>watch Naked Lunch
>Expect awesome body horror
>It's just a bunch of homo shit
>>67662500
>not reading the book
>not loving steely Dan
Nice dubs but you're a pleb
>>67662500
>>67662532
I agree you gotta read the book. and its probably the funniest movie ever!
> I can think of 2 things wrong with that title
Its a cool adaption by Cronenburg, but the book is a whole nother level of mindfuck, because he literally cut it up and reassembled the pieces. The jumbled words work subconsciously on your brain in a way a linear narrative film can not. Now, if the film was itself cut up and rearranged, that would be closer to the effect of the book.
>based on a burroughs novel
>surprised by homo shit
buddy...
what about sack lunch?
>>67662500
Sexual ambulance you say?
>>67662899
>The jumbled words work subconsciously on your brain in a way a linear narrative film can not.
Oooh, you've got my attention. I love mindfuckery like this, like House Of Leaves or John Dies At The End level of weirdness.
can someone explain the ending?
>>67663081
Naked lunch is pretty tame compared to a later trilogy of his. I read "the soft machine" when I was in mental hospital, it fit the general tone and environment very well.
Burroughs also made a few cutup films in the 60s, one is called "towers open fire". Well worth a watch. Influenced Brian Eno's music a heap too.
>>67662771
The book is a piece of shit
>>67662500
so, not nyotaimori?
