so basically they took a pretty bad ass action movie and threw the main lead to a girl who was whining because MUH JURISDICTION MUH LEGAL PROCEDURES. And in the end she just got used. The only redeeming quality of this film is that the goodbad guys got away with it.
Other than that, fuck that cunts character for just being an obstacle in the way of Alejandro's revenge.
I can almost smell your greasy fingers typing that barely coherent post, you inmense subnormal.
can someone explain to me why so many people get 2deep4u'd and miss the point of her character? like, really? how fucking obvious do you have to be about something?
if anything i thought it could have been done with a little more nuance and a slightly more realistic, less extreme characterization, but apparently not because i must have underestimated the difficulty of the pleb filter. again.
if you don't like her because she's "whiny" or "by the book" don't answer this post. save us both the trouble.
>>67252326
Come back when you've watched a few more movies, kid. Heh.
>>67252407
that post is pretty good. lol @ 2deep4ufags in this thread
>>67252326
Didn't they flat-out tell her that she was only brought on so they could get funding and jurisdiction or some shit?
Like they just needed her to be on staff and they picked her because they knew she'd be passive and take orders? That's what I thought it was. Emily Blunt is a badass regardless so going gender war in this case is fucking stupid.
>>67252326
MOTY
>>67252753
>And in the end she just got used.
yeah I was trying not to spoil it.
As for her being an obstacle, yes she had a purpose, but she didn't go along willingly.
>>67252326
Is Josh Brolin the most ELITE modern western actor?
>>67252571
/tv/, and most of the film going public, are stupid and can't into characterization. They engage their entertainment entirely passively and their reactions are kneejerk and surface level at best. Even basic character motivations are too much for them.
>>67252869
i know, but come on, this one was easy. fucking tutorial-tier. jesus christ.
i guess this is why almost everything has to be so heavy-handed and expository these days. fuck my life.
>>67252753
at least this guy is here, that's comforting
>>67252571
im not OP, nor did i dislike her behaviour, but what according to you is the point of her character?
just curious if we have the same interpretation
>>67252980
>>67252869
>>67252571
You guys are essentially dumb fucks. In no place in the OP is it posted that her character was pointless, merely that her character was UNLIKED & for valid reasons.
>but if you don't like the character for the specific reasons she's shit for, then that doesn't count because she's important to the movie.
Which is exactly why the movie was shit.
You faggots are stupider than the people you're bitching about.
>>67253195
Did you think you were supposed to like her character just because her character is a female?
That's sexist.
She's a bull headed try hard from the beginning to the end, and the story isn't about her; it's simply shown to us (almost entirely) from her perspective. Just because she gets most of the "over the shoulder cam", if anything she's exactly what the OP described "an obstacle". If you think that isn't intentional, or it bothers you, you're a fucking retard.
>>67253399
yes they intentionally made her a shit character, that's why the movie's shit, because it contains a shit character. Regardless of how much I loved Alejandro's story line.
>>67253456
Please don't breed.
>>67252326
nigga you a simple bitch
>>67253517
If I were to not do so, then unlike you, it would be by choice.
>>67253645
i can only imagine how well that went over in your head before you started typing
>>67252326
I agree it would have been much better if we just had Alejandro as the main character.
>>67253645
Good one, gentlesir!
>>67253456
U stupid
>>67253645
So you chose not to get laid?
>I'm getting a boner
what did he mean by this?
this is a shitty tacticool flick, not the catcher in the rye you 2deep4u autists
