There has never been a single good superhero movie.
Not one.
Superhero movies are made by and for children
>>67938695
Agreed
I liked Blade just fine, suck upon my titties
>>67938695
True. I tried watching GoTG because people said it's different, but it was terrible, like if somebody with no creativity and talent watched Star Wars and thought, hey, I could do this too
>>67938695
>SOMEBODY ARGUE WITH ME! PLEASE!
>>67938695
Disagree. Next thread.
>>67938911
/Thread/
>>67938695
>It's a 23 year old tries to flaunt his maturity episode
Superman 78 was fine cinema made by and for adults and children of all ages
Alk Kekko Kamen movies were pretty good.
>>67938695
Shouldn't you be posting cuck threads?
>>67938995
That's literally all of /tv/
>>67938695
The first statement doesn't necessarily leads to the second.
Try again.
>>67938772
lmfao, 33% on Rotten Tomatoes, you child. Embarrassing choice
>>67939046
>if nobody has heard of it, maybe they wouldn't realize it's shit
Try again
>>67939026
Hilarious bad special effects, the most phoned-in Brando performance of all-time, an irrational and frankly stupid story, and idiotic characters. Terrible choice
>>67939072
>>67938995
>>67938980
>>67938911
>>67938875
Middle schoolers detected. Do you guys play video games and drink Mountain Dew also?
Take it to /co/ and /v/ please
>>67938695
WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG! MoS, BvS, Ironman 1, Captain America Winter Soldier, Punisher (2004), Blade and the first Avengers were GOAT
>>67938695
define good
>>67939152
>I have to use Rotten Tomatoes to give myself an opinion on something
>>67938695
Is The Crow a superhero movie?
>>67939152
If you really want to argue that superhero movies are shit, you really shouldn't rely on Rotten Tomatoes
>>67939152
You look more juvenile than everyone on this thread. Ironic.
>>67939152
Not the same anon but fuck you for pointing out effects from a movie made in 78. They looked solid for the time. Stop being an underaged faggot and appreciate something for its value beyond its effects.
>>67939152
>Rotten Tomatoes
Fucking dumbass ruined his entire argument
What's the point of this thread? Did you just want to try and agitate people for attention?
Ask me how I know you're under 25.
>>67939306
H-how do you know I'm under 26?
>>67939198
>>67939217
>>67939261
>people who study and judge films for a living don't know anything about it! trust me, my six-year old emotional reaction to the film is much more important than respected and educated adults!
I already gave you my opinion in the OP, it was merely confirmed by the critical establishment. Your task was to provide an example of a quality superhero film; what was provided is one that is considered mediocre at best by virtually all serious film critics.
>>67939356
No matter what we say you'll have a predictable reply. Why ask?
Again.
What is the point of this thread?
>>67939356
>people who study and judge films
clearly you're an autistic troll, and you're clearly retarded if you actually believe the people who post reviews on RT give objective reviews.
>>67939152
It's so cute watching morons like you try to back up your argument while citing Rotten Tomatoes.
And by cute I mean kill yourself, pleb.
>>67939356
>people who study and judge films for a living don't know anything about it! trust me, my six-year old emotional reaction to the film is much more important than respected and educated adults!
So if we go by that logic, you could have find plenty of good superhero movies backed by the critical establishment on RT
Weakest bait I've seen in weeks.
>>67938695
>rotten tomatoes is the be all end all for movie review
>>67938695
As a Redditor with over 100k karma i must disagree. Look up Mr. Nolans Batman Trilogy (it's not for everyone but i believe you're smart enough)
>>67938834
gotg is way better than sw
>>67938695
Imbecile
>>67939393
The point of the thread is confirm once and for all that superhero films are made by and for children.
Which they are. They idea of a superhero is fundamentally an infantile fantasy of a watchful paternal figure who can correct societies wrongs. Basically a Donald Trump/fascist's wet dream
>>67939169
>MoS
>BvS
Well... at least you didn't sayThe Dark Knight.
>>67939601
You clearly put more thought into your insults than your actual arguments. Have a nice day.
>>67938695
Here are three excellent ones OP
>>67939644
>being a butthurt marvelfag
anon pls
>>67939870
truly the greatest capeshit of our generation
great post anon ;^)
Super was pretty good.
>>67939407
I don't think you understand how RT works
>>67939870
Birdman is partially a reflection on how superhero films are commercial products empty of artistic promise, and in the movie almost they destroy an otherwise talented actor's career
Captain Nationalism is a propaganda movie for blockhead Americans
Nightcrawler is not even a superhero film
>>67940059
>Nightcrawler is not even a superhero film
says who? Nightcrawler is one of the best X-men movies.
>>67940087
underrated post
>+1
>>67940139
>redditor is le mad at le may may
Superhero movies are juvenile
>>67940038
>thinking rt uses an objective list of benchmarks to make it good.
>i defend rt when it's to sustain my argument!
Objectively retarded
I shall post some capekino in this thread, to refute the OP
>>67939601
Dude is your fedora on to tight?
Could The Matrix be considered a super hero movie? The whole film is about finding The One
>>67940252
I never defended it, though. You just don't understand how it works.
>>67940286
L'homme araignée- tome deuxième*
Not knowing french. Tsk, tsk, are you a nigger or something french?
