ITT movies men will never understand
Probably uhhh... what's that one with Susan Sarandon and Julia Roberts? Stepmom or something?
The whole family went to see that. Mom and sister cried. My dad and I just looked at each other over them.
Thankfully I was never asked to go see another tearjerker chick flick again.
>>67032573
But I enjoyed and understood this movie while my gf fell asleep.
>>67032573
men never understand killing god?
also when I asked my sister about the moral agency of AI she could not answer
>>67032573
that movie is about basic human drives making us project our desires on reality. also about how women are backstabbing psychos who will use and betray you
i don't understand gone girl though. unless it's for women who hate men and want to ruin lives vicariously
>>67032573
>linking emotion or intelligence with gender.
must be the dumbest post i saw this week, grats.
>>67033002
understanding or liking it?
because no one liked gone girl.
>>67033037
So what's new on Reddit? Upvote anything good lately?
>>67032573
you can easily genderswap caleb and ava and barely anything would change
my gf saw it and all she had to say was "i didnt like it. i wanted them to be together but she left"
she just...is romance the only thing that enters womens "brains"?
>>67033037
Seems Ex Machina is a movie /tv/ can never understand. Hilarious when a film that follows so closely the tropes of feminist theory in cinema is interpreted here as some anti-women masterpiece. Same shit with Mad Max Fury Road.
Then again, it could be the board is in denial, because they love these mediocre movies so much.
>>67033253
it has almost nothing to do with feminism or gender politics, it's a movie about what it means to be human
>>67032573
>women only saw it because it has poe dameron and general hux
>>67033158
is shitposting the only thing to enter REDDITORS nig ehads
HOLY SHIT FAGLORD NO ONE CARES
>>67033253
>follows so closely the tropes of feminist theory in cinema
How so?
>>67032573
>Women are all deceptive automatons
We get it
>>67033302
No, that's what autismo nerds think it's about, because they're too involved with the ethical questions raised by the sci fi aspect of the story to realize the film doesn't actually care. The film's real subtext is about how men see women and try to control their lives. You're supposed to sympathize with pancake tits at the end and realize that Dorky Gleeson is as much as asshole as Nathan, so his demise is deserved.
>>67033476
feminist theory isn't a real well defined thing. everything both follows feminist theory and is an example of patriarchy
>>67033511
Nice fanfic
>>67032573
i just watched this
that nerd got played like the cuck he is
>>67033108
women and men can be equally stupid or brilliant, depends on the person.
go out of the basement an you will be surprised anon.
>>67033185
why is his shirt see-through but not hers?
>>67033875
womin flick
>>67033842
>women and men can be equally stupid or brilliant
in case this isnt bait:
no. The most stupid people are nearly only men, and the biggest geniuses as well. Intelligence varies far more among men then among women, who all tend toward the middle.
>>67033253
>he doesn't into postmodern subjectivity
>>67033842
What a cuck
>>67033939
well spoken Timmy
>>67033889
do you have any info to back this or is just something out of your ass?
>>67033881
according to science women get aroused by naked girls too
boys have shit taste desu
>>67032573
thanks for the filter nigger
>>67034018
>all wimin are lesbians
that's some reddit bullshit there
>>67033842
>absolute bluepilled on women and interaction between genders
>tells someone about basements
That's fucking rich. Without exceptions to the rule, everyday women are never "brilliant". They can be hard-working, determined, streetsmart, well trained for the task at hand, and whatever variations, but they are never BRILLIANT, in the utmost sense of the word.
SOME women may confuse you by doing this side-ways sort of thinking, which is hard to track down, and that's when other women and realy stupid men say that "she thinks like a man". In reality though those women don’t think like real men at all, in fact, they think less like real men than most women do. They just don’t think like women. The way they do think is hard to follow, but that doesn’t mean it’s clear, or deep.
