How are the reviews so mixed? I'd like to say it's because the critics want DC to fail but I'm worried.
>>67349177
Because the first half is really good, but then it becomes a mess because the producers wanted to set up the Justice League movies
>>67349177
>37% = mixed
Kek
Movie sucked senpai
>>67349177
>it's because the critics want DC to fail
Why would critics want DC to fail? What kind of autistic logic justifies such retarded thoughts?
Genuine question.
freelance journo here, i saw it with a bunch of other journos yesterday and every one of us had a different opinion, so i for one can understand why they're so mixed
>>67349283
But that's not true. The movie is almost exclusively focused on Batman and Superman. Aquaman, Cyborg and The Flash are practically just mentioned in passing. Even Wonder Woman is barely in the movie until the last 20 minutes. The Dawn of Justice subtitle is actually pretty misleading considering how little the movie does to establish the Justice League. It's almost like that subtitle was thrown on as an afterthought just to remind people that "yes, we have a big team up movie coming out soon, too!"
>>67349317
It's a 9.1/10 on imdb
>>67349459
Yes, because all the fanny flustered DCucks went and rated it a 10 without even seeing it.
>>67349177
People, especially critics, are conditioned to like reddit-tier lighthearted quippy Disney Marvel Saturday morning superhero funtime flicks.
Here's something different, complex and pessimistic and makes you think a little, and like children most of them complain it's no fun, has no jokes, and the good guys are meany-heads.
>>67349177
>How are the reviews so mixed?
Because some medias are paid or get benefits in kind to make positive reviews
>>67349506
>like children
You mean like how these movies are for children?
>>67349353
>freelance journo
Stopped reading there
>>67349487
Like the Marvelfags who haven't seen the movie but know for sure it sucks because 37 people on a website said so?
>>67349506
>Complex
Lol. Go watch something other than capeshit you disgusting pleb
>>67349576
>thinking and forming opinions yourself
it's 2016 grandpa
>>67349536
So you think Blade 1 or Punisher is a kids movie? I bet you eat fried butter slabs for breakfast.
>>67349638
Those movies don't take place in the marvel universe.
NO ONE IN THIS THREAD WATCHED THE MOVIE
YOUR POSTS MEAN NOTHING
>>67349580
I have. Doesn't change the fact that compared to the average Marvel film, BvS is complex. Not that it makes it better, but it's a change of pace from the usual fare.
When is the capeshit bubble finally going to burst?
>>67349459
It was at a 9.7 with like 10k votes before the embargo was even lifted lol
>>67349177
I think that maybe the movie looks way too much like a Comic Book, i'm going to watch it today and i expect to like it.
But i can understand why it's getting mixed reviews. I mean, if i show my parents/critics something like Final Crisis, they're going to think it's too confusing and weird, while most DC comic book fans love it.
But if i give them something like Justice League: Origin or any Spider-Man/Deadpool Marvel comic book, maybe, they're going to enjoy it a bit.
I'm not saying DC is too complex for the general public, but it's clear that DC is complicated and maybe Zack Snyder delivers it but Critics and Normies aren't going to like it because it's DC anyway, and DC is not as edible as any marvel comic book.
>>67349536
Children can definitely watch BvS, but I wouldn't say it's for children. I've seen the film and it's pretty dark and depressing. I'd say it's targeted mostly towards an older general audience of comic-book nerds and action movie fans.
>>67349662
>Marvel universe
what the fuck is this shit? Something Marvel/Disney came up with like when Disney announced that everything aside from Star Wars 1-6 and TFA was non-cannon?
Kill yourself, you tool. Holy shit.
>>67349681
>complex
You mean is a mess.
When did /tv/ turn into plebbit, is there going to be a sticky so all the fanboys can pray for better reviews
>>67349737
This is spot on. I'd say if you're a huge DC fan or even a fan of something like Sin City or Watchmen, you're going to really like this movie. I've seen it and I'm surprised at the low score the critics are giving it, it's way better than how they're portraying it.
Batman looks like shit
>>67349177
>critics want DC to fail
No one is interested in seeing DC fail. Moat of the people who are critical of their films are either people who really like their comics and are mad because they squander these amazing characters on terrible fucking movies and hire complete hacks like Snyder to make them. The other people who are critical are not necessarily fans of the comics, but are movie buffs who are dissapointed that Warner Bros can't get their heads around how to make a good superhero film.
