AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Boy those Latin people sure are hot blooded.
Trusting a mexican with the bad review but not with the good ones
TOP KEK
>>67313923
>[Full review in Spanish]
BUILD
U
I
L
D
WALL
A
L
L
>>67313967
More like half-blooded.
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/batman_v_superman_dawn_of_justice/reviews/
It doesn't show anything here, but it says (1).
>says it's a big letdown in every sense
>give's it a 6/10
fucking mexishits needs to be executed
>>67313923
IT'S OVER
DC IS FINISHED
>>67314011
>6/10
>rotten
RT, I...
>>67313923
>Original Score: 6/10
>rotten
bravo rt
>>67313923
ITS OVER. Marvel WINS
>>67313923
>spic
opinion discarded
BLOWN THE FUCK OUT
>>67313923
>spanish
This is a movie only free people can understand
>>67314108
>>67314121
the only time they likely get any traffic is when a big name movie gets a bad review
they probably do it for the ad revenue from this shithole
DC KEKS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>67313989
Are all BvS fans Trump supporters?
I guess I'll have to assume they are.
>>67313979
>>67313989
>>67314058
>>67314144
>>67314171
DCucks is full damage control mode and its only the first review.
>>67314171
>>67314144
>>67314058
>>67313990
>>67313989
Fuck off /pol/
>>67313923
It's no "glib facsimile" but it's good enough tbqh
>>67314196
I wonder if they'll start sending him death threats like they did after that Batman movie that forced RT to completely reformat their site.
>>67314196
>>67314214
>unironically defending mexicans just to have a shot at a movie you don't agree with
give it time, you'll have plenty of reasons to point and laugh once we all see the movie
>>67314219
BIG
I
G
LET
E
T
DOWN
O
W
N
>>67314058
>>67314108
>>67314121
>Amerifats think 6 out of 10 is a passing grade
>>67314251
it's from chile
>inb4 they're all the same
again, fuck off /pol/
>>67313923
>pottery
Why are you faggots shilling so hard for this movie?
God I swear company allegiance and "muh patrician taste" is sone cancerous shit.
That said. Looking forward to it.
>>67314196
I find it hard to belive that this movie has no redeeming qualities and this beaner says it's a big letdown in every way.
HOW CAN MARVEL EVEN COMPETE?
Clearly this is wrong, mexicans can't understand true kino and Snyder's outstanding talent.
>batman me la pela
What did he mean by this?
How many reviews are necessary before they give the movie a 0% score?
The critic hated Batman v Superman for not being as "realistic" and good as Man of fucking Steel.
DC just can't win, man.
Im all for laughing at BvS, but if the guy says its a let down in every way and then gives it 6/10, its clear he is retarded.
KINO
I
N
O
Ignore these RT scores, only true patricians will be able to understand and appreciate this movie. We know this since Man of Steel.
>>67314332
How about getting a good director again?
>>67314332
terrifying
>>67314332
>steel man
>>67314307
>cocky "better than thou" piece of shit Superman
>paranoid bat man
>Luthor played by that kike Eisenberg
>gave irrational man 7/10 and risen 7.5/10
>this gets 6/10
wew lad, if those pieces of shit were passable, then BvS truly is worse than shit
>>67314365
Translation issue, no doubt.
>>67314345
>Im all for laughing at BvS, but if the guy says its a let down in every way and then gives it 6/10, its clear he is retarded.
He basically says that the movie will divide audiences and that it will probably be enjoyable for people who just want mindless capeshit fantasy action.
I find it hilarious that /tv/ thinks that the movie will get a high RT score considering Snyder's mediocre track record.
>>67314332
Sounds more like he's taking them to task because they can't get their shit together and pick one or the other.
>>67314345
You can still judge a movie quality wise, AND dislike it.
>alot of people say the movie is good
>paid shills
>some random mexican says it's bad
>people actually take his word for it
DC CANNOT WIN, IT'S OVER
how can people get hyped for this
like seriously
capeshit is so dime-a-dozen
if this one is bad, theres another one coming out in a month
>>67314406
I find it hilarious that people use that website in the first place.
HOW YOU WANT YOUR DC MOVIE VERSE SENPAI
>>67314332
That's the problem with all of DC.
Half of its' heroes are Gods and the other half are athletic humans.
You just can't take Batman seriously when he's fighting Superman, WW and Doomsday. It's Mary Sue writing to the max.