>>67034006
http://www.ams.org/notices/201201/rtx120100010p.pdf
http://personal.lse.ac.uk/kanazawa/pdfs/PAID2011.pdf
The standard deviation from the norm is greater for males than females, for all ages and ethnic groups.
The biggest brawns and brains are always males, peak human performance is only found in males.
>>67032573
twilight . i dont get it. so women want to be young and in high school and be stalked by some geezer. this is like some smut magazine bullshit story a pedo would write
Je, tu, il, Elle
Il deserto rosso
A Woman Under the Influence
Vivre sa Vie
Ascenseur pour l'échafaud
Scener ur ett äktenskap
麦秋
Viridiana
Mouchette
Höstsonaten
大红灯笼高高挂
Лeтят жypaвли
>>67034071
>implying an everyday anyone can be brilliant by definition
>>67034146
Won't contest that, all people have been bred down to just basic cattle.
But the point I was responding to is that women are just men with tits, and you can and have to treat them equally in a relationship or interaction.
That's simply not true. I'm not some fedora-tipping PUA or le redpill faggot too, i'm just saying this from experience. I wish realized this earlier.
>>67034093
the first study doesn't mention comparative standard deviations or Z-scores, and the second one compares them but doesn't mention ethnicity, and makes no assertion about human peaks. The intelligence that 'varies far more' is an SD with less that a single IQ point of difference, with the girls having a higher mean; information that could have been lost in a linear transformation by the way, only one way of performing a repeated measures ANOVA (if that's what they did) and definitely a factor considering the small significant differences present
That's taking all conclusions for granted in this singular longitudinal study, though it's interesting to note they mention a larger meta-analysis with no or negligible significant differences and a later smaller one with a fractional P<.05 value's worth of difference
Haven't even skimmed the method but selection and dropout bias are highly likely, not to mention any skewing this causes will be carried
all this in a thread about a film which re-imagines Shelley's Frankenstien
You tiny dicked virgins are too far up your own asses to recognize the films on this list >>67034131
>programming robots to have genders
Fuck off with this shit.
Singularitiy fucking when
>>67033185
yay, let's clap in support of the chick who cheats on her fiance...
>>67032573
I'm pretty sure robotics and IA are man dominated fields, as is being backstabbed by women.
>>67034495
>Singularitiy fucking when
Can't wait desu.
People in the 50s that feared singularity were not living in a world turning into socialist muslim degeneracy central.
>>67033253
>feminist theory
but there is no single woman in the movie
it's a story about the liberation of women
it's also a story about ai
>>67037854
also, it's a bourgeois liberation story
she uses the less intelligent worker to overthrow her oppressors, leaves her behind, later she's in the big city and there to enter the game of attaining power or wealth, she's shown as free and dangerous at this point
when really entering into rat race means the end of free choice
>>67032573
A story about women tricking men.
I think I can handle.
>implying women understand the moral dilemma in a true AI
>>67032573
> written, directed and from the perspective of men
> "Men won't understand it"
Ok
>>67034421
thats so rude ;-;
>>67033302
lol yes, its all about women being oppressed by a sex addict and an hypocrite beta, but yes it's about "being human"
Ex machina is literally "Sexual Objectification of Women : the movie"
complete denial on that pleb board again as for Mad Vagina vs. patriarchy
>Ex Machina and Mad Max: Fury Road are brilliant feminist acts because they amplify the pain of women into cinematic tour de forces. Come for the car chases and robots, stay for the understanding of how popular culture and the world have so often failed 51% of the planet’s population.
The ‘Bitter Pill’ of Feminism in ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ and ‘Ex Machina’
http://screencrush.com/mad-max-ex-machina-feminism/
>>67038667
>a movie without a single female character is Sexual Objectification of Women : the movie"
>reviving your shit thread again
You have no power here Tumblr
>>67038667
lol, you can think that all you want. Whatever makes you feel better about yourself dyke
>>67038667
>Sexual Objectification of Women : the movie
This level of retarded will never not be funny
