>Thankssssssssssssssss
Why did the snake thank Harry here?
I don't know
>>67561394
Voldemort?
Snakes are nice, is all.
>>67561394
It's considered polite to thank someone who helps you.
he let him out of the cage
the movies would've been better if all the snakes spoke English to Harry instead of that bullshit hissing language
>>67561394
It couldn't stand watching the fat fuck Dudley squealing away.
>>67561394
Removed the glass and allowed it to escape...only to die slowly in the British climate or to be captured again.
>>67561394
>Harry is able to speak English with snakes in the first movie
>needs to speak parsletongue in order to communicate with serpents in every movie after
snek
Probably considering Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>>67561394
what did he mean by this
>>67561642
I'm sorry you don't appreciate fantasy, it happens to be my favorite genre. With the creative confines of our eorld, fantasy allows authors to extend this creativity
>>67561596
It's a matter of point of perception.
He never realizes he is not speaking English and constructs an immersion during the first movie.
>>67561394
What does it feel like to get a blowjob from a snek?
>>67562649
it's pasta, newfag