>>67313967
>>67313979
>>67313989
>>67314058
>>67314108
>>67314121
>>67314144
>>67314171
>>67314219
>>67314345
>>67314347
Ahhh.
Ba dump.
Ba dump!
BA DUMP!
I can hear those hearts beating away in pathetic shame.
Hands shaking.
Palms sweating!
Never thought I'd have reason to break out the Glib folder again
>>67314365
In Spanish 'Man of Steel' translates as 'El hombre de acero' but Google then translates that as 'Steel Man'.
>>67314332
well if someone for some reason likes MoS because it's realistic, they'll probably see the sequel, and if it's a different tone, they'll be disappointed
>>67314418
Not what he does though. He is clearly one of the crowd who says UTTER SHIT 5/10! and PRETTY GOOD 9,5/10!
>>67314435
>it's 2016
>still being a salty DCuck
>>67314447
JUST BATMAN MY SHIT UP
>>67314453
>reading
you failed
>>67314287
>not being able to tell a bait review from a real one
>>67313979
>>67313989
>>67314058
>>67314108
>>67314121
>>67314144
>>67314171
>>67314181
>>67314332
>>67314347
CAPESHITTERS ON SUICIDE WATCH
JUST WAIT UNTIL DRUMPF LOSES TOO
>Pleb doesn't like it
PERFECT
>>67314345
I don't see how that's a problem. A 6 isn't really good. It's basically Man of Steel all over and that let a ton of people down.
>this is the reviewer that marvel drones trust
he also gave star wars a 9.5/10
Also this.
This guy gave Room a 5.5/10 and London has Fallen a 7.5/10, his opinion is discarded
I'm enjoying /tv/'s inability to read and understand a review.
>>67314534
I guess that's bad since SW:FA was a 10/10 movie.
>>67314534
>Being mad because there are people who aren't sheeple
BvsS CONFIRMED WORSE THAN DIRTY GRANDPA
LAMO DKEKS JUST LMAO
>Gave London has Fallen a 7/10
>Gave Zoolander 2 a 8.5/10
>Gave Room a 5.5/10
>>67314534
>>67314544
FULL DAMAGE CONTROL
>>67314536
its like poetry
>>67314417
He thought Man of Steel was a intelligent masterpiece and that BvS is just pure spectacle.
Why do people even listen to critics and sites like RT and IMDb? They're not even accurate most of the time. And if you see that a movie got shit reviews and then go to see it, you're going to expect it to be shit and think that it's shit the whole time.
Not that I'm a DC cuck, just saying that people should be the judge on their own sometimes.
>>67314534
As I said, this guy only has 5/10 - 10/10 scale
>>67314481
>thinking people outside /co/ and /v/ and that other website care about which company makes the comics over the other company which makes the comics
>still saying cluck like it means something
>being a shill for rotten tomatoes, likely for free
>being a low quality shitposter
>caring about rt scores
>stealing oxygen from productive members of society
>>67314478
He doesn't say it's utter shit, just that it's a let down in every way.
That's not contradictory with a 6/10. If you're a D student, you average 6 out of 10, and you're still a let down in every way.
>>67314582
No but seriously, you should look at this guy's ratings, they're pretty hilarious
>>67314479
Underrated post IMO
>>67314544
>London Has Fallen or: How I learned to stop being PC and killed the Saracens
>7.5/10
You're right, it should be higher. What a pleb.
>>67314589
"Those who liked MoS will be disappointed" =/= "I found MoS to be an intelligent masterpiece."
>>67314601
>bothering to watch, or write reviews for literal 4/10 or lower movies
kek
>>67314598
RT is just a survey, if half the people say they didn't enjoyed the movie then it's more probable that you will think the same than a movie that gets a perfect score.
NO ITS NOT FAIR THIS WAS OUR TIME TO SHINE
WHY DO PEOPLE ONLY LIKE MARVEL FLICKS
>>67314582
I don't give a shit about capeshit just wanted to show you guys how these reviewers are mostly wrong
>>67314647
Read the review.
>>67314544
That's pretty much what I thought about those two. I guess BvS is gonna be bad.
>>67314613
I cannot wait for the upcoming single digit score so I can see more of your whining and shitposting.
>>67314630
>I'm 14 and care about capeshit
>>67314648
what are 4/10 or lower movies though?
>>67314663
>>67314663
Post the full translation. Specifically the part where he calls MoS an "intelligent masterpiece."
>>67313923
IT'S OVER! BASED SPICS HAVE DESTROYED CAPESHIT!
