>>68033422
I've been saying this for years, the Chinese only pay to see garbage so they can slowly destroy our culture.
>>68033508
>From the head animator of Shrek
The climax is great, the opening fight/chase editing is the only bad part, the rest is fine.
It gave fuel to my fetish so I was fine with it.
Also I liked most of the set design.
>>68033422
proof that TFA was good.
>>68032634
THIS. it's a decent 7/10 movie.
>>68033581
Agreed
Fun and comfy af tbvh
I don't even like Ryan Reynolds all that much, but this movie was bretty good
>>68032360
I seriously thought this was a scene from a Friedberg and Seltzer parody at first.
>>68033962
This movie was great. It and Tremors were 10/10 classroom "horror" movies.
>>68033982
that's not really a "fuck you i liked it"
Lots of people like it because it's great.
>>68034119
I genuinely did not know that. Just saw it on Amazon Prime a few weeks ago, but never looked into it much
Swardson was right, marketing fucked it over. If it was marketed like an R rated comedy and if it wasn't associated with Happy Madison, people would be calling it a cult classic.
>>68032195
That's good, anon. You're free to have your own opinions, you're not required to adhere to /tv/'s groupthink
It isn't good, but it isn't bad and I enjoy watching it.
>>68035054
It's good, it's just that the problem is that it's not great because it had the potential to be.
>>68034860
The visuals never bored me. Well until Doomsday showed up.
>>68035007
Post-Spaceballs Brooks is kinda weak but still okay.
>>68035283
I don't care what anyone says, Robin Hood: Men in Tights is a really funny movie.
I think the Burton one is a lot better than the original. The first has Wilder, and everything up to and arguably including the crazy boat ride is classic, but after that it falls off fast. The movie also looks and feels extremely cheap. The Burton one really captures the sense of magic and strangeness throughout the whole film, even if the production design and effects aren't great.
>>68032503
Lurhmann's Gatsby was executed terribly. I've never seen a movie more over edited for no discernible reason
I don't even remember the rest of it, but I'd watch the whole movie just for that badass mech army vs sentinel swarm scene.
