RATEAN ADDAN DISCUSSAN
What will you watch tonite?
Kino
yi yi probabli
http://letterboxd.com/kelps/
>>67271376
How lewd was Y Tu Mama
Should I watch Le ravageur or Le enfant problematique deux ?
>>67271388
neither. watch this
What's a good media player for linux aside from vlc?
>>67271464
mpv
>>67271503
Thanks.
>>67271464
Plex with mpv
>>67271562
Does Plex transcode video?
http://letterboxd.com/Synt/
how was everyone's weekend?
>>67271590
There's option for it.
>>67271705
But not automatically.
>>67272026
I'm not sure as I ran to advanced setup the first I installed it and made sure it won't fuck with the video as I got bandwith more than enough in my house to stream full bluray over the net here.
There's options for both video and audio transcode, check it out yourself.
>>67272069
I only stream to my tv, and I was concerned the video was being transcoded. That would suck. Overall good program/app.
>>67271384
very but I'm wondering if it's normal for mexican kids to fap with eachother
http://letterboxd.com/AlphaPapa/
Follow me
>>67271691
what did you think of mod fuck explosion? obviously liked i!
>>67271562
>not using the far better Kodi.
b a m p
>>67271094
MoonMan
>>67274825
nhno
http://letterboxd.com/Sand/
I feel like I immediately need to see Ashes of Time again.
https://letterboxd.com/creamy/
It's Patrician Time.
Creamy.
>>67275887
more like cuckme LOL
Yo /lbg/
I need patrician movies that are 420 friendly pls
http://letterboxd.com/yawned/
>>67276214
feherlofia and daisies are good, maybe ashes of time too.
>>67271071
http://letterboxd.com/Doublas_MK_II/
>>67276214
evil bong 1,2 and 3
>>67275859
>http://letterboxd.com/Sand/
I like your taste, I'll follow you, though I'm not very active on letterboxd anymore
>>67276285
Already got Dasies in my watchlist , added the other two as well pal
>>67276710
Followed
>>67277028
No thx
Also need recs for movies that are in mandarin , trying to learn the language so I can make ez money in china
/smoothhands
Do you have to be high to enjoy cinema?
>>67278777
No. You have to not be a pleb, though.
>>67271071
http://letterboxd.com/evolution_rex/
Come and follow /lbg/'s favorite pleb, you know you want to.
>>67276214
How is Queen of earth?
>>67279453
Really fucking good. I'm biased because I love mumblecore and angry women in general but Queen of Earth is beautiful.
It's basically mumblecore turned up to 11 , super stylised , gorgeous ost , grander feel but still allows the intimate plot to be the center of attention mainly due to excellent acting by Liz Moss.
Would rec/10
>>67279621
So you're saying you liked it?
Do you actually like the movies on your Favorites tab or are you just trying to get street cred?
>>67279690
Mayb
>>67279708
who you talkin to f a m
>>67279708
who isn't haha ;)
>mvw he hasn't at least one Soviet film on his favorites
>>67280362
Ryssäfanit vois kaikki tappaa.
There's a screening of In the Shadow of Women in a couple of days and i've never seen a garrell before, should i watch something in preparation?
>>67279708
I picked In Bruges over Stalker. So no, I'm honest.
>>67280681
absolutely. you might be underwhelmed otherwise. His recent films are very minor and subtle. Think: Hong Sang-soo
>>67280888
got any recs to start off with? i only have time to watch one though
>>67281187
Jealousy or Regular Lovers (only shitty rips available though) I guess, since they're his most recent b&w relationship dramas.
They're not his best though. L'enfant secret and Le révélateur are peak Garrell, but they don't resemble the tone of Jealousy, Regular Lovers or In the Shadow of Women.
it's upto you.
>>67281360
his filmography seems unusual, i'll probably go with jealousy since it's shorter. what about a burning hot summer?
bumpety bamp
hello i am new
pls no bully
>I really don't like this story, because even though it shows the power of Egyptian myth to some degree, even though it gives the motivation (in part) as the desecration of the sacred Egytpian tombs, it still ultimately sides with the British exploitation of an African nation. It looked nice enough, and the performances weren't bad. But the storytelling (relying on coincidence in a manner that never even gets handwaved) is lackluster and the unfortunate themes are toxic.
>>67283234
yikes tier
http://letterboxd.com/arthritis/film/deadpool/
80% review of the experience
20% review of the actual film
This means the Road is automatically a 5/5 because I got head in the back of the theatre.
>>67273220
fuck you
http://letterboxd.com/voexodus/
>>67271071
Tonight I'll be watching probably nothing, maybe Abbott and Costello meet the invisible man if I get a chance
>>67283519
Well, i'm not that new that you can fool me with that shit tier meme.
>>67284414
No you're literally yikes tier.