>>67314544
Sounds about right.
DC is finished
>>67314655
It doesn't matter how good batman v superman is. If it doesn't have the marvel logo on the poster, it's bad. Face it , we live in the marvel era
>>67314601
he gave the new divergent movie a 3.5/10, which is totally on point, he also gave the fifth wave the same grade
MÉXICO DELIVERED THE FIRST HIT
NOW CHILE IS GOING FOR THE FINISHING BLOW
CAPESHIT ON ITS DEATH BED
>>67314273
You are right.
Chilenos are worse.
>>67314669
If you really thought room was worse then London has Fallen than I feel sorry for you
>>67314714
He must have felt sick for a whole after watching it
>>67314683
I made no mention of capeshit you Muslim cocksucker.
>>67314676
You can wait or not wait for anything you like. Rotten Tomatoes scores mean nothing to me. If you have trouble with that concept, imagine how girls feel about you when you walk into the cafeteria at lunch.
I'm going to see this movie and probably enjoy it for what it is, but I actually hope it gets shitty reviews just because DC shills are unbearable fucktards.
They actually think DC movies are "patrician and intelligent unlike le Marvel xD", acting like they aren't both just mindless pleb entertainment action movies.
>>67314704
>it doesn't matter if a movie is good or bad
>people only like it if it's Marvel
Wow, the levels of butthurt are extraordinary
DC FILMS ARE FOR AMERICANS, WAIT TILL AMERICA EMBARGO LIFTS
>>67314630
>>67314669
>>67314698
This is what capeshit has done to us fucking disgusting
>>67314743
I didn't actually watch Room. Nothing fappable in it.
>>67314704
Normies don't care about logos.
They care about entertainment.
DC can't catch up as desperately as they try. You just can't cram everything into one film and call it a day.
Should have been
>Man of Steel 2 feat: Batman
or
>Batman: Yes we're rebooting again, can you believe it?
DC going bankrupt confirmed
>>67314743
>>67314780
Room was exploitative misery porn.
>>67314746
you're right, for me the new divergent was a solid 0/10, everything about it was awful
>>67313923
Reminder the first few Deadpool reviews were positive. It's now practically guaranteed that Batman v Superman will get a RT score that's below 80%. DCucks will never catch a break.
>>67314649
But most people are idiots who wouldn't know a good movie if it hit them in the face.
>>67314751
Yes you do that's why you made your troll "lmao xD" comment you fucking liar.
>>67314770
The fact that Man of Steel is rated lower than the worst/forgetable marvel movies proves my point.
The marvel audiance will eat anything up .
>>67314834
Man of Steel is legitimate shit though.
>>67314785
Nice b8 faggot go watch actual films ok
>>67314834
Man of Steel rates lower because it's a bad movie.
Marvel movies, on the other hand, are good.
I'm not expecting you to confess that, but it's the explanation as to why you go through life so confused.
>>67314822
It's okay, they'll have WW with a 100% RT score. Critics are too afraid of being labelled sexists for disliking it.
>>67314762
>I actually hope it gets shitty reviews just because DC shills are unbearable fucktards.
This is exactly how I feel. MCUcks are annoying but they aren't anywhere near as pretentious as DCucks.
I hope the second review is rotten aswell, just for the sake of entertainment. The rest can be possitive for all I care.
>>67314811
Saying it was worse then London has Fallen is absolutely wrong though
>1 review
>all this "BTFO DKEKS ON SUICIDE WATCH"
it's the memes
>>67314853
The reviewer think it's great.
>>67314251
The funny thing is that latinos are the most shillingmovie audience in the whole fucking world, if they dont like this movie then that spells catastrophe for the USA movie critics
>>67313923
poco fanboy de marvel el tipo este jkajajaja
>>67314853
>>67314864
If you two think that MOS is worse than Iron man 2/3 , Thor 2, Cap 1 and week of ultron ,then you successfully baited me
>>67314886
This happens for every movie capeshit tourist
wait until the number for percent show up
these retards will spam every up and down
>>67314058
6/10 essentially means, "Yeah I saw it, but honestly don't remember much because I was bored out of my mind"
>>67314891
Where does he say that? The only thing I see is him saying that fans of MoS will be disappointed.
>>67314910
Cap 1 >>>>>> MoS
MoS is better than the other ones you listed though.
>>67314910
Those movies were better than MoS, yes. Audiences and critics agree.
I'm sorry you've got shit taste and don't understand why.
