>>67847008
I liked it

>>67847015
I too liked it quite a bit

>>67847008
it was good you cuntbag

>>67847015
me too desu

>>67847015
same

OP here, I liked it too.

Anyone else think calling it Cloverfield was a bad idea?
Goodman rambling about ayy lmaos would have sounded even more ridiculous had the movie been called "10 Banefield Lane" or whatever.

>>67847008
>Not liking this for the claustrophobic thriller it is.
Phag.

So is Cloverfield becoming some shitty unrelated anthology series about monsters, aliens and fuck knows what else? I don't think I'd be very hyped for that.

>>67847008
copied half life designs then made them their own

either make a game movie or don't. Going half way is just stupid

Any torrents of this or the Witch?

>>67847138
This is what I was telling a friend just the other day. If it wasn't associated with Cloverfield then I would have been going back and forth on whether the aliens were real. But since it's in the same universe you know he's telling the truth.

>>67847008
utter shit

Literally a claustrophic film with a shit ending and barely any interest, revamped by a smart jew executive to be involved with a previous cult film fans desperate for a sequel

If you think it wasn't rewritten to be unbelievaly loosely based to Cloverfield you are a moron

I don't know how anyone could dislike this movie. I can see how people don't think its absolutely amazing, but not at least feeling neutral or "meh" about it? Not possible.

>>67848088
Yeah they basically ruin any tension and atmosphere the movie could have had.

There were times where it's like "Hey maybe he is lying and is crazy... Oh wait, cloverfield, yeah he is telling the truth all along"