>>67349857
Except Sin City and even Watchmen got far more favourable reviews when they came out.
Just came back from the movie, ask me anything.In my opinion, it's a good movie. Not amazing, but pretty nice. Except Lex, who is an annoying little cunt. But the trailers ruined it for me, it spoil almost everything, and i'm fucking mad at this, I should've known better.
>>67349459
The site where you can make hundreds of accounts and votespam 10s?
>>67349576
It's 65 now, and they're actual film critics and not bots.
>>67349506
Yeah because The Dark Knight totally didn't get 94%.
>>67349737
>>67349857
>>67349506
>people are actually deluding themselves into thinking that the movie is ''too mature and gritty'' for movie critics
You people are caricatures straight out of an ms paint comic mocking fanboys.
>>67349506
its pg-13 movie about characters made for children
Holy shit, when did /tv/ become so fucking pleb?
I haven't posted for over a year and i comeback and you fucks are crying over a capeshit getting bad reviews?
This thread is pure fucking gold
Because Batman v. Superman is legitimately a clusterfuck?
Man of Steel came out, and they let Snyder do his darker and grittier take on Superman as the first entry into their DC Cinematic Universe. When that movie performed slightly worse than expected and was bashed by critics, Warner Brothers started to panic and scrapped their plans for Man of Steel 2 and a solo Batman film. Instead, they opted to make a Batman/Supes team up movie right out of the gate. When response to this announcement was met with positive, they went all in and decided to call it "Dawn of Justice" and cram in even more shit to make it a direct lead in to a Justice League movie.
The end result of all this was an over bloated mess that tried and failed to juggle multiple comic book arcs, justifying the mistakes made in Man of Steel, and setting up the JL all in one movie.
It's literally the same thing that happened with The Amazing Spider-Man series a few years ago at Sony. Thanks to an incompetent director/writing team and studio meddling, they were trying so hard get their franchise bait jammed into their film that they forgot to make a good movie.
They're in such a rush to get that Marvel money, but don't have a solid plan or formula. They have no idea what they're doing/should be doing with this franchise. They are whinging it and boy oh boy does their lack of any concrete direction show.
>>67350100
No one said that, it's just that the movie is made for a specific audience, not the normal public or critics, just DC fans.
>>67349506
Would you say it was just 2deep4u
>Those dastardly movie critics are biased against DC!
>>67350218
>No one said that
see >>67349506
>>67349459
TFA is 8.4 on imdb
>>67350231
More like 2deep4critics
>>67349459
>It's 9.1/10 with 1 billion reviews
>movie still isn't even out yet
Yeah, seems totally legit senpai
>>67350218
Are you really kidding yourself like that? Yeah they totally made a $250 million movie focused on a niche audience, it's definetely good!
>>67350333
I saw it last night. ;)
>>67350338
Tell that to Snyder, it's like he doesn't care about the Critics at all, he just want to make a movie for himself and Fans and knows the movie is going to make money whether people like it or not.
How bad can it be? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMltUXZkPUM , this trailer alone is better than any capeshit released so far, besides Ironman and cap2.
>>67350391
> he just want to make a movie for himself and Fans
It's cute how you're still deluding yourself.
Was TDK not for fans then? That got praised everywhere.
>>67350391
>Once a colony of bats literally lifts Bruce Wayne up in the air as a Christ-like figure, you’re probably watching a movie that takes itself pretty seriously.
#4thefans
I really dont get why the score is so low. It wasnt great nor shit, like most of the Marvel productions.
>>67349506
You haven't even seen the movie what the fuck are you talking about
It's fucking capeshit, who can even take a concept as stupid as Superman seriously
>>67350434
It's not bad, but it's not a masterpiece either. Entertaining imo.
>>67350502
Critics hate Snyder.
>>67349317
It was supposed to be good.
IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE GOOD
FUCKING HELL, WHAT THE FUCK SNYDER
THE FIRST TRAILER WAS FUCKING AWESOME BUT THEN THIS FUCKING HAPPENS
LIFE CANNOT STOP TAKING A HUGE FUCKING SHIT ON ME
>Esdese lost Tatsumi in AgK
>Sakura lost Naruto
>Nintendo halting all Wii U production
>PS4 stlll selling like crack
>Dark Souls 3 confirmed shit
>Batman/Superman confirmed shit
>DC fails at starting up a good CU for the second time
>Patriots won the Super Bowl last year
>Tom Brady got away with cheating AGAIN
>Brussels attack
This is not fucking funny anymore, this isn't fucking fair. Do you hear me God? This isn't funny anymore you fucking asshole. My life has been getting shitnon so much lately, the only thing I wanted was for this movie to be good. Why the fuck did SNYDER get the director role?
