at the end of no children for old men, is it implied that he dies?
>>67699658
yup
>>67699658
Worst movie ever. -100/10
>>67699729
why?
>>67699768
Just kidding I shouldn't have posted that
>>67699729
Not enough quips or action scenes if I do say so myself. It was so dull and pretentious.
>>67699658
Yes
>>67699793
>>67699768
I mean it's pretty obvious. A strong single black mother and her bastard child will be the ones repopulate the world. The only thing it forshadow was London becoming a third world shit hole.
>>67699801
DCucks still salty.
>>67699857
I did pick that up when watching it. We see this whole 'new world' thing a lot, with niggers and so on being the face of progression.
Look at Star Wars, Han was a bumbling old white cunt, while Ridley and Boonga were the face of the future. Han was passing on the torch.
>>67699863
Not a Dcuck. Just making fun of all capeshit. Children of Men is actually one of my favorite films of the decade.
>>67699658
Yes. He dies.
>>67700202
that's not definite
>>67700234
its implied tho
>>67700265
i think the girl on the boat would have a better idea about his liveliness than we, the audience would. When she saw the boat she was still talking to him as though there was a reasonable chance he was still alive.