You have god awful taste and should find a new hobby asap
![Knight-of-Cups[3].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/lWOBAvp.jpg "Knight-of-Cups[3].jpg")
>ywn move past the aesthetic realm of existence and its ephemeral pleasures
>ywn be a knight of faith
feels bad
>>67280362
stop trying to make us happen, ammy
>>67284329
Rate. What. You. Watch.
>>67284757
lol kierke was a pathetic tard and that film and malick in general is some of the stupidest arthouse trash you could choose to fawn over
>>67284757
>ywn be this pretentious and artsy
feels good man
>>67284940
>>67284952
Bad look
>>67284940
>lol kierke was a pathetic tard
you sure btfo'd him my friend
>>67271691
It was good, fart sniffer.
>>67284905
why don't you rate what you watch for q change buddy
Reminded that until you've seen films like this and understand them you are not a real fan of cinema
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0kx81VReLo
>>67285163
id rather rate what you watch since you refuse to extrapolate likes dislikes and favorites into numerical quantifications either to be purposely vague or because you dont understand ratings can be based entirely on subjective feelings like liking or disliking a movie and dont want to sully your watching experience even though a binary like/dislike judgement is already rating a movie before you even start
literally 10 second in paint and ive already improved your profile 100fold for someone who might want to follow you
>>67276214
Le ravageur.
>>67285252
>unironically watching experimental vimeo short films
>>67278282
>less than 2000 films watched
>less than 5 films from the 20s watched (shorts don't count)
>less than 5 films from the 30s watched (shorts don't count)
>less than 10 films from the 40s watched (shorts don't count)
>3 pages for pre 1970 films logged
>11 pages for post 1970 films logged
I'm not going to follow you, you're an embryo.
>>67285318
holy shit are you ok my friend
>>67285318
> hello autism my old friend
>>67284757
Anon please, dont pretend his films are deep. Like one legend critic once said of Malick:"better not bring your thinking cap with you."
>>67285435
>>67285524
He's right though.
>>67285572
sure bud
20 years from now when his later movies are already canonized and people with functional brains have already munched them extensively for your appreciation, you'll look back and realize how much of a pleb you were back in the day
>the year 2016
>still no /lbg/ stream
Sad
>>67285853
#rekt
>>67285729
No he isn't my ratings would actually be 4*, 3*, 4.5*, 5*
https://letterboxd.com/THuG_LIF3_69/
not sure yet
http://letterboxd.com/glazomaniac/list/attention/
>It gets under my skin when they call me an attention whore. I talked to Hollie on Twitter about this, but it riles up my insecurities, my fears, my self-doubt, it's one of those buttons that you can press and send me into a haze for days. And I so much want to say, "I'm not an attention whore," but that's not the right answer. The right answer is this:
>Yes, I like attention. So what?
>>67286382
ofc the tranny likes attentio
>>67285376
>(shorts don't count)
why
>>67286688
19th century early shorts do count, but not vimeo bs.
>>67285376
cringe
>>67286382
you go, "girl"
>>67286042
not according to your profile
>>67286382
Do you people realize that just by using the right words you could literally trigger this venomous tranny to death? What a time to be alive, lads
>>67286382
>The author has requested that you don’t post comments here.
I have literally never directly or indirectly said anything negative about SJB on letterboxd.
>>67286888
Well that's because I don't use stars to rate of course!
>>67287017
cringe
>>67286918
im.blocked from posting.to her shit tho
>>67286382
great list to be honest
>>67280567
E-bin
>>67286764
why?
>>67286382
dubs decide what i post in that comment section
>>67287271
ascii hitler
>>67287260
No one cares.
leave her alone, bully
>>67287271
this >>67286827 but do it on an obscure list so it's not deleted on sight by cuckmods
>>67287271
That was really brave of you to share.
>>67287271
How do you "feel like a woman" without degrading "femininity" to caricature? And what makes you think you're entitled to any respect?
>>67285376
B^)
>>67287997
explain
>>67287271
letterboxd sucks come to cinemos
>>67287997
Is that Paradzhanov with the bird on his head? He doesn't belong there at all.
>>67285136
you're the biggest faggot on this board
>>67288195
Literally makes zero sense.
>>67288195
needs satantango
>>67288198
Oh no, someone on the internet called me a faggot.
>>67287725
>>67287465
>>67286827
All of these
>>67288227
>watching criterion rips you torrented off of KickAssTorrents in VLC
>learning to think "critically" about film from everyframeapainting and nerdwriter1
>keeping track of what TSPDT top 1000 films you've watched on imdb
>calling non Tarkovsky fanboys "enemies of cinema"
>using awards as a measure of worth
>watching entry level experimental short films on youtube while playing LoL
What about this doesn't make sense?
>>67288696
>calling non Tarkovsky fanboys "enemies of cinema"
Hello Inarritu fanboy.
>>67288817
>>67288817
It was only shit in Inarritu's flick because it was shit in the first place.
>>67288319
>Breitbart + Dawkins?
>Trump + science channels?
well some of those obviously don't belong together.