Reviewers are paid by Marvel/Disney.
It's no worse than the crap marvel studios puts out but the reviews suggest it's one of the worst things to hit theaters in recent years.
Age of Ultron was fucking garbage, for example, yet that seems to have a 75% fresh rating on RT. Iron Man 2, which is actually one of the worst capeshit movies ever made, has a RT score of 72%!
>>67350587
LMAO @ ur life
>A film that's literally called batman v superman dawn of justice is ACTUALLY really deep and mature and you just don't get it
>>67350630
Ur a cute.
>>67349177
Why would critics want DC to fail? Because they just like Marvel movies? If that were the case, they would just highly rate any capeshit to ensure no negative opinions potentially effect the box office of a movie.
>muh Marvel/DC rivalry
Bad capeshit dilutes the entire genre. Make enough bad ones and people stop going to them, Marvel or DC. See: Westerns.
>>67350391
>>67350218
>fans
Seriously, if you're actually a fan of DC Comics you have more of a reason to be outraged by these movies than anyone.
41%
1
%
>>67350587
Brady supports Trump too
>>67350662
>Make enough bad ones and people stop going to them
Marvel has been trying this for years. Capeshit can't die no matter what.
>>67350686
But like a decent 41
>>67349506
>Here's something different, complex and pessimistic and makes you think a little
From what I can tell, the only thing right about this is that it's pessimistic
How can it make you think a little whenall the conflict of the movie is based around misunderstandings?
>>67350434
Zack Snyder is well known for having the best trailers for his films. Once they have you in the theatre though they don't give a fuck about you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pB3AxenYAyU
Like when you cut watchman like a music video the slow motion doesn't look so out of place.
My question is, who the hell is BvS even made for?
>Too dark and violent to appeal to any children
>Too self-serious to appeal to people who want a popcorn flick
>Too half-baked and all over the place to appeal to people who want a great narrative
>Rated PG-13
I can only come to the conclusion that edgy teens and manchildren can enjoy this for the mindless spectacle it inevitably brings to the table.
It has nothing to offer most movie goers and satisfies only the most base desires in a movie.
>>67349857
>or even a fan of something like Sin City or Watchmen,
Don't both of those have good reviews from the critics though?
>the DCuck meltdown continues
>>67350783
Zack Snyder
>>67349576
>implying if those 37 people said it was great this whole board wouldnt be screaming "RIP Marvel!" even though they didn't see the movie either.
This outcome was inevitable. For Marvel or DC. Just so happens it was DC.
>>67350783
Edgelord fedoratipper teenagers
>>67350630
>this is what DCfags believe
>Mixed
No MoS has mixed reviews.
This is "leaning toward negative"
>>67350822
I think Zack Snyder shouldve become a cinematographer instead of a director. He knows how to frame a shot but when it comes to narrative his movies are held together by bits of string.
The only time he holds up is when he is adapting from a source like 300 or Watchmen.
>>67349506
Daredevil and Jessica Jones are neither lighthearted, quippy, or could be considered Saturday morning cartoons and the critics still like them.
>>67350994
Well, BvS don´t have any interracial couple, so...
>>67350994
Because they have to like them
Can you imagine what Reddit would do to them if a critic disliked a blind man or a SJW? Their career would be over, their liberal arts degree worth nothing more than a barista at starbucks
>>67351039
What? Daredevil doesnt appeal to the SJW crowd, Matt Murdoch can practicslly see and is a straight white male who only hangs out with other white people. In fact they killed off the black first to make the show pure again.
People like Daredevil cause it's good. If he was in a wheelchair maybe.
>>67351110
41.
>>67350590
>9/11 was an inside job
>>67350941
>300 or Watchmen
Both of those films fucking sucked.
>It's le real and mature xD
Marvel is shit too but at the very least they know they are doing capeshit and don't take themselves as seriously, unlike Snyder the great mind of the 21st century by making parallels between Jesus and Superman and having le R-rated version which will probably just have a couple of nude Lois Lane shots
>>67351204
That's your opinion but it's also the best work Snyder has done from a storytelling standpoint.