>ITT: 16 year olds trying to bait each other over capeshit
>>67313923
>[Translated]
>Due to the pressure that meant watching all of the MCU movies destroy the worldwide box office, Warner Bros. decided it was time to face the competition and start its own series of interconnected movies.
>JUST that instead of making movies for each character that end in a joint feature, the studio preferred that the Man of Steel sequel introduced other DC Comcs superheroes such as Batman and Wonder Woman and also worked as a prequel to Justice League.
>[...] The first mistake of the movie is involving Geoff Johns, DC Comics creative director in the role of executive producer. It's evident that Warner Bros, due to the mixed reception to Man of Steel, recurred to him to make their film universe full of comic book sensibilities that satisfied the fans not happy with the Superman reboot. But by doing that, the studio didnt noticed that something that works in the comic book panels does not necessariliy works in live-action movies.
>BvS is full of narrative gratitude thought with the sole purpose of competing with Marvel. The characters exposition is lacking and the only interest is rapidly setting the ground to the eventual release of the first part of Justice League in 2017.
>While Man of Steel is a movie preoccupied with keeping itself in a realistic sci-fi, this sequel is permissive in every chance it has. It's a true shame, moreso considering that Superman is the center of different arcs that if developed correctly would be a great continuation of those in the movie the preceeds it.
>[...] Batman v Superman is a missed opportunity that will also divide the public. It surely be loved by those that only hope to see the most faithful comic book fantasy while those that apreciated the realistic tone of Man of Steel will find it as a complete disappointment.
>>67314121
Well, to be fair the review is really negative and he has barely any good things to say about it, the 6/10 score at the end of the review seems a bit baffling after reading the rest of the review.
>>67314906
Man those comments... We should carpet bomb South America.
>>67314910
I once watched my autistic 9 year old cousin play minecraft for a couple of hours. That was better than MoS
>>67314902
kinda, chinese are worst, they just want to see explosions and robots
>>67314941
>if you liked MoS you'll dislike BvS
I'm OK with that I'll go see it and probably enjoy it
>>67314872
Sad but true. Supergirl is the worst modern capeshit show and it has a fucking 97%. There's no doubt critics will go easy on Wonder Woman unless it's a Batman & Robin level mess.
>>67314999
>Supergirl has 97%
>Daredevil S2 has 75%
You can't make this shit up.
>>67314974
But that guy from EW said that if you didn't like MoS then BvS was probably not for you
I guess they will piss off both publics
>>67314144
>>67314171
>Mexico is Spain
illiterate burgers
>>67314902
This, almost every latino review I've ever seen on RT has been extremely positive. Latino critics are far less critical than American critics.
>>67315014
I've been hearing a lot of the opposite I don't know if their shills but we'll see
6/10 pretty much means it's a 16/10 to be honest
>10/10 for pure kino
>-10 because he is too plebe to appreciate it
>6 because even a pleb got something out of it
>10-10+6
>Ignore the -10 if you are a patrician
>10+6 =16/10
>>67315015
who said mexican? speak english fucker.
>>67314891
AND he thinks BvS is worse, so BvS is WORSE than literal shit.
>>67315025
yes, they even eat all those direct to dvd movies that for some reason get theatrical release in their countries.
>Marvelfaggs placing all their hopes and dreams with Mexican reviewers
How the mighty have fallen
DELETE THIS
E
L
E
T
E THIS
I've never seen marvel fags so ready for their defeat.
6 pm EST is coming
>>67314448
By the same logic, Iron Man shouldn't be taken seriously fighting enemies with super powers. After all, the only thing he has is power armor and Batman has that in BvS in addition to all his gadgets, vehicles, etc.
>>67314953
He says it's a letdown, so if you have zero expectations it's probably an okay time waster, but it could've/should've been so much better.
>>67315075
>Chile is Mexico
I want /pol/ to leave
>>67313989
Fuck off trump
>>67314886
Newfag
>>67315080
>all critics 1
>rotten 1
>>67314941
>The first mistake of the movie is involving Geoff Johns, DC Comics creative director in the role of executive producer. It's evident that Warner Bros, due to the mixed reception to Man of Steel, recurred to him to make their film universe full of comic book sensibilities that satisfied the fans not happy with the Superman reboot. But by doing that, the studio didnt noticed that something that works in the comic book panels does not necessariliy works in live-action movies.
I knew this would happen. The general public won't understand shit from those dream sequences. And all the "comic panels homage" won't mean shit for them.
