I need help with what I just watched. I don't think i've ever been this disturbed from a movie.
was there an antichrist?
was she possed?
Defoe was a machine
is it not capeshit enough?
>>67373900
the best theory I've read was that it was a reverse birth of christ, so instead of someone being born, someone dies(her) and the 3 animals are the kings
there was more to it, but thats what I remember
>>67373843
CHAOS.... REIGNS
>>67373843
I fucked a girl while watching this. Good times.
>>67373843
You were disturbed by a dull film with a lot of juvenile provocation posing as italicized "art."
>>67373843
Watch more Trier.
Scarred me from masturbating comfortably.
>>67376073
its a woman who wants to be killed as a sinner instead of a sinless man who gets sacrificed for mankinds sins.
thats why its called antichrist.
>>67373900
>was she possessed?
she was depressed.
>>67373843
Don't feel disturbed. There is nothing wrong. The director is just making fun of people.
2nd worst movie out of 1000 for me.
>>67373843
I saw this at the Toronto International Film Festival in 09 and someone had a seizure and puked on the floor.Mission accomplished.
>>67377244
That's hot.
Watched this with my mom in the theater. It was... awkward. She cried a lot when the baby died.
Did she kill her son because wants to be bad?
>>67373843
Qatch Melancholia and Nymphomaniac too, it's a pretty good trilogy.
>>67377244
Did you bust when he was cuming blood?
>>67380441
>Watched this with my mom in the theate
Why?
There's a good analysis of this movie on YouTube but I can't find it now.
desu its just about the LITERAL nature of woman senpaitachi
>>67381095
We both like Trier.
The scene were she crushes his balls made me turn it off. Sexual violence against men is really disturbing.
>>67381454
It made me hard.
>>67373843
I read an article that said this movie is misogynist. Is this true?
>>67381538
It portrays a woman as a psycho bitch who abuses men and kills her son.
Had the roles been reverse they would also call it misogynistic because then a man would be abusing a woman.
Basically it is whatever you want it to be.
>>67373843
Von Trier is such a shit director holy fuck
complete edgelord with a bbc fetish
>>67381640
he aint shit
but most of his films are more like artsy porn than artsy cinema
>>67373843
>I don't think i've ever been this disturbed from a movie.
Really?
>>67373843
God made Man, Nature made woman.
Nature is Satan's church.
All women are slaves to nature.
All women are evil.
All women are the Antichrist.
>>67373843
>was watching this movie
>got a boner
>had sex
how does it end, spoil it for me f.am.
>>67384339
As usual, /pol/ is always right.
Movie was beautiful in an artistic sense
are there any other interesting documentary's about women.
>>67381538
If anything, it shows how fucked up mankind is
>>67380441
>Watched this with my mom in the theater.
Did she like Dafoe's cock?
>>67381640
He has some great films. Watch Dogville and Breaking the Waves.
>>67381454
Honestly, I'm going to get called a cuck or whatever, but the part where she snips off her clit was infinitely more disturbing.
![3756f[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/8yu54A5.jpg "3756f[1].jpg")
CHAOS REIGNS
>>67385396
>posting some tripfriend talking to himself over his pc/cellphone combo.
>>67385406
It does bothers me a little seeing my favorite character of all capeshits getting his nuts cracked
I get a feeling that nymphomaniac is a more developed version of this movie.
From the perspective of numphomaniac we see the woman in this movie is trying to achieve a mind of superman or something through these torturing.
Did Lars meant to say that all women are inherently evil or did he just wanted to tell a story about a psycho bitch?
>>67385544
i still feel like antichrist is intended a sequel to nymphomaniac
given that von trier's films are usually characterized by absolute definite closure, and nymphomaniac didn't have any of that
also charlotte and willem are both in both of them and not explicitly named in antichrist and there's the obvious callback to thekid falling out of the windowthat crops up at one point in nymphomaniac
>>67385001
That is not Dafoe's real cock anon. It's a porn stand in.
Dude sexual violence is art lmao
Dude if you can't watch insanely disturbing and sadistic movies then you can't appreciate art lmao
>>67373843
>Dafoe: "Hello?"
>Agent: "Hey dafoe, I found this movie for you and the script is fant-"
>Dafoe: "Does it have unsimulated sex?"
>Agent: "..no?"
>Dafoe: "Bye"
>>67388531
i love that we get cock&balls within the first 5 minutes of the movie
>le demiurge
>le misogyny
>le racism
ummm.. Hello? it's 2016AD, not 716AD
Trier is a sadist. He wants his audience to feel as depressed and shitty as he does. Every single Trier movie has made me want to stop being part of the human race.
So the woman crippled her son and her husband to find a good reason to punish herself?
>>67376441
hehehehahehee
but seriouslythat fox eating itself
