Did Caesar do anything wrong?
>>67010601
going too fast on his quest for Monarchy
Including barbarians in the Senat like 5 years after defeating the Gauls was also too fast for the Romans
When your entire society is based on rebelling against a tyrant king, you should be careful of looking like a tyrant king.
>>67010645
>implying Caesar was on a quest for monarchy
>>67010658
>implying anything Caesar did resembled tyranny or kingship
so many Patricians ITT. you fucks are ruining rome
>>67010645
True that, I feel like he did truly want to unite Rome (regardless of class) and do great things for his people.
>>67010812
He WAS on a quest for personal power. Like the gracchi, he just saw the plebs as the means of accomplishing it.
The Senate wasn't really trying to restore liberty, they just didn't want to lose their prestige and framing it as a Brutus killing a monarch like during the foundation of the Republic is how they justified it to themselves
>>67010878
>Caesar was on a quest for personal power
[Citation Needed]
>>67010601
No. He was trying to save the Republic from itself.
>>67011032
rare
>>67010895
Yes I'm sure an aristocrat who tore up Gaul just to pay for his own personal debts and gave more and more power to himself as dictator was solely motivated by love of the people
The liberators weren't any better though
>>67011297
He went to Gaul because the Gauls were constantly raiding over the border and the Roman people needed living room.
NO PROSTITUTES, ACTORS, OR UNCLEAN TRADESMEN MAY ATTEND.
>>67010601
Spared his enemies.
>>67010601
These are Italians you're talking about here. It was strictly business. Nothing personal.
>>67010601
Notoriously accepting of other cultures and religions including the Jews.
Literally fought in battles with his men sometimes.
Did nothing wrong
>>67010601
Forgiving the Senators who supported Pompeii