>>67351210
It's likely 30 extra minutes of Batman killing people. Snyder hinted that it's all violence.
why are there no meme pictures yet with the 40% rotten score?
>>67349177
>I'd like to say it's because the critics want DC to fail
Fantastic 4 also did terrible in rotten tomatoes
I don't think it's a Marvel bias, but people finally realizing that capeshit is just that, capeshit
>>67350686
40% actually.
>>67350587
>nintendrone
Kill urself kid
How this has 40%? They are kidding, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwfUnkBfdZ4
>>67351719
I agree. That score is way too generous.
>>67351039
Jesus fucking Christ. Reddit is just as full of bitter nerds who hate SJWs as /tv/ is, perhaps slightly less so.
It's not marvel so it deserves to fail 2bh
>>67349459
Anyone can rate on imdb
>>67351842
Anyone with a blog can rate on rotten.
>>67351167
40% right now.
I don't fucking understand; it's gotten great reviews everywhere in my country, where capeshit movies generally get mediocre ratings. Do Americans hate fun or something?
>>67350590
>Reviewers are paid by Marvel/Disney.
>>67349177
>I'd like to say it's because the critics want DC to fail
It is. Most of the "unbiased" RT critics are known Marvel shills. The only reason Nolan's Batman movies were received so well was because it was known that they would be stand alone movies. Now that Snyder's been moving in on a rival cinematic universe, it's becoming an all out turf war with the RT hacks showing their true colors.
>>67351924
41.
>>67349421
Throwing a new character in at the last 20 minutes is an indicator that theyre pushing JL too hard. Are you blind or just retarded?
>>67352005
How many fucking times do we have to post the scores for the Nolan Batmans, you ridiculous butthurt little man?
>>67352044
See what? A cheap fanboy excuse?
>>67352090
Can you even read you colossal faggot?
>The only reason Nolan's Batman movies were received so well was because it was known that they would be stand alone movies. Now that Snyder's been moving in on a rival cinematic universe, it's becoming an all out turf war with the RT hacks showing their true colors.
>>67352181
>>67352005
Oh yeah Marvel shills would totally praise DC movies like TDK even without that retarded excuse of "there wasn't a dcu yet so those reviews don't count".
>>67350587
shit life mate. Now back to /v/ fucking nintendrone.
>>67352181
Aryan masterrace here. Just saw this in Borkistan and your imaginative conspiracies are hilariously retarded in light of how bad the movie was. It was a complete mess and the reviews are accurate.
>>67352005
Fucking this. Snyder's consistently been ahead of his time in terms of capeshit.
>>67352245
You should probably go back to that other site 2bh pham. I hear they suck Marvel's cock just as hard as you do :^)
>>67352359
But I don't even like Marvel movies.
>>67352181
Go actually read said reviews for why they thought the Nolans were good and why they thought BvS was bad. No conspiracy necessary.
>>67352005
ooooooooooookay bud :D
>>67349921
This /thread faggots
>>67349527
The thing is, even RT's "fresh" reviews aren't very positive. When a "fresh" review says things like "When it drags...", "Ponderous", or "delivers on its promises...eventually", it's damning with faint praise.
>>67350021
>actual film critics
are you fucking serious?
ITT: People who didn't watch the movie and blindly hate it for no reason other than to be an edgy teen
>>67352581
Yes.
>>67349317
41%
>>67352589
don't forget the paid Marvel shills
>>67352589
Welcome to /tv/.
>>67352615
define a movie critic?
>>67352660
Person who reviews movies for a living.
>>67352589
>>67352647
>>67352651
>Once a colony of bats literally lifts Bruce Wayne up in the air as a Christ-like figure, you’re probably watching a movie that takes itself pretty seriously.
>>67352736
a very deep and accurate description, can't argue with that.
>I HATE THIS MOVIE BECAUSE PEOPLE TOLD ME TO HATE THIS MOVIE
You're all bitches.
>>67352772
this cant be real
>>67349177
Basically clickbait. If a movie is highly controversed (like BvS) critics tend to fuel the fire so people will check out their review.
>>67350590
>Reviewers are paid by Marvel/Disney.
