ITT: Post movie-related things that annoy you
>When millennials think it's funny to pretend certain bad movies don't exist (Indiana Jones 4, The Last Airbender, etc...)
>When people in forums quote popular movie scenes at each other one line at a time
>When wannabe patricians pretend to like art house, because they feel like they're supposed to
this thread
This thread.
I FEEL THE NEED
>>67179836
>millennials
1980-1999
When redditors come to /tv/ and out themselves by capitalizing greentext.
>>67179862
THE NEED FOR SPEED
When people start quoting/imitating Rick and Morty in a thread not about Rick and Morty. Not even similar things like comedies or scifi or whatever. It's like, whenever I go into a thread in r/politics someone's postin about Bernie Sanders talking like Rick, it ricks me off.
>>67179836
definitely this thread and board in general
>>67179836
>When millennials think it's funny to pretend certain bad movies don't exist (Indiana Jones 4, The Last Airbender, etc...)
I've only ever seen non-millennials do this honestly, and that's because it's the movies that non-millennials grew up with that are getting remade/rebooted/given a sequel to, which causes butthurt.
>>67179884
newfag
>>67179929
Who is this spunk monk?
>>67179909
>>67179969
dutch girl called elizabeth freya, facebook ella freya
>>67179969
Elizabeth Freya
lrn2gis
>>67180003
Good RE4 Ashley cosplay.
>>67180050
this is the difference between you and me, you immediately think about her looking like a videogame character, and i think about licking her asshole then shoving my cock into it
>>67180003
She looks computer generated.
The only thing giving away that she's a real person are the hands.
>>67180123
Don't talk about my waifu that way.
>>67180152
are you that obsessed with videogames?pic related, it's you
>>67180173
i would also probably strangle her whilst doing that
>Lifting up a gun at someone
>cha-click
I want to punch the tv screen every time.
>>67179958
I've been here since 2008. Still a newfag, but definitely much longer than you.
Waifufags derailing threads
>>67180313
>I've been here since 2008
still somehow dont know shit. keep lurking, stop posting, newfag
>>67180187
I'm not even the same person as the guy that mentioned RE4.
But you have to admit if two separate people indepently think she looks like she's made of cgi then there must be some basis too it.
>>67180289
or you learn more about guns
>>67179836
that picture depresses me terribly OP
>>67180380
i knew you weren't i'm just so use to seeing /v/tards on this board
>>67179836
IF I QUOTED AN ALTERED LINE, WOULD YOU CRY?
>>67180363
You don't capitalize greentext.
>>67180003
>dem dwarf hands
>>67180782
who are you quoting
When the guy in the movie has a girlfriend and doesn't want to strangle her because she's annoying as fuck
>>67180999
Trips confirm girls annoying as fuck
>>67180289
This is why I can't stand the Hardcore Horseshit trailers. They just touch a gun and it clicks like fifteen times. Its some 2010 youtube tier balogna.
>>67179836
you're a millennial too, idiot
>>67180389
>or you learn more about guns
So what makes the noise then?
They're all using glocks with no safeties, nobody is racking a slide or pulling a hammer back. No 1911s so no grip safety, etc.
I've been shooting guns my whole life, and carrying a pistol daily for 8 years. It doesn't make a noise when I pull it out.
>when plebs think people can only pretend to like art house films
>>67179879
>>67181191
so????
>>67180712
when it is a quote, yes you can
>>67179836
>When people in forums quote popular movie scenes at each other one line at a time
YOU'RE LE BIG GUY!
Can you guys stop acting like fags and get
back to what's important: qt discussion.
>>67181426
DURN
>>67181280
This. Mostly because this idea of pretending to like films for "status" is so stupid. What status? Who gives a fuck about that kind of thing anyway?
>>67179879
>1980-1999
lmao at this grandpa thinking he's part of a relevant generation
I'm going to marry Freya.
>>67181558
yet most people do exactly that
>>67179929
People who post irrelevant pictures of cookie-cutter 'qts' to attract attention to shitty opinions
>>67179836
When people give criticism about a film from a marketing perspective. It's fucking retarded.
>character development
>attachment
>immersion
>impact
It's criticism for the brain-dead. The plug-and-chug criticism development.
>>67182399
but those arent from a marketing perspective
>>67182516
Those literally are from a marketing perspective. They revolve around impact of a film on the audience, and are typically spouted as 'objective' despite the fact that they're arbitrary criteria for merit, but objective criteria for having an audience develop autistic tendencies towards the work.
>>67182569
I would agree with you with "attachment" and "impact", but the other two are pretty much screenplay/script writing 101.
