>Shitty YouTube compression vs actual HD quality
I can only imagine what it'll look like in IMAX 4k.
>>67663799
The extra resolution doesn't make the lighting any less shitty and artificial looking.
>>67663842
Go choke on fast food you fat, retarded piece of shit.
>>67663873
I can choke on all the mcfries in the world and they still wouldn't be as salty as you.
>>67663799
i can't believe there's so many that think this movie will do well.
it's going to get lukewarm reviews and be forgotten. it'll be in a redbox in no time and only make a little bit more than what it cost to make.
they're going to try to make a sequel but it'll either be in development hell or be received worse than the first one.
>>67663842
They're still working on the lighting. The Durotan & Lothar scene with Blackrock Mountain in the background was significantly different when they showed it again this month.
>>67663799
time to grow up, kid
>>67663842
Nice qualitative buzzwords there master memer. Care to explain why the lighting isn't good, or do you want to just want to call it good with that meaningless assessment?
>>67663799
Looks like vidya senpai
>>67663996
Is there a comparison? I'd like to see a side by side
>>67664000
I have. I've grown up from colored comic book drawings to interactive games.
>>67663964 (You)
REKT
>>67663799
>vs actual HD quality
Where can I watch the version on the left?
Watch your trailers on iTunes site, their quality is much better.
See: https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/67469186/
First is iTunes, second is YouTube.
>>67664011
This. Making these sorts of criticisms bannable would be a good place start for cleaning up the morons here.
>>67663979
>>67664074
http://thedigitaltheater.com/index.php/warcraft-2016/
Download the 'Trailer D (Lossless)' version.
There are also a few 4k versions of the trailers on YouTube but you won't get the full effect of them unless you have a 4k screen, and even then YouTube 4k isn't the best.
>the sensitive orc is brown
the big bad guy orc is going to be white isn't he?
>>67664011
Well aside from how uneven the lighting is on the models and how overly glossy everything looks, the actual lighting has way too much of a "glamour" vibe to it. There's just a shitload of unmotivated, impossible lightsources going on in OP's screenshots. It's the kind of lighting style that someone would use for a flashy magazine photoshoot, so dialed-in to perfection that it loses any sense of realism it could've had. Also it looks like they used one of those cheap ugly AO methods for whatever reason and it makes it look like a fucking video game.
>>67663799
>>67663873
>>67663996
>Thank you for your support. Your World of Warcraft subscription has been extended by 3 days.
>>67664362
Nah, they already did that in the hobbit.
>>67663964
#BURNWARD
>>67664037
Well there's this: http://imgur.com/a/ggGhX
>>67663964 U
DELETE AND THEN REPOST THIS
>>67664365
I'll take your word for it instead of the award winning people working on it. Not.
http://www.warcraftmovie.com/images/
>>67663979
>>67663979
Universal sucks at promoting this movie but it'll probably be good.
>>67664532
>instead of the award winning people working on it.
Like the award winning people that worked on Hobbit: Battle of the 5 Layers of Vaseline?
>>67664757
Nother him but just stop
>>67664917
Not*
>>67664623
how is source code compared to moon? i loved moon but haven't gotten around to watching the other one yet
>>67664757
>it would look much better with me in charge.
Kek
>>67664973
It's not as good as Moon in my opinion, but still a decent Sci-Fi.
>>67664757
>Peter had no time to set up the movie
>1 book 3 movies
What did you expect?
>>67664365
Critique pic related?
Are you guys ready to see some pornshire ERP action on the big screen?
>>67664532
I'm not saying the lighting is BAD per se, on a purely technical level and out of context it's good looking. If this were a full CGI movie I'd even praise to the aesthetic they'd be going for.
But that shit don't look realistic in the slightest. The fact that it's supposed to mix in with live action characters and settings is the problem, it sticks out like a sore thumb.
Not watching vidya-shit unless it's 60 fps like my glorious video games.
This movie isn't 60fps.
>>67663842
As a kid I thought the CGI in the prequels was god tier. Millennials have suspension of disbelief towards CGI because we grew up with it anon.
>>67663799
The preview in IMAX was atrocious. Fucking ps2 graphics
The right one actually looks more realistic
>>67664973
Didn't like it. Much more Hollywood approach compared to Moon.
>>67663799
the orcs look good but the cgi green-screen backgrounds are fucking awful.
>>67666299
How thick are your glasses?
>>67663873
SALTY AUTISM
Nobody is going to pay to see this garbage.
>>67666000
hahahaha
>>67666000
nice digits devil man
>>67664623
>tfw Warcraft will inevitably flop and prematurely kill Duncan Jones' career
>>67664714
>also, Anduin Lothar has a daughter, not a son
who cares? his children never amounted to anything
I didn't even know he had a son
>>67666282
Saving this post once the film comes out I'ma post it again, and you better reply back whether it's good or not.
>>67667492
Plot twist: Jones makes a fantastic movie and becomes the king of vidya.
>>67667630
People who pay WoW are fine with paying for a grindfest.
They'll buy tickets.
>>67666000
MFW his mold for the regular horn broke
Warcraft will be the new Avatar. Ok at best movie everyone will go see, because it will became a meme. It will make billions.
>>67667717
Warcraft is already a meme. Kek
>yfw this movie flops because normies don't care about Warcraft and NEETS will just torrent it.
>>67667895
>people who pay for a subscription to grind every month are going to pirate
no anon. they love throwing money downthe drain
>>67666000
>tfw these pose no problem once you learn to circle-strafe
>>67666000
what the hell? Is that Caine?
>>67663799
How is this even possible? This looks realer than real life...
>>67667895
There's still millions of dumb slobs who PAY to play this shitfest of a game. If even half of them go to see it it will make tens of millions of dollars easily. And I'm willing to bet it will drag in more than half of all people who played the game at some point.
>>67664965
This is the only still released that looks passable (except for bandolier and its metal clasp)
>>67663799
The compressed version looks better, in that it hides the harshness of the light which makes it appear like it's been filmed on a cheap sound-stage with tonnes of exposure. On another note the body looks like jelly, but I can't identify what makes it appear so.
What OP said about ambient occlusion is true, especially around the locks and arm-band (which again is made less obvious by the compression). The only thing that looks real is the sub-surface scattering on the strands of hair.
>>67664965
>>67664181
>>67663799
big pauldrons and cgi air
more like worn raft
>>67664405
I prefer the old
>>67664973
okay sci-fi flick
>>67667492
It has a big fanbase already, it's a genre that appeals to normal movie-going audience and Duncan Jones wont suddenly make a shit movie because the source material was related to a video game. I am sure it will be fine.
>>67663842
And you must be some lighting expert from Pixar studios or something right? Fucking entitled cunt, thhis looks way better than any marvel shit
