>C-C-Come on guys, R-R-Rotten Tomatoes said it was bad, r-r-r-right?!
That movie is bad you dumb fucker. Even the audience didn't like it.
Why are you typing like that? Is there something wrong with your hands?
>>67370361
>that movie is bad you dumb mother fucker
>even though I've never seen it, boy I'm a dumb mother fucker
Anyone who's seen Return of the Living Dead 2 agrees that it was better than the first.
It literally pulls an Evil Dead 2, and for some reason critics have a problem with it.
>>67370400
>Anyone who's seen Return of the Living Dead 2 agrees that it was better than the first.
No.
>>67370400
Gonna have to disagree with you on that one, buddy.
>>67370310
Rt didn't exist in 88 stuttering retard
>>67370400
>better than the first
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
NO SERIOUSLY
FUCK YOU FAGGOT
That is literally the most wrong thing I have heard in I don't know how long. You do realize that Return of the Living Dead is the film that brought us Tarman, correct? Easily one of the greatest movie monsters of all time. Get the fuck out with your wrong opinion.
>>67370495
Kung pow is the only movie that was too deep for critics.
>>67370400
Part II was just sections of the first film that got cut. The studio stitched them together to get a sequel out.
>>67370400
>Anyone who's seen Return of the Living Dead 2 agrees that it was better than the first
>>67370495
you know the rules
>>67370400
Better than the first MY ASSHOLE
Forever immortalized in the image form, this post will go down in history as The Most Wrong Post of All Time. Be sure to save this gem.
>>67370400
>It literally pulls an Evil Dead 2
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat? Return of the Living Dead and Return of the Living Dead Part II are both horror comedies.