Poor logic. In pay for play schemes, you buy good reviews. In attempting to buy bad reviews, you open yourself up to paid-for bad reviews in turn and then nobody's getting good press. But the funny thing about film reviewers, at least the ones employed by the papers and magazines - can't speak so much for the bloggers, is they tend to be very ethical journalists - they don't even like to have their tickets paid for to attend screenings, let alone receive any sort of compensation from the party they're reviewing. It's the kind of thing that gets you fired and blackballed.
>>67353089
they don't even have to buy them. these critics are a joke. they're good as long as their opinion corresponded with the popular opinion. they have absolutely no taste and have nothing to say.
>>67349506
I'm so sick of this argument. So sick of it.
The Nolan movies were tonally dark and serious, and with the exception of DKR, loved by both critics and audiences.
The issue isn't that BvS tried something different, it's that it tried something different and failed miserably, in the exact same way MoS did.
Virtually no one wants a tonally dark Superman, and now we get it fucking twice. On top of that, they're immediately making The World's Greatest Detective look like a chest pounding retard who gets worked into fighting Supes, and they're forcing a shitload of world building in when they don't realize that if they built to it Marvel style, they'd have been poised to strike with a JL movie post the Infinity War payoff when Marvel would have to start the cycle over again.
Denial and damage control all you want, but if you didn't fucking see this coming from the way that the trailers worked out (as in WB had no fucking clue how to sell this movie) you're an actual moron who is too far up his ass with his own pathetic fanboyism.
honestly, why take Frank Miler's version of the DCU to the screen? That shit worked because it was a short, closed story with context. Everything else he's done was awful. Zack Snyder is too afraid to look dumb with his capeshit, so he further ruins it by going "MUH IM AN ADULT!".
Seriously do not understand why he's envolved.Christopher Nolan, David Ayer, Patty Jenkins, all of these are fine and talented - but they trust the guy with the 3 consecutive flops, hated by the critics and clearly talented only to directed music videos for their biggest project.
Warner deserves to get fucked, imo
>>67353535
hwat is this supposed to mean?
>>67353652
only blindcucks and women review this as shitty
>>67353652
>>67353652
>muh wimin
>>67353423
>Virtually no one wants a tonally dark Superman
Also, note that while Nolan's films were very dark they were still filled with color. And this is important because a movie that is only dark all the time is visually boring and won't engage audiences.
Snyder, however, does not know how to make something that's dark without stripping away all colors and desaturating the picture in an attempt to make it more realistic, because as we all know the only colors that do exist in the real world are black, grey and brown.
So not only was it a mistake to make a dark Superman film, but Snyder was literally the worst person they could have choosen to do that.
>>67349459
imdb is user scores from imdb.
rottentomatoes aggregates critic reviews from other websites/magazines/newspapers.
>>67353739
>has glasses
>as if it's a fashion choice
god I hate you people so much
>>67349421
I thought the Flash steals the show there was the big leak about him being the most powerful thing in this film
It's baffling how TDKRises got its dick absolutely sucked by critics but this didn't. That's what's going to be running through my head after I see this when I'm walking home I just know it.
>>67350550
Fuck off john schnepp and you schmoes knows faggots, the way you fuckers shilled star wars is disgusting
>>67350587
Oh boy, wait until warcraft
Just keep in mind that all of the posters bitching about critics and rotten tomatoes would not be doing so if they were saying nice things about the film. These are the kind of people that would fall in love with their rapist if he said MoS was a good movie.
>>67352005
>the positive reviews are middling
>the negative reviews are also middling
>the public consensus is middling.
>the only people LOVING it are people that are fanboys.
Not shilling man. Its just not good. Look at the average score on RT, not the % of freshness. They're different.
>>67349317
>>67352005
Dont forget bryan simger still secretly upset about returns so is jewing the fuck outra people to fuck dc up
Maybe they shouldn't have casted the zionist whore Gadot as Wonder Woman. Personally I didn't go see it because of her and I'm happy that the movie will flop.
>>67354221
yeah that explains it
>>67354272
Never thought about that actually he could be contributing as a proximity hater
Bet they still hire Snyder back after this shit
>DC will never learn
>>67353852
The glasses of a nu-male are necessary yes, but consider why they're necessary. It's because their genetics are so sub-par their own body is denying them basic senses. They are the weakest humanity has to offer.
>Critics Consensus: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice smothers a potentially powerful story -- and some of America's most iconic superheroes -- in a grim whirlwind of effects-driven action.
