ITT: legitimately wrong and misleading rottentomates scores
Batman v. Superman
It should be lower
>>67368127
Whenever you're ready.
Hook
Jumanji
The Mummy
101 Dalmations
The Hunchback of Notre Dame
Basically everything I liked from the 90s tbqh.
Disney strategically makes movies to appeal to the most demographics and tastes possible.
They knew that the people who would flock to this would be old fans, new kids, and nerds who would probably see it anyway.
>>67368127
I agree with you I thought it was a weak 6.5/10
Too many references and the dialog was poor. It lacked perspective and weight too, like you always forget about where you are in the story
TFA was good you cuck. People need to understand now Rt works
TFA wasn't THAT good, but it was carefully designed to be a crowdpleaser/apology to rebuild the brand, and it's not at all surprising that 92% of reviewers liked it.
>>67368289
>6.5/10
And that's a positive review. Do people not understand how RT works?
>>67368291
>TFA was good you cuck
>iqlet memer thinks tfa was good
no surprise
fucking /co/ cancer
Cannot stand this movie. Action scenes/cinematography are ok. But all the other elements (especially unbelievable characters/story) are awful. Everything is contrived to fit the message of the movie and comes across as pretentious rather than a decent allegory.
It is likely propped up by people who agree with the hamfisted social/political message.
This is the best film of all time according to Rotten Tomatoes.
(100% with the highest no. of critics)
>>67368391
I mean I liked the movie but I can feel you. It was honestly a 7/10.
>>67368289
this. film made for the ADD generation. everything moves by so quickly to the point of becoming nonsensical
i stopped watching when they got in the millennium falcon and she instantly knew everything about the ship and how to fly it
>>67368396
2 > 1 > 3
So its pretty accurate.
Prove me wrong.
A rotten tomatoes score can't be wrong unless the algorithm it uses to collect reviews is flawed. It is not saying "X is a 9.2/10" it is saying 92% of critics liked it and merely liking it can mean great to just ok. If you know this and you still shitpost about RT scores you're a retard actively taking away from discussion.
I feel like people only care about these scores because once you have a number you can shitpost merely with that instead of actual ideas with any thought behind them. Its easier for an idiot to say "X has X score Xfags on suicide watch!!!" than it is to actually break down what you disliked about the movie itself and post that instead. By continuing this retarded meme you are only making the board culture worse and worse as it becomes more normalized with each post. I realize it's stupid to complain because maybe this will never change but that's just my thoughts on it. If you honestly believe a RT score is "wrong" however you are literally just saying people cannot like the movie, not that it is bad but that others can't enjoy it and in that case you're a baby so eager to shitpost you lack a basic understanding of what you're talking about.
>>67368441
Agreed familia, it's just surprising that even other perfect Pixar movies (like The Incredibles) have below 100%.
>>67368289
>>67368440
Rotten Tomatoes gives percentages based on positive reviews. 6.5 is a positive review and therefor your opinion would count to the movie's fresh score. Idiots.
>>67368396
It's up there as one of the best, they aren't wrong.
>>67368127
Fuck you. I mean, this is the last resort you have to defend that shitty movie?
Grow up. It's just a movie. Enjoy it, no matter what the critics say. For God's sake, grow some personality.
>>67368597
Are you new here?
>>67368180
This. /thread
>>67368454
REEEEEEEE
>>67368499
yes, and a 6.5 contributing to a 90% score is misleading
use your brain next time before posting
>>67368127
>>67368440
Remember when Luke knew how to fly an xwing like a master with no training
>>67368499
who says 6.5 is a positive score?
the shit
>>67368127
Aaaaaaaand here comes the sour grapes from DCucks. TFA was way better hamfisted grimdark shit.
>>67368659
luke was a pilot or some shit he specifically mentioned that, the girl is just some junk scraper
but that's trivial, maybe ships are easy to fly or have standardized systems, etc.
but how did she know the layout of the ship?
>>67368691
i did
According to RT scores, we're on the golden age of cinema. Hollywood is better than ever and it produces timeless masterpieces every season
>>67368778
Because she fucking worked on it.
>>67368778
Rey specifically mentions it too. She even seems anxious about flying the ship ("I can do this..."). Luke literally says to Han that he could fly a ship himself, and he doesn't need Han, then tries to walk out of the deal.
>>67368127
>>67368720
it didn't compare to the theatre productions
>>67368778
you all need to work on your lore
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/T-16_skyhopper
how did you think luke and biggs knew each other?
Supergirl has a 97. Daredevil S2 has a 75.
>>67368289
That is being way too generous.
>>67369393
Not really
>>67369313
>click the Canon tab to see if it's still canon
>it's because it was featured in this
>>67369526
Yeah really.
Its like someone microwaved the last night's leftovers, added a different sauce and you thought it was a new dish.
tl;dr you have no discerning taste OR you love the same processed crap over and over.
>>67369562
I didn't know Titan AE got a remake.
>>67369601
lol well memed, champ
