>rejected not because of small kingdom
>rejected because he is manlet and "small kingdom"
>>67168901
>thinking vikings are all 8 foot giants
>in actuality medieval malnourished snow Somalians
Get out, Nazi revisionists.
>>67168941
This. And knights were also like 5'5 at best. But strong as fuck, all dem metal on them
>>67168941
>>67168964
I bet you think nobody lived beyond 30 in the middle ages as well?
>>67168964
Romans wrote that Germanic tribes were considerably taller than them and always made fun of le Roman manlets
wasn't Charlemagne like 6 feet tall?
>>67168988
6' would be those times' equivalent of 6'4.
did vikings actually have that many tattoos like they do in the show? And are women not allowed to have tattoos?
i don't ever remember vikings being discussed this much on /tv/ what happened
>>67168988
Viking KINGS were barely 1.74mt pleb.
Ragnar oiling that pole was really hot.
>>67171946
Why did Floki turn into such a whiny bitch?
>>67171960
Influential cis character that was targeted by producers for the cuck conditioning agenda
>>67168901
Another fucking flick ruined by manlets, immersion ruined. I fucking hate manlets.
>>67171946
Can't believe I went from liking a character to outright hating him so quickly
LONG LIVE EARL INGSTAD
>>67168988
ye see? germanic tribes.
totally not the same thing as vikings.
>>67172384
fuk earl ingstad.
torvi is the new prime vikingfu
>>67168901
vikings were like 5 foot 5
>>67172426
Who is this
>>67172384
WOMYN POWARR LMAOOO
>>67168985
It's true though. The vikings were malnourished and small.
>>67168941
>medieval malnourished snow Somalians
How can you even compare? *RETARD ALERT*
