This was pretty good. Why did it bomb?
Becuz Assbender didn't look like Jobs
>>67015794
Because it was not good.
>>67015794
shit dialogue and people wanted to see the actual releases
>Seth Rogen
nothing of value was lost
It was fucking shit
because there's already shitload of movies and books about him.
The Ashton one was better
I thought it had some intense scenes and Fassbender was great as Jobs even though he didn't particularly look like him. It bombed because it's not the sort of movie people go to the cinema to see, especially not after already having a Steve Jobs movie. I would rate it 7/10
>>67015794
Man there were like 4 different movies about this guy. So cringe-tastic. Poor guy. Die of horrible fucking cancer and then Ashton Kutcher and Benderbick Cumberpatch play you while your goddamn corpse is still warm.
You're twelve. Gladly die.
REMOVE YOURSELF FROM THE PREMISES
>>67016001
Bale would've been a better fit.
>>67016397
>Benderbick Cumberpatch
Who?
I thought the structure of it was weird just having the three life events.
Would of preferred something more like social network
>>67016342
Pffffff
Didn't have the meme magic of Ashton's portrayal.
>>67016102
Go watch the ashton kutcher jobs.
>>67015794
Plebs. Like the ones complaining itt.
people don't like sorkin dialogue, jobs project overexposure after his death, and the movie arrived dead last. poor word of mouth after wide release ultimately killed it despite the solid reviews in the limited release.it's a decent movie and clearly the best jobs related movie
>>67015794
It's probably one of the most underrated movies of 2015. Great acting, great writing, great directing.
People were put off the idea of watching a Steve Jobs movie after that turd Kutcher put out.
>"I aLREeADY FIreD YOu"
It just couldn't compete with Jobs on a meme level. Not to mention they just threw in Seth Rogen as a big fuck you to the audience for not accepting him. Should've been Jonah Hill tbqh.