I accept it
I don't even think Disney even has to pay anybody to give the movie negative reviews
If you're movie has your main antagonist peeing in a cup, we're not looking at high art here
>>67354070
Because BB and TDK were critical darlings
>>67354250
Gadot was actually fine. Nowhere near the worst aspect of the movie. Triggered neckbeards proven wrong again.
>>67352359
snyder it's your typical hollywood trash that thinks himself as an artist but its in reality just a hack. Just look at his shit tatoos.
>>67354070
Did you actually watch BvS?
>>67354642
ok JEW
>>67352005
Yeah okay. This reads like flat-Earth logic.
So DC is making a 'rival cinematic universe' about 5 years too late since Marvel has been throwing about every movie they can possibly make at us.
The Avengers is already over and most probably agree that Age of Ultron was mediocre. Plus, even if DC is successful, Marvel capeshit will ALWAYS have a massive built-in audience.
It's not like market share where someone buys a can of Coke instead of Pepsi. The two companies offer very different characters, and guess what? You can watch fucking both.
DC Universe being successful just means more great capeshit for everyone. Even better if it's a different tone or approach than Marvel's Disney shit.
I know there is not a chance in hell but I would literally poop my pants laughing if this piece of shit makes less money than Deadpool in total world wide receipts.
israel BTFO
>>67353706
That's actually true.
>>67351948
This movie came out when marvel wasn't a powerhouse
>>67349177
>taking a '''''journalist'''' or '''''critic''''' opinion in account
Download or go to see movies and make your own opinion faggots. Then you can post dank memes/shitpost about it.
Listening to critics is literally a redditor thing
>>67355318
I thoughtSupermanflewBatmaninto the sun or something and died
>>67350587
Also, Disney apparently planning on converting the Tower of Terror on both coasts into a halfassed Guardians of the Galaxy ride.
>>67350057
The Dark Knight starred the Quipper Clown though.
nolan batman didn't have giant CGI monsters or superman
>>67349317
>DaS3 shit
>caring about Naruto
>caring about DC
>seahawksfag
lmaoing@urlife sorry you have shit taste senpai
41%
1
%
>>67352138
I have a question for this thread, since I'm not very familiar with how RT works. That screenshot shows that the average rating of BvS is currently 5.4, which exceeds Daredevil's 5.2, yet the Freshmeter is lower.
I know that's because the Big Number is strictly based on a binary Good/Bad count, so my question is: wouldn't that make the ratings very swingy?
If a movie is a 6.5/10 genuinely, so most of the critics rate it there, it could easily get a 75% like Age of Ultron, even if everyone barely tipped over the Fresh line. If BvS was genuinely a 5.5, it could drop to the 40% it stands at now.
Does RT weight this at all? Do statisticians really think this is the best way to rate the quality of things? Do companies care?
>>67356671
n-no
capekino
>>67355218
Geez, what's Females Age 30-44's problem? Every other category is fairly consistent between men and women.
saw the movie. just felt wierd and awkward. pacing and editing was terrible. eisenberg was horrible. other then that the movie itself wasnt terrible but just had too much negative shit for it to be considered good nevermind great.
>>67357375
that's when all the sluts get busted used up and realize without their looks they ain't shit
>>67357497
explain the flash message scene in detail
>>67349344
>People never ever think something will fail and want it to, and when they see it they still think it sucks just so they can think they were right.
It's literally what /tv/ does, you think nobody else does it?
>>67355318
Bro, we knew this a year ago. Not news.
>>67357293
It's almost a done deal for DCA, which is getting it because they want to plant the seeds for a future Marvel Land at a low cost because the current head of the Parks division is some guy named Bob Chapek from Consumer Products that invented the Disney Vault marketing scheme that really wants Marvel stuff ASAP, but is unwilling to put Star Wars Land-level money behind it because between the expense of those projects and the money sink that has been building Shanghai (which has had tons of construction issues and delays. Like it's all hands on deck now just to get it finished with American parks getting tons of budget cuts), they can't do the full plan yet (which also would involve a Cap coaster)
It became a bicoastal thing because doing these things in pairs is cheaper and Guardians is the only MCU film Disney can even use in Florida. But Disney World's management is super stingy with money, plus with all the work going on in Hollywood Studios, they can't really afford to have Tower of Terror down for several months to put this shit in and the head of WDW's insisting on a simpler and cheaper temporary overlay if it goes in at all.