>>67315102
i had zero expectations for man of steel and i still thought it was shit and nearly left the cinema after STOP MY INVINCIBLE SON
like i know its capeshit but that movie felt like a constant assault on my brain
>>67315080
JUST
https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/text/stormblr%20/filename/1/
https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/text/%2Fpol%2Fkold/filename/1/
>>67315008
Shit like that shows you should never be too trusting of critics. Daredevil is better than Supergirl in every single way but Supergirl got far more positive reviews because the protagonist is a woman.
>All batman v superman reviews are great so far
>T-this is the only review that counts!!
>>67315177
>>67315133
JUUUUUUUSt
>>67313923
DELETE THIS
>>67315177
>being this upsetchecked
>>67315133
>>67315188
Cringe
>>67315203
why would you cringe at dubs, family?
>>67315203
I agree
That's why I posted it
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/filename/1/
>>67315177
>all BvS pre-embargo STUPID TWITTER REACTIONS are positive
>first post-embargo review is negative
>>67313923
>full review in Spanish
HAHAHAHAHA FUCK OFF
>>67315177
>>All batman v superman reviews are great so far
Only one professional review has been released. The positive "reviews" you're referring to are tweets that were written by DC super fans.
>>67315080
how many more hours?
>>67315177
Its the only one on RT. Shill harder.
>>67315177
>implying tweets are reviews
What about this movie makes people try so hard?
>>67315133
>>67315233
Was it autism?
>>67314629
Badman v Superflop: Dawn of JUST
>>67315282
people just don't want the DC cinematic universe to fail
>>67315177
>believing botnets paid for by DC that also shill for ISIS
fuck off
>>67315291
You seem upset
and caught
>>67314534
If I thought TFA was bad and he gave it a 9.5, then by that logic Dawn of Just must be really really bad.
>>67314219
dumb ghettoposter
>>67315080
DC KEK IN DAMAGE CONTROL, must be your IP or blind fandom not seeing it
>>67315315
Yeah but I don't get it. People are acting like its the new ghostbusters or something
>>67315363
>that fucking botnet
LAAAAD
Rotten tomatoes is for no-taste faggot normies
>>67315125
Oh for fucksake. Johns is involved in this? Why would they do that?
>>67315364
Eh there's so much betting on this movie so I can see why people would get excited
>>67315450
I don't know anything about Geoff Johns. Is he a hack?
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/critic/uriel-barco/
>deadpool
>8/10
>Jew Wars: blacked awakens
>9.5/10
>>67313923
DCucks on suicide watch
>>67315505
>Batman v Superman is apparently worse than Memepool and Jew Wars
DC IS FINISHED!
Scruffy just gave it a 1.3/10... Lowest score he's ever given. Goddamn. Fucking Catwoman had 3.5/10.
>>67315560
Source.
>Advice for Zach: just give up. Just give up.
>1.3/10
>>67314264
Meanwhile in europe...
>>67315583
JUST
My theater only has the film in IMAX-3D (not IMAX 2D), 4D and 2D. How do I see the capeshit?
>>67315583
IT'S
O
V
E
R
>>67315583
People like this would've said that no matter what. A large majority intended on negatively reviewing the film months before they even saw it.
>>67315603
You go see Knight of Cups instead.
>>67315583
Hahhahahahhahahahahahhaha
>>67315583
People actually belive this is real
>>67315583
Is this fake? Not showing here
>>67315620
sounds tiny bit paranoid famalam
>>67315603
FOUR DEE???
>>67315598
>taking that a C grade is an accomplishment you would want to brag home about
oh i forgot you had an elected president with those scores, look how well that turned out
>>67315583
In the future use some other font , but nice bait
I'll never understand why you fags base so much of your opinions on critic reviews. Is it because you're young and easily influenced?
A lot of the times the reviews are correct, I won't deny that, but there's many movies that I consider great that have low scores on RT. Likewise, I've seen movies that are insanely boring or flat-out cringeworthy that have 90% or more positive reviews.
As you get older, one thing you start to understand about movies, or any kind of art form or entertainment, is that the opinion of the masses is not always the best opinion. Sometimes they're all looking in one direction when they're supposed to be looking in another. Sometimes they're not completely honest with their opinion. Sometimes they don't care and just need to get a review out.