>>67288979
Bunch of good films and varied even. Good look senpai
>>67288227
>I'm retarded and can't even dress myself in the morning
Good to know, we'll keep our distance.
>>67289192
now, that is good bait
>The retarded Iñárritu vs. Tarkovski autists show up and start shitting all over
Oh, well, at least the thread gets some life
>>67289192
yikes
The "I'm patrician and also cool as heck" starter pack
>>67290197
based machill
http://letterboxd.com/bel/
ayo isda bel indahouse
>>67290197
>bio
so quirky
>>67290684
You see, it's from a popular online meme
and I love memes
>>67290359
Oh shit watch out guys, smoothhands 2.0 is here.
>>67290877
how new
What does /lbg/ think of Rocky?
>>67290903
how are you
>>67289192
>my curve is held up as the pinnacle of what a normal distribution should be
nice
>>67290939
toxic hypermasculinity
>>67291051
No that's Cobra except it's not toxic.
>>67289192
Nice
>>67290877
Literally who
How can we possibly compete?
>>67291496
She dumped flaccid for bel a long time ago
>>67291619
so the rumors are true!
>JUST
https://letterboxd.com/moviemaestro/
Haven't seen that many movies lately thanks to prelimanry assignments to film school
http://letterboxd.com/lozjudai/
>>67291921
>not using the app
yikes
>>67291728
oh shit I've said too much
now she'll spank me again ;_;
>>67291740
>this pleb has more followers than any /lbg/ reg
how do you cucks feel?
>>67291947
The app is pointless and looks horrible atm.
>>67291958
It makes sense
Majority of lb is plebeian
Plebs follow other plebs
>>67291958
>cuck
look mom i posted it again
>>67291999
hi acid u triggered?
>>67292068
acid here
yes
Armond White looks a lot like Ventura on the poster of Horse Money
>>67292177
bad post. I hate it
>>67291999
I hate you
I want Miranna to impregnate me
chad here-- how do I cuck amaranth?
>>67286382
FAT TRANNY
A
T
T
R
A
>>67271071
>>67271071
I'm interested in watching The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, the original. There are a couple on Youtube but they're of different lengths and they begin with way different looking title sequences. Which one do I watch?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecowq77Y3C0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrg73BUxJLI
>>67292937
>Youtube
AAAARRRGGGGHHH
cuccieray where
>>67292962
It's a movie from 1920 m8, it's going to pop up on HBO and I'm not going out of my way to find it on DVD or some shit. If it makes you feel any better, I'll watch it on youtube through my TV, which is of good quality.
>>67292964
Where's succieray
>>67293099
*it's not going to
>>67292964
>>67293113
d e a d
>>67293175
shid :-DDD
>>67293242
no sanos muuta
>>67293442
>>67287997
definitive
>>67276710
Followed
>>67291921
Followed
Hit me with the follow, I'm team follow back
http://letterboxd.com/MrEnormous/
>>67294251
followed
>>67294251
followed
>>67291921
follow me back I like you, I'm >>67294552
>>67293099
YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO WATCH A 1080p RIP YOU MOTHERFUCKER
>>67294315
>>67294552
Followed you guys back.
I'm thinking of watching my first Antonioni film tonight. Is L'Avventura generally a good starting point, followed by La Notte and L'Eclisse? Or does he have an earlier film I should start with?
>>67294989
Not necessarily. Sometimes you gotta work with less- for many reasons. Sure, if you are in the right country, with the right 'stuff', things are easier, but this isn't the case for most.
>>67295061
That's a good start if you don't mind slow cinema. The ones before that trilogy are pretty bad.
>>67295085
720p OR 1080p!!!!! IF AVAILABLE!!!!! IF NOT THE BEST LOWER QUALITY YOU CAN FIND!!!!
>>67295123
STOP SCREAMING YOU FUCKING AUTIST
>>67295178
STOP WATCHING FILMS IN 144p YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!!!!
>>67295106
No problems with slow cinema. Are the previous ones bad because they're slower or just not particularly interesting or well realized?
>>67295228
BUT I'M NOT DOING IT, AND EVEN IF I DID WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU CARE RETARD?
>>67295243
Just plain bad. His 5 film run in the 60s was all top notch though.
>>67295106
>slow cinema
HAHA
>The ones before that trilogy are pretty bad
>And >>67295348 with "Just plain bad"
Fokking pleb. Stop saying good things about based MA if in the next phrase you're gonna spout stupid shit.
>>67295277
BECAUSE UNLIKE YOU I FUCKING CARE ABOUT CINEMA
>>67295525
>Antonioni, Shyamalan, Nolantino, Cameron, Whedon and the list goes on!
>>67295628
NO YOU DON'T BITCH YOU'RE JUST SPERGING ABOUT RESOLUTION AS A WAY OF E-PENIS
:3
>>67295525
cringe
>>67296411
sure, friendo