Guy who leaked this information has very good sources and previously leaked the whole "Diagon Alley at Universal with a train connecting the two parks" and other stuff, so this is a serious thing that's being considered.
>critics want DC to fail
Dude, DC wants DC to fail.
>>67357570
bruce is sleeping in his cave and the flash just shows up in a vortex of light and electricity trying to give bruce a message that you can hardly hear. meanwhile bruce is being blinded and blasted back by the vortex the whole time untill it just dissapears and he wakes up sitting in the same chair as the dream where he had fallen asleep.
>>67349177
DC being sold to Marvel when?
>>67353535
If you read the fresh ratings, you'll see that they still shit a lot on it
http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/batman-v-superman-is-v-bad-1766555948
Some excerpts:
>Holly plays Senator Finch (a Democrat from Kentucky, which is the least believable thing in the film), doing the only thing Senators do in superhero movies, and honestly, her dialogue in Raising Arizona was less absurd. “I grew up on a farm—I know how to wrestle a pig,” is one thing she says; “Take a bucket of warm piss and call it Granny’s Peach Tea” is, incredibly, another. (That one gets a callback.) I would describe her demeanor as she says these things as serenely bemused. Likewise Jeremy Irons as Alfred, who mostly just drinks and sighs, which I suppose makes him the audience surrogate, content in the fact that at least he doesn’t have any scenes with Lex Luthor.
>Lois Lane says stuff like, “I’m not a lady, I’m a journalist” and has stuff said to her like, “[In the men’s bathroom] You know, with balls like this, you belong in here.”
>Oof, Lex Luthor is a drag. Jesse Eisenberg preens and over-enunciates and waxes crazily pedantic, like no one told him he’s not in a Sorkin movie anymore; his method of conveying Brilliant Insanity is to make as though he just ingested touring funk band quantities of cocaine.
Do you pee? You will.
>>67358064
>every line intoned with Desdemonian gravitas, every falling bullet casing memorialized with its own slow-mo funereal aria. (At one point, the Army fires a big-ass cannon, and that shell also falls to the ground in super-slow motion.)
>(At one point, the Army fires a big-ass cannon, and that shell also falls to the ground in super-slow motion.)
>that shell also falls to the ground in super-slow motion
>>67358064
>linking Gawker clickbait
>>67349963
how is Alfred
>>67357375
They're unsuccessfully coping with their dead uterus and dried out eggs and realizing they were pumped and dumped for years for nothing.
Why are Marvel movies so much more fun bros?
>>67358819
Better characters and a better company than DC.
>>67349177
It struggles on being a stand alone movie. Instead its more focused on setting up JL.
anyone not gonna see it now that the reviews are in? i didn't like man of steel but i thought this would at least get 70% because of batman.
ill probably just watch a cam
Why the FUCK does Batman kill people en masse? I'm not even opposed to Batman killing people on occasion, but from what it sounds like he just flat out murders scores of people with miniguns.
and I was thinking there'd be an interesting moral quandary where Batman had to break his one rule because the potential threat of Superman outweighed any sense of personal morality. From what it sounds like, Batman's killing of people isn't even presented as something outlandish, something caused by the stress and despair he's in. Alfred, who's questioning Batman throughout the movie, doesn't even care that Batman is murdering people left and right.
tl;dr Snyder is a Hack who doesn't understand any of these characters
>>67349177
>that sad superman the whole film, feels superman.
>that lex
>that capitol scene from emotion to opposite emotion
>that final fight
>that score
>the film is literally an answer to man steel haters
>that perfect batman and bruce wayne
>that metropolis intro
this is what I call a film.
>>67358819
because being fun is the point of marvel movies.
they know they're not making high art, and they embrace that, instead of trying to redefine what superheroes can be.
It's because Marvel poisoned the well with their jokes and quips.
Look at this shit:
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/batman-v-superman-dawn-of-justice/critic-reviews?dist=neutral
Literally nothing but complaining about how "it's too dark!", "it's too serious!", "what about the children!", whine whine whine
What's worse is that now Marvel is going to double down on the terrible quips, lame villains, and grating family friendliness.
>>67359518
>WAHHH WHY CANT THE WORLD BE EDGY LIKE ME? IM HARDCORE
kek
>>67359518
>>67359518
Yes, yes, it's Marvel's fault. Their quips and family friendliness aren't as sophisticated as your patrician pee jokes.
