Why did Jackson ruin this with outrageous physics? Cut out four or five scenes and you have a good trilogy.
Yes, cutting down pieces from a turd will make it less of a turd but it's still a turd.
The Third one was The biggest piece of shit and disappointment i have ever seen. No fucking Story, only constant stupid action. Just awful
>>67560999
why are they all the defining chapter
>>67560999
Whilst Adamantium Wheelbarrow and Non Newtonian Gold were stupid, they didn't kill the trilogy. The trilogy did. The story was 1-2 movies at best, until spread and filler made it shitty.
>>67561280
All 3 are for Five Armies.
he didnt care, he just wanted the money he got scammed out of for making LOTR
Best fan edit?
>>67561099
this was a memorable scene in the same spirit as the books
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JBHPFiFWRk
if the entire trilogy was done like this my faith in humanity would be restored and I could sleep at night
>>67561528
there were a lot of amazing scene in the trilogy, just a few too many. My expamples would be the eating scenes in the beginning and the scene with Gollum. They were perfect. The second one wasn't terrible, if the third was a little better it wouldn't have been a bad trilogy at all
>>67561723
The third was fucking shit, honestly
>>67560999
Why? Because of his kike overlords. Lord of the Rings had years of preproduction. Hobbit had almost no preproduction and was made "on the spot".
>>67560999
>outrageous physics
I don't think that means what you think it means.