The point is - reviews are all subjective and are influenced by a thousand different variables. If you base your opinions of a piece of entertainment on the opinions of others, you have no real personal taste. If you agree that all movies that have a high RT percentage are good, and all that have a low percentage are bad, your don't have "good taste", you have manufactured taste and manufactured opinions, which might as well be no taste and no opinion.
wew
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/critic/oscar-uriel/
>>67315727
BARCO??
>>67315711
I don't think anyone here takes RT seriously , people mention it because it triggers people to write walls of texts like you
>>67315757
Pretty much this, at least on /tv/
>>67315685
An A is 80 percent. A literal B- is an A. Explain that.
>>67315750
>had to change his review because he was getting death threats
>didn't even make it positive
holy shit, is DC fucking done?
>>67315757
>I don't think anyone here takes RT seriously
>Specifically, when there is a low score for a movie I really, really like
>>67315750
HAHAHAAH
>>67315711
Watching the reception a movie gets is fun (specially if it looked like it was gonna be a train wreck). Of course you should form your own opinion. Too see where you agree and disagree. I see reviews and just mere discussions not just evaluations. I do think though considering receptions of films is worth time when looking at the big picture of the industry.
>>67314536
But it's 'hierro' what should translate into 'iron'.
What the fuck, Google?
>>67315488
The biggest. The fact that they would use him when they've got Grant Morrison there is unbelievable.
>>67313923
IT'S OVER
>>67315806
>Furryfag
>Think he has an opinion
>>67313923
>gave The Force Awakens a 9.5/10
>>67315450
Johns is also writing the solo Batman movie for Affleck if you can believe it.
That's like Marvel letting Bendis write Infinity War.
>>67315603
Avoid the 4D, it's not worth it, go Imax or normal 2D
Does this mean they fixed what Man of Murder did wrong?
Will the ending feel like the superheroes saved the day rather than just waiting for the national guard to come and pick up the bodies under the debris?
>>67315844
Fuck off retard, i bet youre excited for Wonder Woman: Earth One BLACKED Edition
It's over, we lost DCbros. Time to commit sudoku.
>>67315957
Johns' Wonder Woman is even shittier
>inb4 not anymore
It has improved but it's still shit and she's boring asf now
And he is even more involved with her movie.
>>67315757
>illiterate nigger detected
You call that a wall of text? kek
>>67315977
This is normally when I talk about how DC still has animated movies which are still really strong, but I just saw Justice League War yesterday. I'm so sorry, brother.
>>67315750
>Oscar Uriel
I had no idea he was in Rotten Tomatoes, he's a based critic.
So basically this confirms BvS is a bad film?
>>67315757
>I don't think anyone here takes RT seriously
And you would be incorrect.
>>67315873
TFA maybe cliche. rehash and whatever you call it, but it's not a bad film.
>>67315957
No Wonder Woman will be dogshit just like the last decade of Johns' output.
>>67314479
>>67315044
This is what kino looks like, fucking kill yourself.
>>67315977
I enjoyed Man of Steel, and I'm going to love this movie. Speak for yourself, I haven't lost anything.
>>67316070
Reminder that Johns had a lot of input on Green Lantern and he defends that piece of shit
>>67316059
Never said it was bad. But it sure in the fuck isn't a 9.5/10 movie.
>>67314347
>it'll be good no matter what
>>67316035
>Oscar Uriel
No, it just confirms some Mexican critic literally only you have heard of doesn't like it.
IT'S NOT FUCKING FAIR
>>67316117
He even did the commentary on the DVD instead of the director of the movie. Most of it was him hyping up his own GL run.
Has there every been a movie more viralled than BvS?
>>67316164
You mean ANOTHER critic in a roll doesn't like it
>>67316164
>literally only you have heard of doesn't like it.
Me and every kid watching movies in "Canal 5" during 90s
>>67316035
>http://www.rottentomatoes.com/critic/oscar-uriel/
any reviewer who hated the martian is okay in my book
>>67315750
>http://www.rottentomatoes.com/critic/oscar-uriel/
the guy gave Age of Ultron 75%
Dropped
Where the fuck are there other reviews?
>>67316173
It's over for us, DCbro
>>67316238
At your mom's house.
>>67316229
fuck off /pol/
>>67316238
Embargo lifts at 3pm PST
>>67316203
>thinks Mexishit critics matter
I got some bad news for you, son.
>>67316104
>your ability to brag that it had high scores and reviewed well
>your ability to tell marvelited that they are BTFO
>your dignity and self respect by posting your love for man of steel
no sir you lost more than you think