>>67359208
>that furious denial
>that sound of angry tears hitting the keyboard
Maybe we should pray?
>>67351152
Yeah, let's ignore all the interracial shit going on. I wonder who could be behind this post. Retarded fanboy.
![lgbt-rainbow-flag[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/RKOoHoy.jpg "lgbt-rainbow-flag[1].jpg")
>>67361264
>He wouldn't bleach Rosario Dawson.
Well I know who's behind YOUR post.
>>67349177
>>2016
>>Caring what critics and reviewers think
I hope you guys don't do this.
>>67362327
>>67349506
>everyone attacking this anon when he's almost quoting the critics verbatim
>>67349931
>>67350785
Do you guys even think before you speak? He's comparing them content wise, not critical reception.
>>67362402
>Dat lack of emotion
>>67358064
>Do you pee? You will.
fuckin kek
>>67350162
About the only other thing to add is that the original plan was to have the Green Lantern movie start the DC Cinematic Universe. When that movie tanked they decided that Man of Steel would be the start instead.
>>67359669
>>67360180
>implying you guys aren't jaded bitter losers on a vietnamese knitting bbs
>>67349177
>Casts Jessie Eisenberg as Lex fucking Luthor
>People are surprised it sucks
wasn't it obvious from the get go?
A lot of the journalist reviewing it with negative scores are but hurt over not being invited to the press screening over the weekend. Also Devon faraci is a hack who just wrote a piece about how he is biased towards marvel... So go figure
>>67362333
Why not? Plebs like you usually spam their scores of its positive
Is it just me or does the new Superman movie rox my sox?
>>67349177
mixed
the reviews aren't mixed
the reviews are negative
Why do you think?
>>67359518
Daredevil
>Batman being lifted by Bats
>Batman straight up murdering people
>Needless slow motion establishing shots or shallow Depth of Field
>Dream sequence to build muh DCCU that is jarring as fuck when it appears but some chucklefuck comic reader will squeal about it cuz muh fanboys
>M-martha
>Lois lane exposition dispenser
>Ending that just keeps needlessly going, least we know how Luthor gets bald in this universe.
There's more crap shit was bad senpai. You think Iron Man 2 was filled with world building bloat, BvS is so bloated it's starting to produce a gravitational orbit.
>>67363361
Your forgot Lex' Jar of Piss
>>67363057
>and almost entirely humorless
This is a bad sign, even for normies.
Snyder you fucking fedoratipper hack.
>>67351842
this.
dont let the critic intelligentsia tell you what to think, vote trump
if superman dies how does he come back in the sequel?
>>67363990
The stinger is literally his grave beginning to move
In the original story where Doomsday killed him he wasn't really dead he was just so close to dead humans examining him couldn't tell he was alive and he was slowly healing.
>>67363990
he going to be replaced by supermans twin brother who had amnesia until he saw footage of his brother dying on tv
>>67363990
He gets better.
>>67349833
/tv/ actively wants this to fail cause it will deal a blow to capeshit as a genre
>>67350941
Those were good cause they had good scripts a directer can't magic a scriot better especially when he is on a time table
>>67349421
Isn't there a big flash forward to Darkseid?
>>67363990
theyll pull a Star Trek.
>Justice League: The Search for Superman
>>67364253
I actually want it to fail because it's the only chance at stopping Snyder from ruining all DC characters
>>67362359
>tfw your son is just a torso
>>67363361
>>Batman straight up murdering people
?
>>67364485
batman viciously kills people in the movie
superior
I heard that Batman kills in this movie.
Can someone please tell me if that's true?
>>67364506
Didn't see any of that?
>>67364573
go to /co/
>>67364548
He "kills" in the same way he does in most Batman media
Ie, he beats people to within an inch of their life, blows shit up, and it's all justified because "I don't have to save you"
>>67364485
Yupp. They fucked up Batman. Killing people left and right not giving a fuck
>>67364613
I didn't see him "viciously kill people" in the film. Have you even seen it?
>>67364619
>"I don't have to save you"
he also uses guns
>>67364698
He uses heavy artillery against heavy artillery
Did you even pay attention?
>>67364459
Based nigga
>>67364459
In what world is "turns into a Zack Snyder movie" not a negative?
>>67362327
better than anything that shitty CW show has done