>>67938995
MY INTELLECT IS FUCKING SUPERIOR! YOUR INTELLLECT IS FUCKING INFERIOR!
>>67940369
Les jours d'un passé futur*
We're going to be at this all day, aren't we anon?
>>67939152
Hahahaha the effects in superman 78 are better than the last Avengers movie
>>67940479
>>67940365
I could do this all day, yes.Its true, I don't speak frog. Thanks for the lessons
>>67939356
>RT scores matter only when I SAY SO
>>67940369
>>67940322
>>67940286
whoever was insecure enough to make these does not speak French and chose terrible screenshots
The reason I think this meme isn't very funny is that is puts the ignorance of its creators on full display
basically, you can only find it clever and funny if you actually think these represent affectations of culture or that some of these frames could be considered beautiful
>>67940628
>>tell it to the guy who did the same thing to Man of Steel and The Dark Knight rises :^)
ITT: OP tries to prove he's not a basement dwelling autistic virgin by trolling superhero movie fans
>>67940628
It's making fun of those people who are spouting the "capeshit is killing cinema" meme
ie: you
>>67940867
Damn right.
And now in colour!
>>67939547
>>67939527
Jesus christ are you kidding?
>>67940912
leave the capekino to marvel
>>67940867
no, it's an insecure lashing out at people who acknowledge that superhero films are terrible and people who enjoy them don't know much about movies
the people who do this are anti-intellectuals content to frolic in mediocrity and the cinematic equivalent pig-shit, and they're angry that anybody would choose not to
i.e. you
>>67940867
It's actually proving them right because you think you're taking images of important meaning and deep composition but you're not. It's taking shallow images and making it French and b&w; to a retard this means it's the same as actually film but to a normal person it doesn't.
>>67938695
>>67939152
>Batman '66
>bad
>implying
Redditor spotted
>>67941026
>how dare people like thing!
You're the insecure one.
>>67941037
It's a blockbuster, not an art film.
>>67938695
How do you define what makes a movie "good"?
Unless we establish that this thread is going to spiral into epic levels of butthurt and autism fueled shitposting on both sides.
>>67941096
Yeah and it's shit
If those images are trying to convey that the only difference between a blockbuster and art is the aesthetic then they're complete failures
Also, blockbusters can be good. It just so happens that 90%of the ones about superheros aren't and that's for a reason
>>67938695
"no"
>>67938695
Dedpul
>>67938695
There has never been a single good movie.
Not one.
movies are made by and for children
>>67939601
>The point of the thread is confirm once and for all that superhero films are made by and for children.
So you're saying they made it for you.
>>67940328
>a set of critics judge a movie
>hard to grasp
Hyrr durr
>>67938695
batman begins?
>>67941156
>>67939175
These guys bring up valid points. Answer them, faggot.
deadpool?
>>67941025
nice catch
>>67940059
>superhero films are commercial products empty of artistic promise
That's not untrue but I fail to see how being entertaining commercial products is somehow wrong. It's definitely better than certain movies that try to be artistic and deep and just end up coming off as pretentious and full of itself.
>>67938695
Wrong
>>67939882
>butthurt marvelfag
I just think they're garbage, is all. Batman has been done far better.
>>67940059
>captain nationalism
>propaganda
Kek you didn't even watch the movie it seems.
Oh and most marvel movies+nolanbats are highly rated in Rotten Tomatoes.
Does this mean they are awesome? I mean your argument is that critics understand a lot about the subject so if they say it's good...
>>67939152
kek
The '78 Superman effects were highly, highly praised at the time. They were revolutionary in a lot of ways, and Brando's monologue is hardly 'phoned in.' It's great.
though I think Singer made the most of his monologue in Superman Returns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Sq-BTMJ2eQ
>>67941026
But you're responding in an insecure fashion.
>defending capeshit outside of capeshit threads
it's ok to like shallow children's movies but don't go saying that they're not shallow children's movies
How has nobody mentioned Spider-Man 2 or X2: X-Men United?
Not even Unbreakable by M. Night Fämälämädingdong?
>>67941375
DISNEY presents! Marvel....A Cinematic Universe.
>>67938695
;_;
>>67941356
Going a little meta here but unless you're doing it for free. Most movies aim to make some money. The actors directors or whatnot are nothing more then selling points. To some extent its product advertising.
That being said. You can't say le movie is a advert when it all is. I mean the biggest one was the lego movie but that was entertaining as fuck.
>>67942162
So?
>>67941434
Unless your talking burtons batman then no not really.
>inb4 the meme knight.
Ledger carried that movie not bale.
>>67941547
Im no. t i know what im getting into when i watch capeshit but still enjoy them.
They are ment to be enjoyed and i use them as an escape. ( i grew up with these stories in cpmic form so i like tp see it come alive.) i don't act like im trying to see the "deeper meaning" or act like these are "art house"
>>67941451
Conmence the butthurt autism remarks in 5..4...3...2
>>67941197
They are good to a lot of people. You're just a pseudo intellectual with a side of huge butthurt.
The fact you're using a subjective term good to be objective in film shows how idiotic you sound.
>>67941356
This.
It's like candy. Sure it's not good for you but it's nice to have a Twizzler once and a while as a treat.
>Select all Recreational Vehicles
Indeed